Monday, March 9, 2026

Nand Kishore Yadav as Nagaland Governor; What PM Modi is telling Nagas ??? ----- Courtesy The Raisina Hills

Whether that constitutional role extends to nudging a peace process — or simply managing the status quo — remains to be seen."

Courtesy - The Raisina Hills 


 By NIRENDRA DEV


The appointment of Nand Kishore Yadav as the new Governor of Nagaland was formally announced on March 5, 2026, following approval from President Droupadi Murmu, as part of a wider administrative reshuffle across nine states and Union Territories.

The move has surprised many political observers — and satisfied few of them. A low-profile Bihar politician has been entrusted with one of the country’s most politically sensitive constitutional posts. 


While Bihar’s ruling establishment has celebrated warmly, those watching the long-stalled Naga peace process are asking a harder question: what does this appointment say about New Delhi’s strategic seriousness toward Nagaland?


Who Is Nand Kishore Yadav?

Yadav is a senior BJP leader with deep roots in the RSS, having begun his ideological journey with the organisation in 1969 and joining the Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad in 1971. 


He entered electoral politics as a councillor in the Patna Municipal Corporation in 1978, and was elected Deputy Mayor of Patna in 1982.

He represented the Patna Sahib constituency in the Bihar Legislative Assembly for more than three decades, serving across successive NDA governments with portfolios including Road Construction, Urban Development, Tourism, and Health. Most recently, he served as the 17th Speaker of the Bihar Legislative Assembly from 2024 to 2025.


However, Yadav was denied a ticket in the November 2025 Bihar assembly elections — after which his trajectory pointed, quite clearly, toward a constitutional posting rather than continued electoral politics.

A Smart Bihar Move — But What About Nagaland?


The political logic from Bihar’s perspective is easy enough to decode. With the BJP set to claim the chief ministership of Bihar for the first time after decades of ceding the top post to Nitish Kumar's JD (U), the party’s central leadership needed to gracefully transition senior Bihar figures out of direct electoral competition. 


Elevating Yadav to a gubernatorial role achieves precisely that — with dignity, and without creating internal friction.


Bihar Deputy Chief Minister Samrat Choudhary summarised the mood in the BJP camp: “Nand Kishore Yadav has been a senior leader of Bihar and worked for the BJP-Jan Sangh for a long time. For this appointment, I thank Home Minister Amit Shah and Prime Minister Modi.”

From the standpoint of Bihar’s political arithmetic, this is a shrewd move. But when the lens shifts to Nagaland, the calculus changes entirely.

The Naga Peace Process: Still Waiting for a Signal


The Naga political issue has defied resolution for decades. 


A Governor, however experienced or well-connected, cannot by themselves unlock a peace settlement — particularly when the principal armed stakeholder, the NSCN-IM, continues to insist on two foundational demands: 

-- a separate Naga constitution and a distinct Naga flag. 







These are demands the Government of India has consistently declined to accept, and no gubernatorial appointment changes that fundamental deadlock.

What the appointment of Yadav does signal — to those watching closely — is that the Centre does not appear to have a fresh or urgent strategy on the Naga issue ahead of the 2028 Nagaland assembly elections. The impression of adhocism is difficult to avoid.


The “Status Quo club” among overground political elements in Nagaland has long been seen as a force that effectively stalls any final solution pact — an arrangement that suits multiple parties, including those currently in power. The question this appointment prompts is whether New Delhi has, at least tacitly, decided to let the NPF-BJP government in Kohima continue its run through to 2028 — stable, safe, and largely performance-free — rather than push for a breakthrough that no one is quite ready to absorb.


The Bihar-Nagaland Parallel: Patience, Sacrifice — and a Lesson

There is a striking structural parallel between how the BJP has managed Bihar and how it is managing Nagaland.

In Bihar, the party held more Legislative Assembly seats than Nitish Kumar’s JD (U) after the 2020 elections — yet continued to cede the chief ministership to Kumar as a matter of coalition necessity. 


