Saturday, October 4, 2025

Being candid about wars b/w Israel and Hamas or between Russia and Ukraine, Indian Air Force chief A P Singh says "World must learn from India" how to end a military conflict

“We stopped the war very quickly. Yes, they were on the back foot, no doubt, but what were our objectives? Our objective was anti-terrorism. We had to strike them. We had done that. So if our objectives have been met, then why should we not terminate a conflict?," the Air Chief Marshal A P Singh has told Air Force veterans.


His case being Operation Sindoor was brought to an end as soon as its anti-terror objectives were achieved and moreover the Pakistani authorities had made a request for the same through its DGMO.

Donald Trump may his fables but it is also true Operation Sindoor had exposed the limitations of both China -made and US-made jets.

Air Chief Marshal argued that prolonging the conflict during Operation Sindoor in May 2025 would have left adverse fallout including 'delay' in further defence preparedness.






"Why should we carry on? Because any conflict has a lot of price which has to be paid.”  

The fact of the matter had the Operation Sindoor continued even for a couple of days more it is certain the Indian Air Force was all set to hit hard at all the Pak-bases in the west of the Indus. 

No doubt even an observer like Shekhar Gupta - not in the Modi-fan club - said:

"The PAF was no longer up for a fight".


The Indian Air Force did a commendable job when it launched missiles to hit every PAF base, air defence location and critical weapons storage across the entire length and breadth of Pakistan.


In fact, the only time the PAF was seen in an attacking mode was when the two JF-17s launched Chinese CM-400AKG anti-radiation missiles to target the S-400 radar at Adampur. But this attempt too was foiled by IAF. 


Air Force chief A P Singh was categorical on why 'ending' the conflict (or to pause it) was a well thought out decision.

"Saalon sal beet gayen (The wars that started between Russia and Ukraine or the one fought by Israel are going on and on ... with no sign of end)", he said.

"This is because no one (at the level of those fighting these wars) is thinking abou terminating the wars. 

"Even India was told after Operation Sindoor ... aur thoda karni chahiye tha ... We should have done more. We ended the war so quickly and abruptly.... Pakistan was on backfoot no doubt... But what we were our objectives".

Then he argued -- ".... Why should we carry on. Any conflict has many prices attached. It will affect our preparedness for the next one (war). It will affect our economy and it will affect the general progress of the country. I think this is what the world is forgetting".

"They seemed to have no idea what was their target when the war(s) were started. The goal post is being shifted over the years....Ego is coming in between and this is where the world has to learn a lesson from India on how to start and terminate a conflict at the earliest possible opportunity".  





Talking about Operation Sindoor and the Indian Air Force; one can say sit did not a typical self-limiting objective, IAF would not be satisfied simply fighting and bringing down Pak jets. Overall 'national interests and objectives count'. 


Air chief  A P Singh said Indian objectives were achieved during Operation Sindoor.

The targets included 

- Demonstrably deliver counter-force punishment on the enemy

- Destroy headquarters and other hubs of the Lashkar-e-Taiba at Muridke near Lahore 

** and Jaish-e-Mohammed at Bahawalpur. 

-- Defend and outsmart any counter-strike by the Pakistani forces.  On the other hand, Pak Air Force were defensive right from the word 'go' and remained the same all along.


The PAF was unable to rose in combat to challenge scores of IAF aircraft that launched missiles to hit every PAF base, air defence location and critical weapons.

-- 

It failed to protect any of the predetermined IAF targets, despite well known fact that after Pahalgam attack, India was determined to do something solid.

- PAF could not interrupt the strike package. It failed to protect several critical air defence and SAM batteries from Harop/Harpy drone attacks.



 



ends

"Hindu Rashtriyata always keeps us together" -- RSS chief Bhagwat :::: Full Text of the speech by Sarsanghchalak Dr Mohan Bhagwat on the occasion of Vijayadashmi 2025 Utsav, Nagpur. Oct 2



Full text:


"We have gathered today on Vijayadashami. Today is the centenary of the initiation of Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh’s activities. Coincidentally, this year also marks the 350th anniversary of Shri Guru Teg Bahadur ji Maharaj’s martyrdom. 

He became a shield and sacrificed himself to protect the Hindu society from the atrocities of invaders from a foreign religion. 

According to the English calendar, today is the birth anniversary of Mahatma Gandhi. He was not only one of the foremost among those who fought for our freedom but also has a special place among those who envisioned a post-independence Bharat based on Bharat’s Swa (selfhood). 






Today is also the birth anniversary of former Prime Minister late Shri Lal Bahadur Shastri ji, an embodiment of simplicity, humility, integrity, and determination who sacrificed his life for the nation.


They are exemplary icons of devotion, dedication and service to the nation for us. They teach us how a person can become human in the real sense and live life accordingly.


The present national and global circumstances require Bharatiyas to lead a similar life enriched with personal and national character. This is evident in a review of our collective progress as an independent nation over the past year.


Current Scenario: Hope and Challenges


The past period has, on the one hand, strengthened our faith and hope, while on the other hand, presented us with both old and new challenges in greater clarity. It has also determined our future duties. The Maha Kumbh mela, held in Prayagraj earlier this year, set a new world record by breaking all past records of the number of pilgrims from across Bharat and surpassing all benchmarks of good organisation. It awakened faith and unity across Bharat.


