Sunday, June 26, 2022

Jamir Slams Rio Regime, Says - A Small Minority Of Nagas want to retain ‘Status Quo’


New Delhi: 

As the Naga peace talks are moving towards a crucial stage by August, veteran Naga leader and former Chief Minister S.C. Jamir has charged the incumbent Neiphiu Rio regime with being “inefficient and corrupt”, while “extra constitutional elements” are, on the other hand, trying to establish their supremacy.


“We have a scenario where the constitutional government is inefficient and corrupt while the extra-constitutional elements are many whose sole objective is to establish their supremacy through inter-group conflicts and illegal extortions which has brought upon the people of the state unmitigated miseries,” he wrote in an article.





“A vast majority of the people are anxiously waiting for a new dawn but a small minority of the Nagas want to continue the status quo but people are now vehemently against it.

There is marked change in the mood of the people of Nagaland. The ideological watchdogs have failed to note that there is anger against anti-social and anti-national elements, and a passionate desire for a peaceful and progressive environment and for a practical solution to the vexed Naga problem.”


In his strongly-worded statement, the senior politician, who enjoys good rapport with Prime Minister Narendra Modi, went to say: “The Naga public is no longer novice to accept the dictates of the underground. Nagaland cannot remain captive to the social elements that strangled the progress of economic development of the state.”


Perhaps, in reference to certain demands of Naga underground elements, he also wrote: “Time has come to look forward to and participate in nation building without getting bogged down with impractical ideals, thereby wasting precious time.”


Jamir, who also served as Governor of states like Gujarat and Maharashtra, said: “Naga society has to be liberated from this demonic culture of corruption and multiple layers of authority, more particularly those who are unconstitutional. For this, sitting back in helplessness will not do. If Naga society is to be reformed and rejuvenated, the responsibility rests with the people alone.”


He strongly made a case for Nagaland to keep abreast with changing times.


“The people of Nagaland, especially the younger generation, want the truth to emerge. If we were to move forward to catch up with other advanced states of the country, we must reorient our mindset to be in tune with the contemporary realities.”


He also said that the future prospect of Nagaland would largely depend on how it responds to the “changing contemporary realities” and also the actions and inactions of leaders to face up to such realities.


“Let us not forget that in the initial years of our struggle, the leaders of the movement spoke in one voice. Sadly, today, the Naga people are still waiting for the emergence of a true, united and genuine leadership to lead them to a bright future. To compound matters, the elected government which should be responsive to the needs of the citizens and efficient in governance is anything but that,” the seasoned politician said.


Jamir, now 92, and who was signatory to the statehood agreement of 1960, has been advocating for an early solution.


Making a scathing attack on the state of affairs, he said: “Mushrooming of multiple authorities, both constitutional and extra-constitutional, in the state of Nagaland has totally destroyed all systems of governance. There is a clear breakdown of the rule in the state. The internal security situation is far more disturbed than the deceptive outside calm.”


The state is being held “hostage by armed underground groups, right before the helpless eyes of the state government”, he wrote, adding “Nagaland needs to be liberated from the clutches of this deadly monster”.




A peek into the future of Nagaland

June 26, 2022

What does the future portend for Nagaland? This question looms large as we approach the reality of a final political settlement that has eluded us for so long. The optimists amongst us envision a brave, robust, united and peaceful Nagaland embarking on the path of progress and seizing the opportunities that have been lost. Others may not be as sanguine. 

And they cannot be blamed given the bitter experiences of our past. This article makes an honest attempt to provide some answers that will better equip us to meet the challenges ahead of us.

Let me begin with the question: What is Nagaland? No one has better envisioned the true picture of Nagaland than Late T. Sakhrie, one of the shining lights among Naga Political leaders and I quote him: “Truly we are a peculiar people. We are all equals. Men and women have equal social status. We have no caste distinctions, no high or low class of people. There is no communal feeling, neither are there religious differences to disturb our harmony. There is no minority problem. We believe in that form of democratic government which permits the rule not of the majority but of the people as a whole. We govern ourselves by a government which does not govern at all. “We talk freely, love freely and often fight freely too. We have no inhibition of any kind. Wild! yes, but free. There is order in this chaos, law in this freedom. If I were to choose a country, it would be the NAGALAND, my fair NAGALAND –again and again.”

There is no doubt that nature has bestowed upon us matchless natural beauties. When we look around, we find beautiful rolling mountains and hills, glistening with the rays of the morning sun. Our lush green forests and valleys below provide sustenance to our people while our mountain streams, as they glide downwards, create a music that is divine. The generation before us-people like Late Sakhrie- were not only proud of our natural bounties and our rich traditions; they also wanted to see a vibrant, peaceful and united Nagaland moving forward with the times with progress and prosperity for everyone. A people-centric governance model with the village councils as its core and the benefits of development percolating down to every Naga living in the villages and towns was what our leaders who fought for recognition of a distinct Naga identity wanted. This is what the present generation of Nagas, predominantly our youth also want.