In Nagaland, the BJP has similarly allowed its partner NDPP, led by Chief Minister Neiphiu Rio, to contest 40 of the 60 assembly seats, accepting a secondary role in the coalition despite its own organisational ambitions in the state.

Rio’s political longevity also mirrors Kumar’s — both have governed their respective states for over two decades. Yadav replaces Ajay Kumar Bhalla, who had been holding the additional charge of Nagaland since the death of Governor La. Ganesan on August 15 last year. 


The prolonged vacancy itself speaks to how much bandwidth the Centre has devoted to the Nagaland question.

The BJP’s strategic patience in such alliance arrangements is notable. 

But Bihar has now shown what that patience eventually yields: when the moment comes, the party moves decisively and takes what it has earned. Regional allies of the BJP — in Nagaland, and elsewhere — would do well to understand the pattern.

The R N Ravi Factor: What His Appointment Tells Us

One piece of political intelligence that has circulated in Nagaland circles deserves a corrective. 


For months, some political figures in Kohima had fed the narrative that former Nagaland Governor R N Ravi — who was notably outspoken on extortion networks operating in the state — had fallen out of favour with the Centre, and particularly with Home Minister Amit Shah.

The latest gubernatorial reshuffle, which included the appointment of R N Ravi as the Governor of West Bengal, effectively puts that narrative to rest. 


Ravi’s elevation to one of the country’s most politically significant and high-profile Raj/Lok Bhavans is an unmistakable signal that he retains the confidence of both Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Amit Shah. 


His earlier transfer from Nagaland to Tamil Nadu — and now to West Bengal — was career progression, not punishment.


Those in Nagaland’s political class who built their calculations on Ravi’s perceived marginalisation may wish to revise their reading of New Delhi’s intentions.

The Decline of the NPF and the BJP’s Long Game

The Naga People’s Front (NPF) — once the dominant regional force in Nagaland under leaders like  Shurhozelie, and Vamuzo — is a significantly diminished political entity today. 

It has increasingly become a home for defectors and political survivors rather than an organisation with a distinct ideological identity or grassroots energy.

The formation of the Eastern Nagaland Peoples’ Organisation-backed FNTA (Frontier Nagaland Territory Accord) framework has added a new dimension to the state's internal political geography — one that reflects both the desire for greater autonomy among eastern Naga tribes and the fragmentation of the post-NDPP political landscape.



Against this backdrop, the BJP’s strategic patience in Nagaland begins to look like something more calculated. By 2028, or at the latest by 2033, the party’s groundwork — built steadily through alliance management, organisational expansion, and the caste arithmetic of its “Yadav” governor appointment, which carries its own symbolic messaging — could position the BJP as the natural political choice for a new generation of Nagaland voters, much as it has become the dominant force across the Hindi heartland.







A Note on the New Governor’s Profile

Like his predecessor La. Ganesan, Nand Kishore Yadav carries strong RSS roots — but the two men are markedly different in temperament and political background.


Ganesan was, in many respects, a product of the idealist old guard of Tamil Nadu’s RSS tradition: principled, somewhat removed from the rough-and-tumble of coalition management, and not particularly equipped for the political complexities of Nagaland.


Yadav, by contrast, is a Bihari neta forged in the competitive politics of one of India’s most politically intense states. 


He has managed coalitions, survived Bihar’s volatile caste arithmetic, and spent three decades navigating the corridors of the Patna Secretariat. If nothing else, he brings a sharpness to the Raj Bhavan that has been absent for some time.

In his first public statement following the appointment, 

Yadav said: “I will play my role in the development of Nagaland within the limits of the Constitution.”

Whether that constitutional role extends to nudging a peace process that has stalled for years — or simply managing the status quo until the next election cycle — remains to be seen.

(This is an opinion piece. Views expressed are author’s own.)

"I have never seen such irresponsible opposition party in my life time," Parliamentary Affairs Minister Rijiju blasts Opp. as they ran shy of debating Motion against Lok Sabha Speaker

Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju blasts Opposition parties in Lok Sabha as they ran shy of debating Motion against Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla.  