On 22 April, in Pahalgam, cross-border terrorists killed 26 Bharatiya civilian tourists after asking them about their Hindu faith. 


The attack led to a wave of grief, sadness and anger across Bharat. After careful planning, the government provided a fitting response to this attack in May. 

During this entire period, we stood witness to the firmness of the country’s leadership, the valour and war-readiness of our armed forces, as well as the determination and unity of our society. 


However, at the same time, it has become evident to us that, while maintaining a policy and spirit of friendship, we must remain as vigilant as possible and further develop our security capabilities.





The responses of other countries around the world to this entire incident revealed who our friends are in the global arena and also tested the extent to which they are willing to stand by us.


The extremist Naxalist movement has been largely brought under control due to the firm actions of the government and the realisation among people about the hollowness of their ideology and cruelty. 


The root of Naxalites’ popularity in these areas lay in exploitation and injustice, lack of development, and absence of sensitivity about these matters in the administration. Now that these obstacles have been removed, a comprehensive action plan is required to ensure justice, development, goodwill, empathy, and harmony in these regions.


In the economic sphere, our situation has been improving according to various prevailing indicators. The enthusiasm among ordinary citizens to make our nation a global leader is clearly visible in our industry, and especially among the younger generation. However, the prevailing economic system has specific flaws that are increasingly becoming evident worldwide: the widening gap between rich and poor, the concentration of economic power, the strengthening of new mechanisms that enable easier exploitation by exploiters, damage to the environment, and the rise of transactionalism and inhumanity instead of genuine interpersonal relationships.


We will need to reconsider our approach on some issues to ensure that these flaws and the tariff policy adopted by America, based solely on its self-interest, do not pose a challenge for us. 

The world operates through mutual interdependence. 


By becoming Aatmanirbhar (self-reliant) and being cognizant of global unity, we must ensure that this global interdependence does not become a compulsion for us, and we are able to act according to our own will. There is no substitute for Swadeshi and Swavalamban.


The harmful consequences of the materialist and consumerist development model adopted worldwide, based on a materialist and compartmental outlook, are increasingly becoming evident everywhere. In Bharat too, due to the same model, irregular and unpredictable rainfall, landslides, drying up of glaciers, and other similar effects have intensified over the last 3-4 years. The entire water supply of Southwest Asia originates in the Himalayas. The occurrence of these disasters in the Himalayas should be considered as a warning bell for Bharat and other countries of South Asia.


In recent years, there has been considerable turmoil in our neighbouring countries. The regime change in Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, and more recently Nepal due to violent outburst of public anger is a concern for us. The forces wanting to create such disturbances in Bharat are active inside as well as outside our country. The natural and immediate causes for discontent are the disconnect between the government and the society and the lack of able and people-oriented administrators. However, violent outbursts do not have the power to bring about the desirable change. The society can achieve such transformation only through democratic means. Otherwise, in such violent circumstances, there is a possibility that dominant powers of the world try to find opportunities to play their own games. 


These neighbouring countries are linked with Bharat on the basis of both culture and long-standing ties between citizens. 

In one way, they are part of our own family. Peace, stability, prosperity, and ensuring comfort and wellbeing in these countries; more than protection of our own interests, it is a necessity arising out of our natural belongingness with these countries.


Across the globe, scientific progress, the ability of technology to make many aspects of human life more convenient, and greater interconnectedness between countries due to communication and global trade present a positive picture. 





However, there is a considerable difference between the pace of scientific and technological progress and the pace at which humans adapt to these. Due to this, ordinary people may end up facing numerous problems. Similarly, we are also witnessing other problems, such as the ongoing wars and conflicts (both large and small) across the globe, the fury of nature due to environmental damage, weakening of social and family bonds, and growing misconduct and hostility towards others in everyday life. Efforts have been made to address all these problems, but they have failed to stop them from worsening or provide a comprehensive solution. 


All countries are facing a threat from perverted and hostile forces that believe that the complete destruction of all bonds that unite, such as culture, faith, tradition and the like, is necessary for resolving these problems. These forces will aggravate the social ills, conflict and violence affecting humanity. In Bharat too, we are experiencing all these circumstances in various ways. The world is eagerly awaiting solutions that are based on Bharatiya philosophy.


What strengthens our hope and reassures us is that across the country and especially among the younger generation, the nationalist spirit and cultural belonging are consistently increasing. In addition to Swayamsevaks, various religious and social institutions, as well as individuals, are coming forward to selflessly serve underprivileged sections of society. Consequently, the society’s self-reliance, ability to solve problems encountered, and capacity to fulfil unmet needs have improved. Swayamsevaks are observing an increased desire in society to engage directly in Sangh activities and social work. Among intellectuals, there is a growing reflection on exploring models of development and public administration that are based on our country’s worldview, outlook, and needs, rather than prevailing global models.