As against this, what picture of Nagaland do we see today? A polity convulsed by divisions created on tribal lines by self-seeking elements trying to block a permanent political solution for the Nagas. And a government unmindful of people’s aspirations but busy only with self-aggrandizement.

The elements mentioned above, underground in name only, have systematically and insidiously subverted the entire system of governance in the State to further their heinous and selfish designs. To make matters worse, the ruling establishment has totally abdicated its constitutional authority and made itself puppets in the hands outfits underground bosses. In such a scenario, violence and extortions continue unabated with the government machinery incapable of taking any action against those causing such mayhem.

In a democracy it is the government elected by the people which is the only constitutional and legitimate entity vested with the mandate of exercising lawful authority towards maintenance of law and order in the State. However, the painful reality today is that this authority has been usurped by unconstitutional elements who are, as a matter of fact, running a de facto government in Nagaland. Despite the presence of a plethora of non-governmental organizations and civil societies, the rot continues to fester.

The people of Nagaland have been aghast to witness the fragmentation of both the underground and over-ground organizations into multiple factions with divergent outlook and agenda, much to the peril of peace and unity in Nagaland. Perhaps, the most disturbing and alarming development in Nagaland has been the growing sense of indifference and benumbing frustration in the hearts and minds of not only leadership in the state, but also the bureaucracy, the intelligentsia, academia and even the common people in Nagaland. A pall of gloom and despair seems to have shrouded the entire physical and mental framework of people inexorably pushing them into a sense of utter helplessness. In this sordid scenario, what kind of a future can we expect for the Nagas? Is it not high time to take a serious note of the situation and make efforts to redeem the situation before it’s too late? Can we allow the proud legacy and glorious heritage of our civilization to wither away into nothingness? Can the valiant Naga tribesmen summon their legendary courage, gallantry and tenacity to rise to the occasion and salvage their land and society?

“There is no way to peace, peace is the way”. There can be no wiser dictum than this. Any society bogged down in conflict is destined to doom. The sooner we realize this the better for us. There are the two choices for the Nagas-peace or violence. As Christians, Nagas should truly uphold the tenets of Christianity which advocate peace, communal harmony and mutual co-existence. True religion propagates compassion, fellow feeling, selflessness and self-transformation. The question before us is how to get out of this combat mode? We may have to clear our minds of all cluster. Next, we should cultivate a positive attitude, so that we can face any kind of confrontation with composure and patience that is absolutely necessary to rein in whipped up passions. Only then can we generate solutions that are reasonable and peaceful.

Let us first build a Temple of Tolerance: In our struggle for a separate homeland too much of innocent blood had been shed. Many children have been orphans and many parents have lost their sons and daughters. Enough is enough! Let us now learn to live in peace.

The question before the Nagas is: Even if you refuse to confess that you belong to the same family, you cannot deny that all of you are immediate neighbours. Why then should we quarrel among ourselves. Many ugly things have happened during our political movement. If yesterday was a nightmare, let it go. Let today be a new beginning, a shared dream. Let us rise and build together, for we too have a temple to build, the temple of Nagaland where God delights to dwell as love. Let our theme be Forget and Forgive. Forgiveness means to make a new beginning, to start all over again with the person who caused you pain. “ Forgiveness is the fragrance of the violet released as the foot crashes it.” Let bygone be bygone.

Total overhauling of the systems of governance: Mushrooming of multiple authorities, both constitutional and extra-constitutional, in the state of Nagaland has totally destroyed all systems of governance. 

There is a clear breakdown of the rule in the state. The internal security situation is far more disturbed than the deceptive outside calm- it is being held hostage by armed underground groups, right before the helpless eyes of the state government. Nagaland needs to be liberated from the clutches of this deadly monster. 


The first and foremost task is to restore the broken fabric of governance at all levels. Let this task of reformation be entrusted to the most able and best qualified people in the administration to bring about drastic changes as rapidly as possible. In the current progressive- resistant society of Nagaland where there is a deficit of trust and nepotism is rampart, a merit-based governance needs to be established.“The I, the me, the mine is our great enemy. Through experience we have seen that our greatest enemy is the self which rises up at every turn and thwarts our desire for the common good.” Today Nagaland is plagued with corruption and the absence of rule of law. We should remember that the degree to which a society is respectful of the rule of law is linked to the rigor of its ethical code. The extent to which honesty, fair play and a sense of social responsibility are a reality determines the strength of a society. Corruption is like a cancer that eats into the vitals of a clean and effective system of governance, strangles economic development and has the potential of whipping up public anger and unrest. If Nagaland has to move forward and be competitive with other states of the country, Naga society has to be liberated from this demonic culture of corruption and multiple layers of authority, more particularly those who are unconstitutional. For this, sitting back in helplessness will not do. If Naga society is to be reformed and rejuvenated, the responsibility rests with the people alone.