"I have never seen such irresponsible opposition party in my life time," he said even as opposition members were raising slogans and displaying placards demanding discussions on West Asia.

The No Trust Motion against Speaker On Birla was brought by Opposition members in Feb during the first half of the Budget session. Under the rule, this Motion has to be taken up on priority basis. 






Kiren Rijiju said the opposition members were "confused" and they did not know which issue to be flagged how and when.

Bringing in another adjournment motion when the No Confidence Motion against Speaker has not been taken up; it was an act of irresponsibility and showed absence of "decorum" and showed no adherence to the rules of the House.


"This opposition does not understand the basic ethics of the House," he said.  







 Lok Sabha chair Jagadambika Pal on Monday flayed the opposition parties and said they were being "irresponsible" as the motion initiated by them was not allowed to be taken up. 


"You are being irresponsible", he told K C Venugopal of Congress and other members. Pal said - it is truly unbecoming of Opposition members that they were not allowing the House to function when for his part Speaker Om Birla has taken "high moral ground" and has declined to chair the proceedings of the House. 


The House was first adjourned for about three hours but the stalemate continued even after the Lok Sabha met after 3 pm. 


The House was then adjourned for the day. 

Kiren Rijiju slammed the opposition parties for 'surrendering' to the whims and fancies of LoP Rahul Gandhi and went onto remark -- "aap log kya chahten haen, ek parivar, ek aadmi ... pura desh ka Maharaja hae kya".   


Apparently there is a division among Opposition parties on the No Trust motion against Speaker. Earlier in the day, outside Parliament, Samajwadi Party MP Dimple Yadav said her party was keen for discussions on West Asia.  


The BJP issued whip to Lok Sabha members directing them to attend the proceedings of March 9 and 10.  

All eyes are also on the Substantive Motion moved against Rahul Gandhi by BJP's vocal lawmaker Nishikant Dubey  


"All members of the BJP in Lok Sabha are therefore requested to be positively present in the House on both the days and support the government's stand," the BJP directive said. 

The opposition parties led by Congress submitted a no-confidence notice seeking the removal of the Lok Sabha Speaker.


It was signed by 118 MPs.  


Last month during the session, Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla had schooled LoP Rahul Gandhi for not following proper Parliamentary procedure during a debate on the motion of thanks to the President's address in the Lok Sabha.


After Rahul Gandhi gave "permission" to another MP to speak while he was speaking, the Speaker said, "Who are you to give this permission? You can't give permission, that's my right".

"You have no right to allow anyone, only the chair has the right to allow."


Om Birla chided Mr Gandhi after the Congress leader, while delivering his remarks, paused and indicated to BJP MP Kamlesh Paswan who was on his feet and wanted to say something. "I am a democratic person and I will allow the other person to speak," Mr Gandhi had said earning a sharp rebuke from the Speaker. 


If the opposition parties do not move the No Confidence Motion against Lok Sabha Speaker, it would be anoher self-goal by the Congress and its associates and allies.  


ends 



Two Bangladeshi accused of killing Osman Hadi arrested in West Bengal


The West Bengal Police Special Task Force have arrested the prime accused, Faisal, and an alleged associate from the border area of Bongaon in the Indian state of West Bengal.


Dhaka Inspector General of Police (IGP) Md Ali Hossain Fakir today said diplomatic efforts are under way to bring back two suspects arrested in India in connection with the killing of former Inqilab Moncho spokesperson Sharif Osman Hadi.



Speaking at a press conference at the Police Headquarters Media Centre in Dhaka, the newly appointed police chief said the Bangladesg Ministry of Foreign Affairs was working to repatriate the two accused,Faisal Karim Masud and Alamgir Hossain,to Bangladesh soon.


Replying to a question about the arrest of the suspects in India and the steps taken to return them, the IGP said diplomatic channels were being used to repatriate the suspects. They would be brought back shortly, he added.