Bharat’s Philosophical Outlook

All our modern thinkers – from Swami Vivekanand to Mahatma Gandhi ji, Deendayal Upadhyaya ji, Ram Manohar Lohia ji – and other greater leaders in our society, who have tried to reflect on Bharat and the world based on a Bharatiya outlook, have all pointed in the same direction while addressing all these problems. The modern worldview is not entirely misplaced, but it is incomplete. This is why some countries and classes have experienced an improvement in material development. This has not happened for all. Leave aside others, some researchers have observed that if Bharat were to live a so-called prosperous and advanced material life like that in America, it would require resources equivalent to five more Earths. This is why new problems are arising for humanity and nature alongside progress, which are becoming existential crises. The root cause of this is inadequacy of the outlook.


Our Sanatan, spiritual, holistic and integral outlook has the power to ensure the material wellbeing of an individual, alongside the development of the mind, intellect, and spirituality. It can also ensure the progress of human communities and the world as a whole, alongside individual development. Finally, alongside ensuring economic wellbeing according to individual needs and aspirations, our outlook also develops a sense of duty and a sense of belonging and oneness towards others. This is because we have realized the principle that unites all. 


Through that, for thousands of years, we had evolved a beautiful, prosperous, and peaceful lifestyle, which recognizes the importance of interpersonal relations and respects the cooperative coexistence of humans and the nature. The world requires a new model based on this holistic and integrated outlook, one that meets the needs of today’s world and provides a permanent solution for the problems which humanity is facing today. 


Destiny demands that Bharatiya citizens provide a model worthy of emulation through their own example.


The Sangh’s Vision

The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh has completed 100 years of its work. After imbibing the values and Samskaras of the Sangh, Swayamsevaks have actively engaged in various aspects of social life, as well as diverse organizations and institutions. This includes both local and national level organizations. Swayamsevaks continue to cooperate and engage in dialogue with numerous individuals who are actively working in society. 


The Sangh has drawn certain observations and conclusions based on its collective experience.


Bharat’s rise is gaining momentum. However, we are still operating within those policies and frameworks whose inadequacies have been exposed to us. It is also true that, alongside the world, we have moved ahead in those ways to such an extent that it won’t be possible to make immediate changes. In the long run, we will need to make gradual shifts. However, there is no other way to protect ourselves from the challenges that we and the world are currently encountering or will encounter in the future. 


We need to create a successful development model based on our holistic and integrated outlook and present it to the world. 

A world blindly running after material wellbeing and desires needs to be shown the path of Dharma, which transcends the paths of worship and customs and traditions, which connects all, which takes all together, and which ensures collective progress.


The task of creating an ideal model of the country for the world to emulate cannot be the sole responsibility of the government. This is because the state’s capacity and desire to bring about change are limited. The inspiration and ability to do so ultimately come through the will of society. Thus, social awareness and change in societal conduct are necessary for bringing about social change. Changes in society’s behaviour do not come through speeches or texts. We need to create active social awareness, and those undertaking this need to become living examples of change. At every level, there should be persons who can become role models, who are devoted to society, who embody transparency and selflessness, and who consider the entire society as their own and conduct themselves with good behaviour towards it. We need local social leadership that can inspire society as role models while staying with them. This is why: social transformation through Character building (Vyakti Nirman) and systemic change through social transformation is the correct path for bringing about change in the world. This has been the collective experience of Swayamsevaks

In every society, the system for creating such individuals remains active. This system was destroyed in our society during the long period of foreign invasion. They must be re-established in a manner suited for the present time, within our homes, our education system, and various dimensions of society. We need to create individuals who can undertake this work. Even after mentally accepting this idea, actually bringing it into practice requires changing habits of mind, speech and action. A system is needed for this. The Sangh Shakha is such a system. 






For the past 100 years, Sangh Karyakartas have consistently sustained this system in all kinds of circumstances. We must continue to do so in the future as well. This is why Swayamsevaks must undertake the discipline of changing their own habits by actively participating in the daily


Shakha activities. The Shakha exists for this purpose: to develop individual qualities as well as team working skills and spirit to create a favourable atmosphere for better basic human values and solidarity within the society, by actively engaging and cooperating in activities of the society.


The most important factor in any nation’s progress is its social unity. Our country has immense diversity. Many languages, multiple religions, diverse lifestyles and a variety of cuisines due to geographic diversity, caste and sub-caste – all these diversities have existed for a long time. Over the past thousand years, some foreign communities have also entered Bharat from outside our borders. While foreigners have left, our own brothers who accepted these religions and continue to follow them are still present in Bharat. 


According to Bharatiya traditions, all are welcome and accepted. We look at them as ours rather than as the ‘other’. We regard these diversities as specialities and understand the tendency to take pride in them. However, these distinct identities should not cause division. Despite all our distinct identities, we are all parts of a larger society. 


As a society, a country, a culture, and a nation, we are united. We must remember that this larger identity is above everything else for us. Because of this, our attitudes towards each other in society are required to be harmonious and respectful. Everyone has their own beliefs, icons and places of worship. 