Nagaland should keep abreast with changing times: The people of Nagaland, especially the younger generation, want the truth to emerge. If we were to move forward to catch up with other advanced States of the country, we must reorient our mindset to be in tune with the contemporary realities. The future prospect of Nagaland would largely depend on how it responds to the changing contemporary realities and also the actions and inactions of leaders to face up to such realities.

Paradox of Naga political movement: The hard realities staring us in the face are the hubbub of rival claims for leadership within the underground organizations. This not only weakens the sinews of the political movement towards a permanent solution but puts roadblocks on the attainment of peace and reconciliation in the society without which progress is not possible. Let us not forget that in the initial years of our struggle, the leaders of the movement spoke in one voice. Sadly, today, the Naga people are still waiting for the emergence of a true, united and genuine leadership to lead them to a bright future. To compound matters, the elected government which should be responsive to the needs of the citizens and efficient in governance is anything but that. Thus, we have a scenario where the constitutional government is inefficient and corrupt while the extra-constitutional elements are many whose sole objective is to establish their supremacy through inter-group conflicts and illegal extortions which has brought upon the people of the State unmitigated miseries. In such a situation, Nagaland can hardly progress and match with States in the region, not to speak of the country at large.

The bright light of enlightenment beackons Nagaland: We live in extraordinary times. Changes are more rapid and more radical now than ever before. Change is now a fact of life. These days, if we wait too long to recognize the importance of an innovation or if we postpone analyzing the ripple effects it may have on our society in general and on our lives in particular, the new thing may pass us by. Are the younger generation of the Nagas ready for this? If not, be careful. History may pass you by! We are now seeing before our eyes the most radical change in the field of science and technology especially information technology. What is going on in our land and society? Are we oddballs? Certainly not. Some amongst us, the so-called leaders, are too obsessed with the status quo. But the younger generation, especially the educated youth of Nagaland want to be part of the contemporary civilization. Their passionate desire is that they want to be players in this competitive world. If Nagaland has to progress sufficient space had to be created for them. At this stage mere tinkering with a broken system would be disastrous, rather our objective must be to reconstruct the entire system.

There is marked change in the mood of the people of Nagaland. The ideological watchdogs have failed to note that there is anger against anti-social and anti-national elements, and a passionate desire for a peaceful and progressive environment and for a practical solution to the vexed Naga problem. A vast majority of the people are anxiously waiting for a new dawn but a small minority of the Nagas want to continue the status quo but people are now vehemently against it. The Naga public is no longer novice to accept the dictates of the underground. Nagaland cannot remain captive to the social elements that strangled the progress of economic development of the State. Time has come to look forward to and participate in nation building without getting bogged down with impractical ideals, thereby wasting precious time. “The colour of the cat does not matter so long as it catches the mice.”- Deng Xiaoping.

It is the desire and prayer of every Naga that their land should be a role model for the country. With peace and stability, Nagaland can develop by leaps and bounds. It is inevitable that growth of wealth leads to more opportunities for individuals, especially the educated youth and this leads to a social transformation. The future of Nagaland is bright because an overwhelming majority of the people of Nagaland want it. The youth of the State want it. Collectively, we can make it happen.

Dr S.C. Jamir


Saturday, June 25, 2022

When US-China clash - Well, we have trouble in North East

New Delhi

Yashwant Sinha is in news these days for different reasons. Former Finance Minister of India, a retired IAS officer and who also headed External Affairs Ministry for a while is now contesting presidential polls as the opposition candidate. 

He moved from Janata Dal to SJP of Chandrashekhar to BJP and to Trinamool
and is now a presidential candidate. 

His son Jayant Sinha is a BJP lawmaker and may not vote for him.

The mercurial former Babu has roots in Hazaribagh region in Jharkhand (erstwhile united Bihar) and was instrumental in bringing Manmohan Singh closer to the throne and politics when 'overestimated economist and underestimated politician' was made economic advisor to then PM Chandrashekhar.




Nagaland Congress chief K Therie has endorsed Sinha's candidature with his FB posting "Yashwant Sinha is a good choice".

But here the context is not presidential polls or Sinha's chequered politics. 

As External Affairs Minister under Atal Bihari Vajpayee, Sinha had made a very crucial announcement on the floor of parliament on Dec 15, 2003 that, "We have been informed by the Royal Government of Bhutan that they have launched military action against Indian insurgent groups operating from camps in that country. 

Prime Minister (Vajpayee) has conveyed to His Majesty the King that the Government and people of India stand firmly and solidly behind the Royal Government of Bhutan at this critical juncture".


Of course ground work for this started when Jaswant Singh was the foreign minister. The big picture take away is once these operations were carried out several militant organisations, and especially, ULFA lost its spinal cord and so-called 'lifeline'. In later periods, things became uncomfortable for ULFA in Bangladesh too and even chairman Arabinda Rajkhowa came forward for peace talks.

