Kerala Gender Paradox: Highest Sex Ratio, Lowest Women MPs
Despite leading India in gender ratio, Kerala sends just one woman MP—Priyanka Gandhi Vadra—to the Lok Sabha; BJP cites missed opportunity under expansion plan
By NIRENDRA DEV
— Kerala presents a striking paradox in India’s gender narrative—while the state boasts the highest female-to-male ratio in the country, its political representation of women remains among the lowest.
Out of Kerala’s 20 sitting Members of Parliament in the Lok Sabha, only one—Priyanka Gandhi Vadra—is a woman. This comes despite the state recording a sex ratio of 1,084 females for every 1,000 males, the highest in India.
The contrast has gained fresh relevance amid debates over delimitation and the implementation of women’s reservation.
Political observers note that under a proposed expansion model often discussed in BJP circles—linked to a broader restructuring of parliamentary seats—Kerala’s representation could have increased to 30 MPs.
With one-third reservation for women, this would have translated into at least 10 women lawmakers from the state.
This forms a key argument within the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party’s outreach—positioning the women’s quota as both corrective and transformative. However, opposition leaders in Kerala see the issue differently, accusing the Centre of politicising gender justice.
Leaders of the Kerala Pradesh Congress Committee have termed the defeat of the 2026 Amendment Bill as a “victory for democracy,” alleging that the proposal sought to “weaponise gender justice” in the context of delimitation politics.
The debate is closely tied to the 106th Constitutional Amendment, which provides for 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies. However, its implementation is contingent upon the next Census and subsequent delimitation exercise—an aspect that has drawn criticism from several opposition parties.
Critics argue that linking women’s reservation to delimitation delays its rollout and introduces political uncertainty. Delimitation, which redraws constituency boundaries based on population, was last conducted in 2002 using 2001 Census data. Southern states, including Kerala and Tamil Nadu, fear that population-based seat redistribution could reduce their relative representation.
For instance, Tamil Nadu currently has 39 MPs. Under a proportional expansion model, this could rise to 59 seats in a larger House of 816, maintaining its relative share. BJP leaders argue that such a “pro rata” approach ensures no state loses out, even as total representation increases.
Beyond political contestation, the numbers highlight a broader national trend. Women’s representation in the Lok Sabha has improved over time—from just 24 MPs (4.91%) in the first House (1952) to a peak of 78 in 2019. However, the number dipped slightly to 74 in 2024, accounting for around 15% of the House.
Globally, India still lags behind. According to an Inter-Parliamentary Union study, countries like Sweden and Norway have around 46% women representation in national legislatures, while South Africa stands at 45% and France at 38%. Even Bangladesh has 21%, compared to India’s 15%.
The challenge is not just representation but participation. While the number of women contesting elections has increased—from 45 candidates in 1957 to over 600 in recent elections—their success rate has declined sharply, from 49% in 1957 to around 10% in recent years.
Demographic trends, however, show gradual improvement in gender balance. India’s sex ratio is projected to rise from 943 females per 1,000 males in 2011 to 952 by 2036. Women are expected to account for nearly 48.8% of the population by then.
Yet, as Kerala’s case illustrates, demographic strength does not automatically translate into political power. The intersection of electoral structures, party strategies, and legislative frameworks continues to shape outcomes.
As the debate over delimitation and women’s reservation intensifies, Kerala stands as both a model of gender progress—and a reminder of the distance yet to be covered in political representation.
No comments:
Post a Comment