We should be careful not to disrespect these in thought, word, or action. Awareness must be created for this. All of us should follow rules, maintain order, and demonstrate harmonious behaviour. Taking the law into one’s hands and coming out on the streets or engaging in hooliganism and violence, on a small matter or merely out of suspicion- this tendency is not correct. Show of strength is deliberately done to provoke a particular community. The consequences of falling into their trap are evil, both in the short and long term. It is necessary to curb such tendencies. 


The government should operate in accordance with the law, rather than being influenced by bias or undue pressure from anyone. However, the good people of the society (Sajjan Shakti) and the younger generation also needs to be vigilant and organized, they will also have to intervene if necessary.

Dr. Ambedkar Sahab referred to the foundation of this unity as ‘inherent cultural unity’. Bharatiya culture has been a special feature of Bharat since ancient times. It is completely inclusive. It teaches us to respect and embrace all forms of diversity as it is rooted in Bharat’s spiritual truth and qualities such as compassion, purity and discipline – that is, in Dharma. 


As this nation’s children, Hindu society has adopted this in their way of life as a tradition; which is why it is also called Hindu Sanskriti. It has originated through the penance of Rishis of Bharat. The prosperous and secure environment of ancient Bharat allowed them to do so. This Samskriti has flourished, remained unbroken and reached us today because of the perseverance, sacrifices and dedication of our ancestors. Rashtriyata (or nationalist spirit) is conducting ourselves according to our Bharatiya Sanskriti, cherishing the memory of our ancestors by having a sense of pride and following their conduct, and by devoting ourselves to our divine motherland which has enabled everything. 


This Hindu Rashtriyata always keeps us together while accepting and respecting all diversities. We don’t have a conception of ‘nation state’. States form and decline, while nation remains eternal. We should never forget this foundation of our unity.

The strength, virtue and organized character of the Hindu society guarantee national unity, oneness and development. 

The Hindu society is the responsible society for Bharat. It is an inclusive society. 


It is free of and will remain free from a mentality ‘us and them’ which creates divisions on the basis of superficial differences of many names and forms. The Hindu society is upholder and guardian of the noble idea of ‘Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam’. 


This is why it is the duty of the Hindu society to make Bharat prosperous and a country that contributes immensely to the entire world. The Sangh has been working to organize the entire Hindu society which on the basis of its organized strength, safeguarding its Dharma, which can offer a new path to the world, will make Bharat prosperous. An organized society can fulfill all its duties on its own. 

No separate effort will be needed from outside.


If we need to fulfill this vision of the society, then both individual and national character will have to be strengthened, within Individuals and communities alike. Sangh Shakha provides a clear conception of our national identity and pride. Through the daily programmes conducted in the Shakha, Swayamsevaks develop their personality, capability, leadership, devotion and wisdom.


Therefore during the Shatabdi Varsh, the Sangh will attempt to ensure that its work of Vyakti Nirman spreads across the country and the Panch Parivartan programme, which aims to bring gradual changes in social conduct, is adopted by all sections of the society through the examples of Swayamsevaks. 


This is a programme for ensuring that individuals and families incorporate these five initiatives into their own conduct: social harmony, preservation of family values, environmental protection, selfhood and self-reliance, and adherence to legal, civic, and constitutional duties. Doing so will set the examples for the entire society. 


The changes are simple and easy to incorporate into daily life. These have been discussed in detail during various Sangh programmes in the last 2-3 years. Apart from Sangh Swayamsevaks, other organizations and individuals are also conducting similar programmes in the society. Sangh Swayamsevaks are trying to coordinate and assist with them.


From time to time in world history, Bharat has played a significant role – it has restored the lost balance of the world, providing a global Dharma that instills a sense of restraint and discipline in global life. 


Our ancient ancestors organized the diverse society living in Bharat into a nation to fulfill this responsibility. This was the vision of the auspicious outcome of the prosperity and development of the capabilities of independent Bharat that stood before the pioneers of our freedom struggle and national renaissance.


Former Sanghchalak of Bengal Prant Late Keshab Chandra Chakraborty ji has described this beautifully in a poem:–


Bharatiya Sanskriti had spread as far as Sinhal (Sri Lanka) and Java. There were Mutts and temples everywhere, where fragrance of life was like flowers. Enemity and conflict in countries also used to get resolved after listening to Bharat’s sweet and wisdom-filled voice.


Come, let us once again establish this true identity of Bharat in the world, in a manner that aligns with the present-day national and global circumstances. 


To fulfill this duty given by our forefathers — a duty that is also the need of the world today — let us all unite, walk together, and proceed on our path of duty. On this auspicious occasion of Vijayadashami, let us perform Simollanghan with this resolve.


|| Bharat Mata Ki Jay ||






"Tumko Mila kya" :::: Modi has timed the “Pakistan-plus-Muslim card” pretty well :::::: Even Cricket is no longer a gentleman's game .... Jingoism has replaced Nationalism .... :::: Rediscover the joys of living without sheer hatred :: But Pakistan is Different


(It's undeniable that 'repeated' reference to Muslims and the "Pakistan angle" is always a successful attempt to polarize the Indian elections -- but this may also cause  further religious divides among the electorate.)


***

With this "Operation Sindoor vis-a-vis India-Pakistan cricket stadium" logic, the BJP could be hoping to deal another blow to their political detractors' 'Secular' brand of politics.