 

This brings us to the issue of foreign countries' involvement in India's insurgency story.


Well, Bhutan was hardly a principal player. The support to ULFA and other groups came actually from Pakistan and China and to an extent from Bangladesh through radical Islamist forces.


Beijing's involvement is well known. Most militant groups in northeast India - if not all - have enjoyed Chinese hospitality.

The Chinese interest in the northeast started way back in 1954. In 1967, they supported an armed uprising by the Naxalites and around the same time, Naga militants had reached Yunnan and Er-Kung camps.

These encouraged 'radical communists influence' in eastern India and the country is still paying a huge price continuously.





However, the so-called 'American influence' through CIA especially in Assam is not highlighted or debated much.

Even in Nagaland context, the Indian agencies claimed in the sixties that the 'American Baptists' were backing one set of trouble makers and the Chinese were preparing to support their chosen groups.


The church in Nagaland have always denied such allegations but a latent 'clash' between Christian values and Communist ideology has remained.


About the American influence in Assam, Marxist doyen P Ramamurti had written in his booklet 'Real Face of the Assam Agitation' (1979) that - "The CIA for long has been active ...Its agents were directed to study social tension and how to use them for the purpose of destabilising the situation".


History is also a living witness that author of the famous book 'A Spy for all Seasons: My Life in the CIA' - Duane Claridge had dedicated a chapter on his stint in India.


The clash of communists with the church existed even in the 1970s at a broader level and not necessarily in Nagaland alone.


CPI-M leader Ramamurti had written that - "Christian missions have well known and close links with the Mizo National Front (than a hardcore insurgent group)" and have been providing funds "in the name of educational and philanthropic activities from the USA".


A keen observer of things that Ramamurti was known for also had wondered whether a popular US magazine was just making a mistake when it printed a map showing Assam outside India.


Some of these 'American involvement' were confirmed by Indian agencies later in certain details.  One Dr Lee Rose, an American national of Chinese origin, had reportedly floated the idea for a research project under University of California that 'Himalayan kingdoms of Nepal, Bhutan and Sikkim with Nepal as the nucleus could become a reality in conditions of extreme insurgency in northeast India'.


Obviously, such references were not purely or rather piously meant for academic studies.


ends   

 


Time to revisit why Islamists had 'preplanned' Godhra mayhem ?

Time to revisit why Islamists had 'preplanned' Godhra mayhem ?

Organiser

Link


New Delhi


Now that the Supreme Court has finally given a clean chit to Prime Minister Narendra Modi upholding the magisterial court's orders, it may be time to probe whether the Godhra train inferno was preplanned?


The BJP, the VHP and other Sangparivar elements have all along since 2002 alleged that the Godhrarailway platform mayhem of Feb 27, 2002, was 'preplanned'.One common refrain from Gujarat police and ministers from time to time - beginning 2002 - has beenthat "such a huge mob could not have been collected or gathered unless there was a deliberate attemptto incite violence".In fact the Railway Police Force FIR lodged on Feb 27 (2002) itself was the 'first' authentic version availableabout the incident. 


Photo credit: LiveLaw web



It had categorically said that provocative appeals made over loudspeakers from a nearby Masjid had surcharged the atmosphere.It also claimed - "miscreants from the minority community had planned to attack more coaches and thepassengers had closed all windows and doors and thus made themselves captive targets".

The RPF version maintained that the train was stopped for the 'second time' by removing the vacuum pump. Three RPF personnel on duty - Karan Singh, Sri Mohan Yadav and Ambaresh Kumar - fired four rounds from .303 rifles.Ambaresh also alerted other colleagues and the inspector in charge J K George.


Inspector George and one of his colleagues Nawab Singh rushed to the spot while 'provocativeappeals; were being made from the local Masjid over a loudspeaker.


The RPF FIR charged over 1000 people with conspiracy and murder under various sections includingsection 302 of IPC.The RPF officials also sought reinforcement and about 40 personnel and four doctors had rushed from Baroda.

Curiously, it was later given out by eyewitness accounts and local residents that Godhra township did not have much educated people. It was also reported that the chief occupation of a 'vast number of youths'in the township has been to rob train passengers, snatch chains and lift bags.

There were other interesting stories related to the incidents of Godhra railway platform.


One source had said then (in 2002) that there were heavy stone pelting on the burnt coach fromthe southern side of the tracks as window panes on the other (northern side) had melted in the fire.


Closer investigations of the Forensic Laboratory had stated that the intensity of the heat in the charredcoash S-6 was four-five times more towards seat No. 72.It was concluded that - "....standing in the passage of seat number 72, using a container with a wide opening,about 60 litres of liquid had been poured and immediately a fire had been started in the bogie".