Faisal, 37, is a resident of Patuakhali, and Alamgir, 34, is from Dhaka, according to sources. 


Responding to another question on political patrons of teen gangs in Bangladesh, Fakir said it is not the responsibility of police to control political parties, but anyone involved in criminal activity will face legal action.


“Political parties are the main driving force in the country’s politics. They decide in parliament where the country will go, how the police will function, and how society will operate,” he said.



“Can you take action against your father?” he asked, explaining that controlling political parties is not the duty of the police.


“If they engage in criminal activities or break the law, we will bring them under the law,” he added.


The IGP said law enforcement agencies have already prepared a list of terrorists and listed criminals and will soon launch operations against them.


Speaking about mob violence, he said police have plans to tackle such incidents and have already taken action in several cases.


According to him, many people involved in mob attacks are linked to drugs, looting and other crimes.


He said some groups exploit chaotic situations to carry out assaults and theft, while others help spread violence more widely. Police are preparing a list of those responsible for such acts.


At the same time, he warned citizens not to take the law into their own hands. Fakir said police will uphold the rule of law and ensure justice, adding that banned organisations or other groups will not be allowed to create disorder on the streets under any pretext.


Ahead of Eid-ul-Fitr, the police chief said steps have already been taken to ensure safe travel for home-bound people on roads, highways, waterways and railways.


Ends 

#Opposition confused ... #LokSabha could not take up No Confidence Motion against Speaker Om Birla. House adjourned till 3 pm

 Lok Sabha chair Jagadambika Pal on Monday flayed the opposition parties and said they were being "irresponsible" as the motion initiated by them was not allowed to be taken up. 


#Opposition confused ... #LokSabha could not take up No Confidence Motion against Speaker Om Birla. House adjourned till 3 pm 








"You are being irresponsible", he told K C Venugopal of Congress and other members. Pal said - it is truly unbecoming of Opposition members that they were not allowing the House to function when for his part Speaker Om Birla has taken "high moral ground" and has declined to chair the proceedings of the House. 

Sunday, March 8, 2026

"Indian Embassy in Tehran remains fully operational and on high alert," says Jaishankar in Rajya Sabha

On the conflict situation in West Asia, EAM Dr S Jaishankar says," The Indian Embassy has facilitated the relocation of several Indian students in Tehran to places outside. Indian nationals in Iran on business were facilitated to cross over to Armenia to return to India. 


Our Embassy in Tehran remains fully operational and on high alert. We are committed to supporting the Indian community at this time...".







Opposition members kept on raising slogan while the Minister was making his statement. 


Condemning the ruckus by the Oppostion MPs during EAM's statement in Rajya Sabha on West Asia, Union Health Minister J P Nadda says," With great sadness, I am saying that the Opposition's behaviour is very irresponsible and also condemnable. They have no interest in the country or debate but only in raising anarchy."  


"In view of the implications of this conflict for our energy security, the government remains committed to ensuring that it takes into account the availability, cost and risks of the energy markets. For us, the interest of the Indian consumer is and will always be the overriding priority," the External Affairs Minister said.


 Statement : 

Dr Jaishankar : 

I rise to apprise this august House of recent developments in West Asia that are a cause of deep concern to all of us. As Hon’ble Members are aware, this round of conflict started on 28 February 2026. It has witnessed not only fighting between Israel and the United States on one side and Iran on the other, but also attacks on a number of Gulf States. 


There have been numerous casualties, including at the leadership level in Iran, as well as destruction of infrastructure in the region.


2. At the very outset, Government had issued a statement on 28 February expressing its deep concern and urging all sides to exercise restraint, avoid escalation and prioritize the safety of civilians. We believed and continue to believe that dialogue and diplomacy should be pursued to de-escalate tensions and address underlying issues. Sir, it is also imperative that the sovereignty and territorial integrity of all states in the region be respected.


3. Given the gravity of the situation, the Cabinet Committee of Security (CCS) met on 01 March under the Chairmanship of the Hon'ble Prime Minister. 