Sonia Gandhi and frame of Rajiv 



****

I started these blogs way back in 2010 August. During its launch --- with the smugness of a shy operator -  I had an underlining theme -- 

"A little bit more than patriotism. A little bit lower than jingoism."  As a matter of fact this word was suggested by a Ahmedabad-based friend and a Sickular product -- I would tease him. 

In gratitude and in a typical 'Mallu (Keralite) anguish' - he had easily dubbed me as a 'blind Modi Bhakt'. Many years later when I reached the 'joblessness' stage amid personal agony and my mother's death -- he asked me acidly : 

"Tum ko salah mila kya ?".  

He knew by then (as my mom expired in Nov 2019) colleagues in news agency UNI headquarters started behaving peculiar and cheap. 


The fact of the matter is our journalism world in Delhi is 'cheap' in more ways than one.  My experience with two other news agencies were no better. Of course classic was Press Trust of India's ever "love-able" salutation:

"Udhar riot chal raha hae, tum khana kha rahe ho".  




Sincerely yours !




Nevertheless, my personal tragedy and comedy combo is not the big picture issue. 



The much important and bigger issue is 'we have started justifying jingoism' as my or Cricket team's love for the country. I am not entirely opposed to the idea of Indian squad declining to take a trophy from a Pakistani neta who also is PCB chief. Mohsin Naqvi social media post earlier was highly provocative. 


But we must note the bigger subject matter of debate is -- the fact that the "bitterness" over Pakistan exists in India even in normal times.


The next important issue is -- how often this is tapped so well during elections and otherwise by the BJP leadership. The Lotus party's poll managers - and especially Namo himself and Home Minister Amit Shah know it well how to garner votes.



This is where Rahul Gandhi's 'vote chori' allegations etc etc simply fail. 




 



Of course replacing Jingoism for Nationalism has helped the BJP in the past. The Modi regime has also known it pretty well on how to make a political capital of subjects like Military Memorial and National War Memorial. In the process, Patriotism has been suitably used to create a powerful campaign against Caste, Creed, Language and State (or Religion). 

We do not suggest that Moditva's definition of Nationalism has able to take the 'larger national interests' above all narrow domestic walls. 


But it has been successful to a great extent when it comes to Indian diaspora and the manner they have been rescued in different countries during different challenging circumstances and brought back home.  As a party which has lost three consecutive polls, the Congress party has committed one big mistake by not being gracious. 


A loser in a democratic election and that for a party which has ruled for maximum number of decades; the Congress should not have been so bitter. A party that lost election should not be having the grudges on the new 'role' that has been conferred to it by the people of India. 


Equally of course, the winner must never get arrogant. Winning or losing election is part of the game. Late Rajiv Gandhi himself summed it up better when after the 1989 defeat he had said -- "Elections are won, elections are lost....". 








As a result, a new diction has been created. And it has its merrits.

There is a growing sentiment within the BJP and more importantly among a substantial support base among Hindus is that the “secularism,” as practiced earlier under Congress -- has been essentially “anti-Hindu". 

This is the catch.

Hence showing Pakistanis in poor light at the world's sporting stage is also to appeal to that core voters in India - who grudges Muslims and who still grudges the Partition of India. 

 





Prime Minister Narendra Modi was not being novice when he tweeted that India's three-zero win in the just concluded Asia Cup cricket extravaganza was like Operation Sindoor.

"Operation Sindoor on the games field. The outcome is the same - India wins! Congrats to our cricketers," Modi said in a post on X.  


The reference to Operation Sindoor and connecting it with Pakistan's loss to India in the Asia Cup title alluded to a fact - sports or military, India humbled Pakistan rather convincingly. 


India's devastating airstrikes at Pakistan's terror infrastructure and military installations in May had left that country's airspace defenceless. The bombing by using Russia-made missiles and other indigenous tools eventually led Pak DGMO dial his Indian counterpart and request for a ceasefire. 


Even Pak airports were severely damaged and several terror camps were vanquished and terrorists and relatives were killed.   

Big jets made by China and the US were brought down.


The BJP and Modi have always banked heavily on the spirit of Hindutva (literally “Hindu-ness”). This was missing in the politics pushed by Atal Bihari Vajpayee.


The Hindutva political ideology - as also cherished by the influential RSS - advocates for Hindu supremacy and seeks to transform India possibly into an ethno-religious nation.


When Indian government green signaled India's participation at the tournament-  actually a trap was created for Pakistanis and they kept walking deep step by step during the tournament. 


Indian skipper Sunil Kumar Yadav even refused to handshake with the rival captain.

This was not even heard in cricket during the era of bodyline bowling between Australia and England.


The BJP is always seen 'comfortable' increasingly relying on the party’s familiar tactic of seeking votes by evoking inherent religious divisions in the country of 1.4 billion people.

It's true Communalism is a strict anti-thesis to both democracy and religion.  But at the same time Prime Minister Modi loves to call India/Bharat the 'mother of democracy'.


But the main opposition Congress and other parties also go soft on Hindutva issues these days because they all want to be "politically correct".