On various allegations and theories of 'larger conspiracy', the Supreme Court has finally hit the nail. It said that accepting the argument of a larger conspiracy behind the riots would raise the question whether the Godhra train burning was also the “outcome of alleged larger criminal conspiracy”. 

“Such a view would be preposterous,” the judgment said. 
 
ends 

("Judgement clearly mentions Teesta Setalvad's name. Her NGO gave applications involving BJP workers to all Police Stations.There was so much pressure from the media that all applications were treated as truth" - HM Amit Shah.)





'Motivated campaigners'  now to face other side of Law: Teesta Setalvad, cop R B Sreekumar arrested 


The arrest came a day after the Supreme Court said that false allegations of ‘larger conspiracy’ were made in the Gujarat riots case. 


Former IPS officer RB Sreekumar has been arrested by the Ahmedabad Police. The move comes a day after the SC dismissed Zakia Jafri’s plea against former Gujarat CM Narendra Modi and other state officials, saying that false allegations of ‘larger conspiracy’ were made in the Gujarat riots case.


The arrests are linked to the verdict which said crystal clear - “As a matter of fact, all those involved in such abuse of process, need to be in the dock and proceeded with in accordance with law". 



RB Sreekumar has been arrested by the Ahmedabad crime branch for furnishing false information about the Gujarat riots. Gujarat Police has registered a case against former IPS officer Sanjiv Bhatt, former IPS officer RB Sreekumar and Teesta Setalvad in connection with the case.


BJP spokesman Sambit Patra said - “Setalvad tutored the witnesses”. He also said that the money collected in the name of helping victims were used for personal gain.





The Supreme Court had on Friday, dismissed as “devoid of merit” an appeal by Zakia Jafri in a plea challenging SIT’s clean chit to the then chief minister of Gujarat, Narendra Modi and others in cases related to the riots. Zakia Jafri is the widow of former Congress MP Ehsan Jafri who was killed in the riots.

Asked about his mention of NGOs, Home Minister Amit Shah told ANI : “I have read the judgment hurriedly but it clearly states the name of Teesta Setalvad. It was Setalvad’s NGO that gave an application involving BJP workers in every police station and the pressure by the media was so immense that every application was treated as truth.”

Supreme Court finally nails the 'lie' and theories of lies!


It said that accepting the argument of a larger conspiracy behind the riots would raise the question whether the Godhra train burning was also the “outcome of alleged larger criminal conspiracy”. 

“Such a view would be preposterous,” the judgment said. 


Arrested following SC verdict, Teesta earlier faced a funds embezzlement case


Teesta Setalvad had been into controversies in more ways than one about the 2002 Gujarat riots.

In 2004 November, an eye witness in the Best Bakery case of Vadodara, Zaheera Sheikh, charged her with pressurising her.

She is now amid yet another row as the Supreme Court has taken cognisance of the Gujarat police the complaint in the Zakia Jafri case, wherein Setalvad is charged with forgery, giving false evidence, conspiracy and fabricating records.

The complaint by the Gujarat police also names Retd IPS Officer R B Sreekumar and imprisoned former DIG (Gujarat) Sanjeev Bhatt. Sreekumar and Teesta have been arrested.

The Supreme Court has also said, “As a matter of fact, all those involved in such abuse of process, need to be in the dock and proceeded with in accordance with law”. So, the law has caught up with these elements.

In 2016, a three-member panel set up by the Ministry of HRD comprising Supreme Court lawyer Abhijeet Bhattacharjee, the then Gujrat Central University Vice-Chancellor SK Bari and a senior official from the HRD ministry had concluded in their report that Teesta Setalvad and her organisation had tried to ‘Mix religion with politics’ and attempted to spread religious disharmony through their ‘learning material’.

The reference and reading material was sanctioned by the then UPA government when Kapil Sibal was the HRD minister. The then UPA government had given a grant of Rs 1.4 crores to Setalvad’s trust, which she was accused of embezzling.

Teesta’s case is that of an opportunist individual who cleverly exploited the given situation, people’s nightmare and made the most from the muddled water. In 2003, she took an extraordinary interest in presenting Zaheera Sheikh at the Mumbai Press Club, wherein Zaheera demanded retail of the Best Bakery case of Vadodara outside Gujarat.

The entire legal case often appeared much murkier in the later stage. In 2004 yet again, a special court in Mumbai was informed by prosecutor Manjula Rao that Zaheera’s brother Nafitullah had given the slip and ran away from a guest house. So, he could not depose before the court.

There were also reports that Zaheera’s mother had asked for money from Teesta. An eyewitness, Raes Pathan, was appearing before a special court in Mumbai and said that he was deposed in the case because of Teesta.

On June 25, 2022, BJP spokesman Sambit Patra claimed Teesta Setalvad “tutored the witnesses”. He also said that the money collected in the name of helping victims was used for personal gain.

