Moral of the Lesson:
Keep eye on the feet and the ball.... and not on the guy in 10 No. jersey or his hair style !!
Under the Delhi Liquor policy as prepared by the Kejriwal regime; in a departure from norms in most states, the city government no longer had anything to do with selling liquor and allowed only private shops to do so.
The central aim was claimed to be to stop black marketing, increase revenue and improve the consumer experience.
It also allowed the home delivery of liquor and shops to stay open till 3 am.
Licensees could also offer unlimited discounts. The Delhi government then reported a substantial 27 per cent increase in income from the policy, generating around Rs 8,900 crore.
Delhi incurred losses of over Rs 2,000 crore due to flaws in the 2021-22 liquor policy by previous Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) government, according to a Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) report tabled in the Delhi Assembly in Feb 2025.
The report also highlighted serious policy lapses, procedural violations, and ignored expert recommendations. It pointed out that then Deputy Chief Minister and Excise Minister Manish Sisodia "disregarded key suggestions" from an expert panel while formulating the now-scrapped liquor policy.
Yet the high-profile case vis-a-vis the corruption associated with it collapsed and could not pass through the judicial scrutiny at the level of the lower court.
Thus the High Court battle sooner than later could determine the future trajectory of the case. The argument may easily go --- in general sense the ED and CBI seem to mirror each other in their failures, creating immediate political and media impact.
The CBI, by contrast, boasts conviction rates of 65–75 per cent in Prevention of Corruption Act (PCA) cases, seemingly a prosecutorial powerhouse.
Yet dig deeper and the sheen fades—most of these “wins” appear to be low-level trap cases, while in complex, high-profile scandals like the 2G spectrum allocation, coal block allocations, Commonwealth Games contracts, and the Delhi liquor policy probe, the probe agency has repeatedly failed to secure convictions.
Both agencies suffer from the same underlying credibility deficit: their most publicised cases too often collapse in court, leaving the statistics to tell a misleadingly flattering story.
The CAG report on Delhi Liquor policy had estimated a revenue loss of Rs 941.53 crore, citing failure to obtain timely permissions for opening liquor vends in non-conforming municipal wards -- areas not designated for liquor sales under zoning laws. This led to a significant financial impact on the Delhi government’s earnings.
Hence, it may be a safe conclusion - the CBI failure in this case is humungous.

No comments:
Post a Comment