In 2024, there was a can of worms opened by the BJP when Modi himself dubbed the Congress party’s election manifesto as “a footprint of the Muslim League”.


After all, this party is held responsible for the partition of the Indian subcontinent and for creation of Pakistan in 1947. Even Pakistan split later in 1971 with the creation of another country called Bangladesh.








Rahul loses polls and then the 'plots' too ::  


**
In 2024 Lok Sabha polls, trying to present himself as a primary challenger to the PM, Congress leader Rahul Gandhi had stressed on the fair distribution of wealth as the biggest challenge of capitalism. But this is hardly spoken these days. 

** Take another case when Pakistani minister Chaudhry Fawad Hussain, applauded Rahul Gandhi last year and said the Congress leader had a socialist in him, the BJP quickly joined the issue.


Defence Minister Rajnath Singh said, “There must be a reason behind this deep love [for Rahul Gandhi] from a country that has been trying to destabilize India. It is a matter of grave concern, and India wants to know the reason for this love.” 


These certainly end up influencing the minds of at least a few hundred voters. 

  

ends 
 




Why Bangladesh matters for polls in Assam and Bengal ? :::: Next 20 months .... India will enter hyped electoral battle and an era of fierce political maneuvering ::: Dhaka siege in 2016 and Hasina's ouster in 2024 had deeper messages

Elections are round the corner in three eastern Indian states - Bihar, West Bengal and Assam -- and all three share borders with neighbouring countries.


Assam and West Bengal have Bangladesh alongside while Bihar has Nepal.


There have been unprecedented political turmoil in last two years in the region. Myanmar is another country that is vital to north east India.




Blogger 


 Bihar goes to the polls in November and poll dates will be announced soon. Two key eastern states West Bengal and Assam will have elections done by April-May 2026 along with two southern states of Tamil Nadu and Kerala. The BJP has deep stakes in Mamata Banerjee-ruled West Bengal and also in Assam -- where it came to power in 2016.


By early 2027 - elections will be held in Uttar Pradesh - that sends 80 MPs to Lok Sabha and also border states such as Manipur and Punjab and also Goa.  

In August 2024, Sheikh Hasina was ousted and those who came to power by default were radical Islamists. India and other key players in South Asia should have sensed some of these fault lines.

Eight years prior to that the 'Dhaka siege' on July 1-2, 2016, was one of the deadliest attacks in Bangladesh. 

The Islamists had warned Bangladesh it was now part of a bigger battlefield to establish a cross-border “caliphate". Things should have been taken more seriously by Sheikh Hasina and also in Delhi.


Analysts did see these as "serious developments", suspecting a large section of Muslims in Bangladesh to pledge support to “the Khilāfah". These should ot have been overlooked like the manner both Dhaka under Hasina and New Delhi under Narendra Modi handled the situations.


During my visit to Dhaka in December 2017, one young student at the Mujib Memorial in Dhanmondi had said: “In Bangladesh, we still have two kinds of fanatics and two kinds of intellectuals. One side is always with India and the other side is always with Pakistan.”



Mujib Memorial - now destroyed in Dhaka



But a clear India-Pakistan angle to what a Bangladeshi does and says certainly implied grave security threats for Bangladesh and India's northeastern states. 

Needless to add, porous borders and the complex sociopolitical background of Tripura, Assam and West Bengal make them vulnerable for such Islamic activities.

No marks for guessing - all these elements with be at play during forthcoming assembly elections in Bihar, West Bengal and Assam.

All three states have different and distinctly peculiar political equations. In Bihar and Assam - Modi's BJP ought to return to power while in West Bengal, the saffron party and even the RSS want to unseat Mamata Banerjee.

Incumbent West Bengal CM and Trinamool chief is sarcastically called "aapa" (Urdu word for Didi). This is for her blatant Muslim appeasement politics and governance. There is already a parody against her 

"O Pishi tui chole ja... Bangladeshe choleja".





There were reports in West Bengal of terror elements ostensibly supported by Islamic State having drawn out plans to attack Indian temple priests.


Indian agencies have been warning since 2010 that Bangladesh-based groups like Ahle Hadith Andolon, Jamaat-ul-Mujahideen Bangladesh and Harkat-ul-Jihad-al-Islami (HUJI) are turning their neighborhood into a “seedbed and activity center” for their global activities. 


The interim regime in Dhaka has simply failed. It has failed in more ways than one. 

The Sheikh Hasina government might have had good intentions. But she paid a price for both factors - corruption under her, few political mistakes and for being close to the Modi-led dispensation in Delhi.


The overall security apparatus in Dhaka has been pathetically incompetent to grasp and control the situation. The attack on Durga puja pandals since 2021 was a pointer. 

No doubt; after the 2016 Dhaka siege, the then PM Sheikh Hasina had raised the question, 

“Yeh kemon Musalman?”, meaning "What kind of Muslim kills innocents during the holy month of Ramadan?"


However, in Kolkata and in Delhi, a section of Indians might say the agony and ecstasy associated with the birth of Bangladesh in 1971 still hold the message that religion cannot bind a nation together for long. 