In fact, the funds abuse case against Teesta was registered on complaints of her former aide Raees Pathan. He had reportedly claimed that Teesta’s Sabrang Trust’s publications spread ‘dissatisfaction’ among minorities, especially Muslims.

The ‘curriculum’ they prepared under the Khoj project contained narratives of the Babri Masjid demolition and supposed saffronisation taking over the entire country.



June 25 - Emergency Anniversary Day : In 2017 Modi wrote ..... Not only is Democracy a system, but also a ‘sanskar’

PM Modi On Emergency 


"Not only is Democracy a system, but also a ‘sanskar’- a part of our ethos. Eternal Vigilance is the Price of Liberty. One needs to be constantly alert about our Democracy, that is why we must also keep remembering the events that inflicted harm upon our democracy; and at the same time move ahead, carrying forward the virtues of democracy. 






1975 – 25th June – it was a dark night that no devotee of democracy can ever forget. No Indian can ever forget. 


The country had virtually become a prison. The voice of the opposition had been smothered. Several prominent leaders including Jai Prakash Narayan had been jailed. The judicial system too could not escape the sinister shadows of the Emergency. The press was completely muffled. 

The present-day students of journalism and the champions of democracy have been endeavouring towards raising awareness about that dark period, by constant reminders, and should continue to do so. 





Atal Bihari Vajpayee ji was also in jail at that time. After one year of Emergency, Atal ji wrote a poem, in which he describes the state of mind during those turbulent times. 

The scorching summer month, 

The sad winter moonlight, 

The sobbing monsoon, 

An emptiness pervading within 

An entire year has gone by. 

The world confined behind bars, 

But the soul like a restless bird 

The freedom song resonates 

From the earth to the sky, 

An entire year has gone by.






My piece on Emergency and contemporary politics (2018)

Critics of politics often complain that it encourages and promotes the art of self-interest. But one irony of this situation is that political decisions often come back to haunt those who make them, meaning one mistake can become a legacy.


This is the dilemma the leaders of India's leading opposition party, the Congress, now face after accusing Prime Minister Narendra Modi of pursuing sectarian politics for the last four years, often crushing India's democratic principles. Modi, leader of the pro-Hindu Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), has forged an image as a decisive leader and tough taskmaster since he rose to power in May 2014.


In more ways than one, his government has been called authoritarian and criticized for discriminating against minorities.

But BJP leaders, in contrast, have taken to social networking sites, addressed press conferences and written blogs in the past month lambasting the alleged "dictatorial traits" of the Congress party, which (ironically) fought for India's freedom under the guidance of peace apostle Mahatma Gandhi.


The principal reason for the latest attacks date back over four decades. In 1975, Congress leader and Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, paternal grandmother of current party president Rahul Gandhi, imposed a 21-month "national emergency" on the country, suspending the fundamental rights of citizens and restricting the powers of parliament as well as the courts. 



Opposition leaders were put behind bars across the country.

The emergency, a period of sustained authoritarian rule, lasted from June 25, 1975, to March 21, 1977. 

The move authorized PM Gandhi to rule by decree, suspend elections and to curb civil liberties including press freedom.

In a recent blog on his Facebook account, Finance Minister Arun Jaitley recalled that the emergency was promulgated to curtail opposition protests seeking Gandhi's resignation as prime minister after the Allahabad High Court ruled against her in an election malpractice suit.

Jaitley refers to an episode whereby the Gandhi administration removed certain judges from the Supreme Court and appointed its own replacements to head the top court during this stormy period of undemocratic rule.


"The court was packed with the government's preferred judges. A dangerous thesis was propagated by Law Minister H.R. Gokhale that the judiciary must follow the social philosophy of the government and judges must be appointed on the basis of their social philosophy," Jaitley wrote.

He has also courted controversy by comparing Indira Gandhi with Hitler. Modi's regime has often been likened to the Nazi Party, with its last four leaders all falling subject to criticism. 

This was largely driven by their perceived anti-Muslim and anti-Christian bias, and their support for calls to ban the consumption of beef — cows are highly revered animals in Hinduism — and their refusal to crack down on vigilante squads and mobs who lynch people for engaging in the cow-slaughter trade.

Other BJP leaders have also slammed the Congress and questioned its "democratic credentials."

"On this day back in 1975, democracy was murdered by the Congress merely to meet its political agenda so it could continue in power," BJP chief Amit Shah tweeted on June 25, the anniversary of the emergency.

PM Modi, known for his anti-Congress rhetoric, has in the past attacked the emergency, describing it as a "black night that cannot be forgotten."

BJP spokesman Sudanshu Trivedi, meanwhile, has charged the Congress with pushing a "Nazi mindset" by bestowing on one leader and her family almost cult-like status.


"In 1934, Hitler's associates used the phrase 'Hitler is Germany and Germany is Hitler,' and the same spirit was rekindled by the Congress in 1976 when its president Dev Kant Barooah used the phrase 'India is Indira, Indira is India.' This reflect a Nazi mindset," he said.