It was briefed on the airstrikes in Iran and the subsequent attacks in several Gulf countries. The CCS was concerned over the safety and security of the Indian community in the region. It also focused on the implications for regional security and for economic and commercial activities. 


The Committee was apprised of difficulties faced by Indian travelers transiting the region and by students appearing for scheduled examinations in these countries. It directed all concerned Ministries and Departments to take appropriate measures to respond to these problems. Hon’ble Prime Minister continues to closely monitor emerging developments and the relevant Ministries are coordinating to ensure effective responses.


4. The conflict has continued to intensify and the security situation in the region has deteriorated significantly. We have noted that, in fact, the conflict spread to other nations with mounting destruction and deaths. Normal life and economic activities in the entire region are visibly affected and, in some cases, had come to a halt. We, therefore, reiterated our call on 03 March for dialogue and diplomacy and spoke up for an early end to the conflict. I am confident that the House joins me in expressing our sorrow at the loss of lives.


5. Hon’ble Chairman Sir, while any development that negatively impacts peace and security in the world is deeply troubling, this ongoing conflict is an issue of particular concern for India. 


We are a neighbouring region and understandably, have obvious stakes that West Asia remain stable and peaceful. There are almost one crore Indian citizens who live and work in the Gulf nations. 


In Iran too, there are a few thousand Indians who are there for study or for employment. The region is key to our energy security and includes many important suppliers of oil and gas.


6. Chairman Sir, the Gulf is also a major trade partner, accounting for almost USD 200 billion annually. The House is also aware that in the last decade, there have been significant investments from the region into the Indian economy. Therefore, serious supply chain disruptions and climate of instability that we perceive are serious issues. Furthermore, these

 include attacks on merchant shipping where Indian nationals often constitute a large proportion of the crews. We have sadly already lost two Indian mariners and one remains missing in such incidents. I know that the House joins me in condoling their deaths.




"Opposition is completely rejected, demoralised," says BJP on No Trust Motion to be brought against Speaker Om Birla

BJP MP Sujeet Kumar says, "Article 94 of the Constitution gives members the right to move a motion to remove the Speaker. But the question is, why has the opposition brought this motion at this time? Is it because the Speaker has done something wrong? 


"No. It's because the opposition has been completely rejected, demoralised, and is being consistently rejected by the people of the country. So they just want to stage some drama and theatrics... 

The House will function according to rules and procedures... Democracy needs opposition parties, and we need a strong opposition. There are many issues they can raise, and the government is ready to discuss all possible issues with them."







On a motion seeking the removal of Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla, Congress MP Mallu Ravi says, "We are bringing a motion to replace the present Speaker for some reasons. 


"The Leader of the Opposition is not allowed to speak in the Parliament. The Parliament is the place where it is meant for debate, not for suppressing debate... Not only are these about eight MPs from the opposition party trying to demand the right of the MPs to speak in the parliament. They were suspended for the total session... 


"When opposition and ruling party MPs are openly making derogatory allegations against the former prime ministers, particularly the first prime minister, no action is taken... Whenever there are controversial bills, the Speaker is taking the stand of the ruling party as if he were an active political man...".  


"Our parliamentary democracy stands strong when we allow the opposition to express their views... That is not being done, and we have asked for the resolution to be passed so that the present Speaker will be replaced...". 







The second phase of the budget session of Parliament will commence today and will continue till the 2nd of April


External Affairs Minister Dr S Jaishankar will make a statement in both Houses of Parliament today on the situation in West Asia. 


CPI MP P Sandosh has given suspension of Business Notice in Rajya Sabha under Rule 267 and demanded to discuss the serious crisis in the Gulf region arising from the prolonged conflict between the United States and Iran, and the urgent need for intervention to protect the Indian community.  


Congress MP KC Venugopal gives Adjournment Motion Notice in Lok Sabha to discuss emerging challenges relating to energy security due to the rapidly evolving situation in West Asia.  