But more important question is -- what kinds of adverse fallout such a nation can leave on its neighbours !!





ends 


Friday, October 3, 2025

Social Media and Hindutva :::: Data could be used in umpteen ways to drill home the message that BJP or RSS wants to "enter the minds" of millions

Social networking has become a major tool to discuss communal issues in India or even in places like Nepal and Bangladesh.

As a result, it may not be simple fallacy that the Parliamentary Democracy and genuine Secularism are also under attack. 


But in social networking also; there are wheels within wheels. 


The 'Wall Street Journal' report in August 2020 cited quoted the case of one T. Raja Singh.

In a Facebook post, he reportedly said Rohingya Muslim refugees should be shot dead and Indian Muslims are traitors. He also threatened to demolish mosques. The posts violated Facebook's hate speech rules, but there was no action against Singh.





There was a BJP member of Telangana state's legislative assembly by that name. Did FB let it a pass ?


However, Singh claimed later that he has/had no Facebook account and that he cannot be responsible for an account operating in his name. His account was hacked in 2018 and he did not receive any response to the complaints he made about it.   

**

Misuse of AI on social media includes spreading disinformation via fake accounts and deepfakes, mass surveillance using facial recognition, conducting sophisticated social engineering and phishing attacks, and creating biased algorithms that can suppress legitimate speech or unfairly target groups. 


These abuses pose risks to privacy, security, and the overall integrity of online discourse. 


Disinformation & Manipulation


Cybercriminals use AI to create sophisticated bots that mimic human behavior on platforms like Spotify and Instagram, generating fake streams and activity to manipulate metrics or spread false content. 


 AI-generated "deepfake" audio and video can be used to create realistic but fake content, making it difficult to distinguish from truth. These are just mere symptoms of maladies. 


In 2020, 'The Wall Street Journal' claimed that a top executive of Facebook in India had told employees that "punishing violations by politicians" from Prime Minister Narendra Modi's party (BJP) would damage the company's "business prospects in the country."


As expected, the report sparked a major political row. 

Opposition parties said Modi's pro-Hindu Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has a nexus with the popular social media sites to push the ideology of Hindu nationhood among some 600 million users.


The BJP and its associated groups control Facebook and WhatsApp in India, according to opposition Congress leader Rahul Gandhi. 


"They spread fake news and hatred through it and use it to influence the electorate. Finally, the American media has come out with the truth about Facebook," he had said.

Rahul has lost credibility via-a-vis making allegations is another different chapter of defeat.





But technically, the challenges are increasing by the day. 

Loss of Human Touch: Over-reliance on AI in communication can make interactions feel impersonal, as AI lacks the empathy and nuanced understanding necessary for genuine relationship-building, says Ocoya. 


In some cases, human operators work with AI to enhance manipulation, with humans assisting AI-powered bots to overcome conversational limitations for more effective social engineering.  


Another disadvantage of AI in social media is its limited ability to be creative. 


AI algorithms are designed to analyze data patterns and make data-driven decisions. While this can be useful for tasks such as content curation and scheduling, it may not be able to generate truly unique and innovative ideas that can capture the attention of the audience. Creativity is often a key factor in successful social media campaigns, and relying solely on AI may result in a lack of originality. 


AI in social media relies heavily on data collection and analysis. 


This data includes not only the information shared voluntarily by users but also the data collected through tracking and monitoring. Privacy concerns arise when users are unaware of how their data is being used and are uncomfortable with the level of surveillance that AI enables. The potential for misuse or unauthorized access to personal data is a significant disadvantage of AI in social media.





As AI technology advances, there is a growing concern about job displacement. 


AI has the potential to automate many tasks that were previously done by humans, including social media management. While this may increase efficiency and reduce costs for businesses, it also means that certain job roles may become obsolete. 


This can lead to unemployment and economic inequality if not properly managed.





However, ordinary netizens say it is easy to argue that a social network platform like Facebook or Twitter should take action against those fomenting communal troubles. To keep an eye on what comes out in Indian social media is a gigantic task due to its scale.

Moreover, those who spread "hardline statements" and views also do so using different styles at times and use double-meaning phrases. 

Hindus have the advantage of numbers as the majority community in India. 

Obviously, hardline views against Muslims and Christians find more space in cyberspace.


The main concern among opposition political parties is that controlled or guided social networking platforms could have a gory impact on India's democracy and strong secular fabric.


Data could be used in umpteen ways to drill home the message that the ruling political dispensation wants to enter the minds of millions of people. Besides running campaigns based on fake news and half-baked truths, data can also be used to send selective messages and target opponents.


A few years back, the Communist Party of India (Marxist) has demanded a joint parliamentary committee probe into "this nexus between BJP and Facebook." Pending the probe, Facebook should be barred from operating with any government department or constitutional body like the Election Commission of India, said party general secretary Sitaram Yechury.


Investment interests


Facebook may not have any political ideology vis-a-vis Indian polls. But it plays the BJP's tunes because the party in power can protect its business interests in India.


Facebook and its three associated social media platforms have some 600 million users in India, more than what they have in the US. While Facebook has 200 million users, the WhatsApp chat service has 300 million and Instagram 100 million.