Congress leaders responded by attacking the Modi regime for unleashing an "undeclared emergency" after the BJP came to power."No one in the [current] Congress party leadership supports the excesses of the emergency that were committed in the 1970s. But now under the BJP and Modi, we have an undeclared emergency as media freedom is being curtailed and the federal government is grossly misusing the anti-corruption agencies," Congress lawmaker Abhiskeh Singhvi told this blogger (2018).


Other Congress leaders concede that Indira Gandhi was known for her ruthlessness but they argue she had good intentions and held the country together in difficult times.

They refer specifically to the Indo-Pakistani War of 1971 and subsequent developments in Bangladesh when then prime minister Mujibar Rahaman was killed along with his family during a military coup in 1975.

"Indira Gandhi was a builder of modern India after India suffered defeat in the war with China in 1962. She was a builder of cultural institutions and she had a visionary mind," says a Congress leader. 

In retrospect, while looking back at Indira Gandhi over the years and especially in the context of the emergency, she displayed a firmness and fortitude that earned her many admirers, notably after she lost her second son, Sanjay Gandhi, in an air crash.

One of her supporters was Rajmohan Gandhi — a grandson of Mahatma Gandhi but not related to Indira Gandhi — a prominent author who once wrote that Indira Gandhi was not afraid to gamble and could stand unmoved in front of a hostile crowd.

"I think she was unmatched in holding the country together. But BJP leaders also sometimes forget that Indira Gandhi was defeated in the elections following the emergency," said Congress spokesman Randeep Surjewala, suggesting the public could not accept her authoritarian rule despite her earlier popularity.

His words were taken as a cautionary tale for the BJP, which could suffer a similar fate if it were seen as trampling on democratic principles.


Meanwhile, Indira Gandhi's emergency rule was immensely unpopular with Muslims as the regime imposed family planning.

In order to popularize a two-child-per-family trend, the administration coined the slogan "We two, our two" and imposed measures such as surgically sterilizing young husbands and wives in households that already had two or more children.

Sanjay Gandhi was at the forefront of this "crusade," a move Muslims publicly opposed as being against their faith.Other minority groups were also antagonized by Indira's rule. 

Legend has it she once declined to meet a Catholic leader on learning he only represented 2,000 voters.

In that sense, it can be said she was a "people's leader" — but only so long as these people voted for her. She was extremely populist and able to strike a balance with all sections of voters.

In Assam, her party's electoral policy in the 1970s was reportedly aimed at "winning over Alis (Muslims) and Coolis (tea garden workers)".

Regarding Muslims, she was so eager to win their widespread support she even pushed to promote Urdu among Muslims in Kerala and West Bengal — the two states where local Muslims prefer to use their mother tongues of Malayalam and Bengali respectively.

Urdu is the language traditionally used and favored by Muslims in South Asia.

By the 1970s and 1980s, she had even developed a rapport with the Communists, a faction of whom backed her emergency. 

Later, she would work well with long-surviving Marxist Chief Minister Jyoti Base of West Bengal.

During the emergency and in the years after, it came to light that she preferred a system and political loyalists who would take orders from her son Sanjay.

She was also very fond of the likes of Devkanta Barooah — who echoed certain Nazi sentiments and coined the phrase "Indira is India" — and she was willing to take orders from her trusted lieutenants like Yashpal Kapoor.



Blogger 





Friday, June 24, 2022

When Jamir said, "I made two mistakes";.... there was pin drop silence

New Delhi

As one ponders about issues and some pages from the unwritten past to be penned down for the next piece for 'Nagaland Page', one is overwhelmed by the thought that the write ups are well read these days.

For the piece on 'disqualified' Neiphiu Rio making it to the K L Chishi cabinet in 1990, I got a pat on the back on a whatsapp message inbox from none other the then Chief Minister himself.


grand old man: Jamir: Many stories



He must have pleasantly surprised to read the article of June 21 -'Luck matters, Rio's first entry into cabinet was as a disqualified legislator'.


Here is the link for those of you might need a ready reference.

(https://nagalandpage.com/luck-matters-rios-first-entry-into-cabinet-was-as-a-disqualified-legislator)


Chishi's message would massage anyone's ego: "Thank you Nirendra for the write up on my government in 1990. It was lucid reminiscent".


My editor Monalisa Changkija termed the compliment from Chishi as "great". What she meant was - carry on with your job more sincerely.


Nevertheless all these make one feel humble but more responsible. The phrase 'lucid reminiscent' could come from a master of words like Chishi only.

But thinking of democracy and what goes on in the assemblies and parliament, one had a stray thinking about what really goes on in the name of elections.

In simple sense, one could say - "The will of people manifests itself through regular and time-bound elections', courtesy 'The Statesman' festival special magazine of 2008.


But we also know Indian elections have many vices and saboteurs to destroy its real essence. The caste frenzy, the communal bomb, the gun culture and uses and abuses of money power.

