Donald Trump is no longer just the President of the US. He is the topper among the politicians who thrive with Falsehood.
He is a dictator. He is a destroyer-dictator. And worse - he is unpredictable.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi realises by now how dangerous is to have a 'friend' like Trump. But for Pakistan .... Trump as the savior and "mentor" and who takes them on his lap ... he can be a killer ... he pushes Islamabad underneath a bus.
He has just not pushed Pakistan under a running bus. He has banner the driver from applying brakes. The reference is to Donald Trump's new bomb explosion ...
"Pakistan has been doing nuclear tests".
Connect the dots. Operation Sindoor destroyed and harmed Pakistan below the belt.
The Hindi version would have been from the 'backside'.
"Faat ke haath mein aa gayi" type. And the manner Trump sought to embarrass Modi and India since Operation Sindoor -- one can be sure yes ... something was on in Pakistan between Chemistry and Physics and both US money and men (as being speculated) were harmed.
Poor 'firangi' ... uska bhi faat..... (again the Hindi ... and one is so used to it in Delhi region)
On a serious note -- Trump has said that Pakistan and China, apart from Russia and North Korea, are testing nuclear weapons.
"Russia's testing and China's testing, but they don't talk about it. You know, we're an open society. We're different. We talk about it...
They don't have reporters that are going to be writing about it."
He said Pakistan also ! "Certainly North Korea's been testing. Pakistan's been testing." China has rejected Trump's claims. But Islamabad is scared of annoying the new-found God father.
And certainly -- from Indian or international point of view .... one can only assert - The President of US cannot be telling all that just for nothing ... he has had special sittings and even hosted lunch for the disgraced army chief and a joker-variety Prime Minister.
For India - Trump has helped a lot.
Two points - One -- Pakistan has been left exposed and naked. A country with 'begging bowl' in front of the IMF is doing Nuke-tests.
And secondly -- Now India can attack Pakistan much 'decisively' as military commanders have been saying and the Modi Govt should go for new updated and modernised nuke tests.
The fact of the matter vis-a-vis Nuke fields is -- Russia and North Korea have been doing something in the recent past.
In 2021, a group of American scientists have said about nuclear related activities even in China. Officially China has been not testing since 1996. But computer simulation - as they say has been going in China and Russia and perhaps also in Pakstan and North Korea.
While Pakistan's fissile material could fuel up to 200 warheads by 2028, including tactical nukes, it's China's advancements—like the Fractional Orbital Bombardment System (FOBS) tested in 2021—that pose the gravest threat.
FOBS deploys warheads into partial Earth orbits, evading predictable trajectories and India's nascent Prithvi Defence Vehicle (PDV) interceptors. Lingering doubts over Pokhran-II's 1998 thermonuclear test, alleged by DRDO scientist K Santhanam as a "fizzle" yielding just 10-15 kt instead of 200 kt, further erode confidence.
Now, Trump's move of US testing nuclear weapons, and his claims of China and Pakistan also covertly doing so, have seemingly opened a window for India to conduct Pokhran-III, which would validate India's hydrogen bomb efficacy and miniaturising yields for Agni-VI Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles (ICBMs), or K-5 submarine-launched missiles.
Extra Info:
Ambiguity is an art and an effective tool when a country's leadership handles matters such as nuclear tests.
India has pledged not to be be the first to use nuclear weapons. Nuclear weapons would only be used in response to a nuclear attack on Indian territory or Indian forces.
** India also pledged not to use nuclear weapons against countries that do not possess them.
Retaliatory nuclear attacks can only be authorized by the civilian political leadership through the Nuclear Command Authority.
While the policy has been consistently upheld, some defense experts and politicians have suggested it might need to be reconsidered based on evolving circumstances,




No comments:
Post a Comment