Facebook has also invested billions in India and plans to make future investments to advance the business in various states ruled by the BJP.





ends 

Mask of Diplomacy has slipped !! Bitter Truth is simple ... it may lead towards Time Bomb: Army chief Gen Dwivedi's warning to Pakistan "whether it wants to be on world map" is tactical and harsh


Army chief Gen Upendra Dwivedi has issued a strict and unprecedented warning to Pakistan. It has to be forthwith stop supporting terrorism or India's notorious western neighbour may lose out geographical presence on the map.


(At a press conference in Delhi; Air Chief Marshal A P Singh said that Pakistan lost as many as 12 to 13 aircraft, including fighter jets such as US-made F-16s and Chinese-origin JF-17s, to the Indian Air Force’s precision strikes on ground and in the air during the four-day Operation Sindoor.)


Speaking at an Army post in Rajasthan's Anupgarh, Gen Dwivedi said the Indian forces won't show any restraint next time.

Does it imply a second version of 'Operation Sindoor' need not be far away ?


"This time we will not maintain the restraint that we had in Operation Sindoor 1.0. This time we will do something that will make Pakistan think whether it wants to retain its place in geography or history....If Pakistan wants to retain its place in geography, then it must stop state-sponsored terrorism," he said.






This level of cautioning from the serving army chief and that too from a forward post in the western state of Rajasthan - and not far from Pakistan - shows things are being taken at the next level.  

The Modi Govt has said repeatedly that Operation Sindoor has remained inconclusive.

Thus, the remarks from Gen Dwivedi is a case of "telling the truth" about what makes India great as a country; and what also makes it different.


The timing coincides with senior Congress leader P Chidambaram, a former Home Minister, stating that in 2008 the Manmohan Singh government did not act against Pakistan at the instance of US and the pressure mounted from Washington.  






Notably, on the same day Air Force Chief, Air Chief Marshal A P Singh said that six aircraft - five fighters and a 'big bird', likely an AEW&C (airborne early warning and control) plane of Pakistan - were destroyed in mid-air strikes by India during Operation Sindoor in May.


The Air Force chief said the Indian military has evidence of at least one long-range strike on an AEW&C aircraft and four to five strikes on fighter jets during Operation Sindoor.


Precision strikes by Indian missiles also disabled radar systems, Command & Control centres, and runways, hangars and other military infrastructure, he said. 

A C-130-class plane - i.e., an American-made, military transport aircraft dubbed 'Hercules' - may have also been hit, he said.  


"As far as Pakistan's losses are concerned... we struck a large number of their airfields and a large number of installations. Because of these strikes, radars at four places, Command & Control centres at two places, and runways at two places were damaged. Then, three of their hangers, in three different air bases, were damaged..." he said at a press conference in Delhi.


"... one SAM (i.e., surface-to-air missile) system was destroyed. We have evidence of one long-range strike, which I talked about earlier, at more than 300 km... an AEW&C or other significant aircraft, and five fighters, (possibly) F-16 or JF-17... this is what our system tells us," he said.


In August the Air Force - in its first big statement since the Op Sindoor ceasefire - confirmed the extensive damage to Pakistani military assets. Besides the six planes hit mid-air, Indian missile strikes also hit Pak Air Force bases, specifically in Jacobabad and Bholari, the Air Force said.






An unspecified number of F-16s and at least one other AEW&C aircraft - all grounded because of operational reasons - were destroyed in those strikes, the Air Force had said. 


He maintained that some of the remarks of Pakistan PM Shehbaz Sharif were like fairy tales or "Manohor kahaniya". 





The chief of the air staff also said the IAF had the capability to accurately target new terror hubs coming up in Pakistan’s Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK) where groups such as Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM), Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) and Hizbul Mujahideen (HM) have begun relocating their bases after Indian forces bombed nine terror camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK) and killed at least 100 terrorists in the early hours of May 7 when Operation Sindoor was launched.


The IAF, he said, struck a large number of Pakistani airfields and installations.


“What we have gathered from intelligence reports is that on ground, because of these strikes, radars were destroyed in at least four places, command and control centres at two places, and runways damaged at two places. 


“As far as the air defence part is concerned, we have clear evidence of one long-range strike, a 300-km one, which happened to be either on an AEW&C aircraft or a signal intelligence aircraft…along with that (also hit were) five high-tech fighters between the F-16 and JF-17 class. 

This is what our system tells us.”


Three of their hangars in three different stations have been damaged. In that hangar, as well as on tarmac, we have signs of (hits on) one C-130 class of aircraft, one AEW&C (airborne early warning and control) class of aircraft...and at least four to five fighter aircraft, most likely F-16s, because that place happened to be where F-16s would have been under maintenance at that time,” 

-- Singh said, adding one surface-to-air missile system was also destroyed on ground.


ends 


ends 


"The Road is not empty .... Do not cross to the other side" --- A message to every Naga ..... From - The Naga Youth Movement ::::: 'Three decades of Catastrophe' -- Nagaland now needs to make way for Triumph either in 2026 or before 2028

  Has 'human evolution' run its course ? I do not have a ready answer.  Here I want to discuss, debate and argue over a short video-...