Congress MP Manish Tewari gives Adjournment Motion Notice in Lok Sabha 


The motion reads, "I move that this House do suspend Question Hour, Zero Hour and all other listed business of the day to take up the serious concerns emanating from the escalating conflict in West Asia, and its implications on India's energy security."  


On motion seeking removal of Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla, BJP leader Dilip Ghosh says, "Every single person, no matter who the opponent is, MPs stand up in Parliament and praise the Speaker Om Birla. 


"I have also seen him for five years, and he has not refused anyone. He gives everyone a chance.  But these parties have become so bankrupt that they are lagging behind in every election. Their existence is in danger, hence they are ready to cross any limit. 


"To undermine the constitutional system, they have turned Parliament into a den of politics, and the way these people are behaving disrespectfully against a successful Speaker like Om Birla, they will have to suffer the consequences of it."



ends 

Explosive Monday : Parliament session to Debate and Vote on Motions against Lok Sabha Speaker Birla and Rahul Gandhi


- Nirendra Dev


 The session opens with India’s constitutional machinery under scrutiny from all sides.


Remove the Speaker. Ban Rahul. Parliament’s Explosive Return



Courtesy - The Raisina Hills 







The ruling BJP issues three-line whip for March 9-10 as opposition’s no-confidence notice against Lok Sabha Speaker comes up for debate — and Nishikant Dubey’s substantive motion seeks Rahul Gandhi’s lifetime election ban. 


The second part of Parliament’s Budget Session reconvenes Monday, carrying two politically explosive flashpoints — a no-confidence motion against Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla, and a substantive motion seeking the cancellation of Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi’s membership and a lifetime ban from contesting elections.


The BJP has issued a three-line whip to all its Lok Sabha members, directing mandatory presence on both March 9 and 10. 


“All members of the BJP in Lok Sabha are therefore requested to be positively present in the House on both the days and support the government’s stand,” the party directive stated, citing “important legislative business” — though BJP sources described it as a “routine parliamentary directive.”  


The opposition, led by Congress, submitted a no-confidence notice in February 2026 seeking the removal of Speaker Om Birla, signed by 118 MPs. The notice accuses Birla of acting in a partisan manner. Congress’s Rajya Sabha MP Jairam Ramesh said: “We had given specific instances of partisan behaviour by the Speaker, while false allegations were levelled against the opposition members.”


In a rare constitutional moment, Birla — who represents Kota in Rajasthan — will be seated among MPs rather than presiding over the House. Parliamentary rules entitle him to defend himself when the notice is debated. He has not chaired proceedings since the notice was filed last month.  







Rahul Gandhi in the Crosshairs


The session will also witness a politically charged debate on BJP MP Nishikant Dubey’s substantive motion against Rahul Gandhi. Dubey has sought cancellation of Gandhi’s Lok Sabha membership and a lifetime bar from contesting elections, alleging that Gandhi visits foreign nations including Thailand, Cambodia, and Vietnam — joining hands with the Soros Foundation, USAID, and Ford Foundation — and “colludes with anti-India forces.”








The second part of the Budget session will see curious debate and dramatic turns on the motion moved against Rahul Gandhi. The Lok Sabha Speaker may be consulted on whether to send Dubey’s substantive motion to the House privilege panel, the ethics committee, or place it directly before the Lower House.

The precedent is sobering. 

Trinamool Congress MP Mahua Moitra was expelled by a House vote in 2023 on a similar motion in the cash-for-query case — though she returned to Parliament by winning the 2024 Lok Sabha election from Krishnanagar, West Bengal.


If admitted and passed, the motion would trigger a House committee investigation, a defined timeframe for a report, and ultimately a House vote — potentially invoking Parliament’s power to expel members for serious misconduct.








ends

Nand Kishore Yadav as Nagaland Governor; What PM Modi is telling Nagas ??? ----- Courtesy The Raisina Hills

Whether that constitutional role extends to nudging a peace process — or simply managing the status quo — remains to be seen." Courtesy...