As a tit for tat response, the Modi Govt has suspended the Indus Waters Treaty following the Pahalgam terror attack, halting the supply of 39 billion cubic meters of water annually from rivers such as the Indus, Jhelum, and Chenab originating from Jammu and Kashmir.
The decision is poised to have far-reaching consequences for Pakistan.
Look what happens to Muslim and Pakistan appeasing political party.
Former Home Minister and Congress leader P Chidambaram says: ‘Govt should weigh its options and choose the most effective one. Congress will support it’
The country is heavily dependent on the Indus River system for its agriculture, which forms the backbone of its economy.
Nearly 90% of Pakistan’s irrigation depends on water from the Indus basin.
Any disruption — or even the perception of future disruption — in water supply from the western rivers could exacerbate water scarcity, reduce crop yields, and fuel domestic unrest, especially in the already water-stressed provinces of Punjab and Sindh.
The CCS concluded that Pakistan’s continued support for terrorism violates the very spirit of the treaty.
Rather than a formal withdrawal, India is opting to freeze all treaty-related cooperation — including technical meetings, data sharing, and water flow notifications.
The Indus Waters Treaty was signed on September 19, 1960, by Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru and then-Pakistani President Ayub Khan.
The treaty has endured through wars and diplomatic breakdowns, but the recent attack in Pahalgam, which claimed the lives of security personnel and civilians, appears to have redrawn the lines.
Strategically, India's move is aimed at applying pressure on Pakistan's establishment by converting a long-standing symbol of cooperation into a lever of deterrence. For years, India refrained from linking water diplomacy with terrorism, but the Pahalgam attack seems to have redrawn that line.
The message is clear: Cross-border terror will now invite strategic costs. This shift could force Islamabad to reconsider its policy calculus, especially if international support for India’s position builds.
On the international front, Pakistan may seek the World Bank's intervention — the treaty's guarantor. However, India is expected to argue that no country can expect the benefits of a peacetime agreement while actively undermining peace.
India is expected to accelerate development on a number of hydroelectric and storage projects along the western rivers — including Pakal Dul, Ratle, Kiru, and Sawalkot — all permissible under the treaty but often delayed due to Pakistani objections.
No comments:
Post a Comment