S C Jamir as a veteran Naga politician has gone through different stages of politics. 

Around 1994-95, once he said on the floor of the assembly, "Mr Speaker Sir, in Naga politics, I think, I made only two mistakes...".
 

As he uttered these words everybody including those in the press gallery were
more than attentive. Maybe there was a breaking news on cards,
something sensational from one of the
most surviving politicians and also a signatory to the 16 Point Agreement.
But Jamir surprised everyone when he said something on a more grounded subject,
"One mistake was I made Vamuzo the Chief Minister and later in 1993, I
made K L Chishi the Finance Minister".
Needless to add, both were present in the House and both were furious.
On different occasions both the leaders reacted. Chishi said Jamir
thought everyone else
around him is a 'pawn'. Vamuzo was usual flamboyant - "You are a
habitual liar" - he told
Jamir straight.
Politics is never static. Ponder a little bit the other side for a few
years and things
change pretty fast. Nagaland state politics has undergone huge changes
over the years.
If the 1960s and 1970s offered one flavour, by the 1990s, politicians
started talking in different languages. By the 2013-2018 era, it has
changed all the more.


Luck is always a vital element in life, but it is more so in politics.


In 1995, as the Chief Minister, S C Jamir discovered a shy tourist officer

named P Wangyu Konyak. Had not NPC MLA from Tehok in Mon district T P

Manlem expired and

had Jamir not decided that the then pradesh Congress chief Chingwang Konyak

should not enter the assembly, Wangyu's political career would not

have started off.


He also became the Deputy Speaker and later made it to the Lok Sabha

as an NPF member of parliament. He did exercise his voting right in

the historic trial of strength in July

2008 when the Left parties withdrew support to the Manmohan Singh government.


One likes it or not, Jamir really had Midas touch approach and made bright

careers of a host of leaders spread in different parts of the state.

He had played 'Godfather' to the

likes of Kewekhape Therie and Neiba Ndang - who became first time MLA

in 1993 and straight walked to occupy the chair of Speaker.


Student politics and NSF grounding also created leaders. Shikiho Sema and R

Paphino (from Southern Angami region) were former NSF presidents. In

fact. Paphino's tenure as NSF chief was exciting as it had forced the

Vamuzo government to reduce the service age of state government

employees to 57 years of age or 33 years of service whichever is

earlier.


Interestingly during the tenure of V P Singh, the then Union Home

Minister Mufti Mohammed Syed (only Muslim Home Minister of India) had

called NSF a "parochial" body.


Predictably, the influential students' body was furious.

A former NSF president, Shikiho Sema was then Congress Lok Sabha MP

and veteran Vizol was

NPC member in Rajya Sabha.


Paphino had demanded unconditional apology from both and urged them to take up

the matter befittingly with the centre.


 As one thinks of these old anecdotes of Nagaland politics, let me

share a 'secret'. A few BJP leaders

and some MLAs (both NPF and NDPP) confessed that they did not know the

'disqualified' status of Chief Minister Rio in 1990.


What different that would make to their politics remains a puzzle.

As a stray thought, some friends are now suggesting me to pen a small

Quiz Book on Naga politics

where questions could be based on these anecdotes !


The idea looks promising, but meantime, promise me to read 'Nagaland

Page' regularly.


Wrap up:


The book is a 'book' and even a so-called Quiz book will be the one.

Book is also perhaps

at the last stages of its existence. New generation has not shown any

tendency to liking books.

But as an aging old school of journalism guy - one recalls a quote

from John Milton - "... who kills a man, kills a reasonable creature;

but he who destroys a good book, kills reason itself; kills the image

of God as it were".


ends


Thursday, June 23, 2022

Political instability has roots in first assembly itself

When Young Turks Vamuzo, Chishi, Imchalemna served in one ministry


New Delhi



Instability reigned supreme in Nagaland politics practically from the word go.


Name the Chief Minister under whom all Young Turks of their time -
Vamuzo, Shurhozelie, K L Chishi, Imchalemba, Dalle Namo served as ministers.

Yes, that was veteran J B Jasokie. 


The senior Angami leader was perhaps the only Chief Minister who complained
in the assembly that 7 MLAs and three of his ministers were 'detained' by unscrupulous elements and thus they could not come to the House.

The first Chief Minister P Shilu Ao was voted out on Aug 11, 1966 when the no confidence motion against the government was carried through. 


T N Angami was Speaker and he was later elected as Shilu Ao's successor.

The students of politics should note that in the general election to the second
Nagaland legislative assembly held in February 1969, only 40 members
were elected.

The Tuensang Regional Council selected 12 members to represent Tuensang
district. On Feb 16, 1969, a 16-member ministry headed by Hokishe Sema had assumed office.


K V Keditsu was the pro-tem Speaker and 51 members took oath on March 6, 1969.
Notably, K Shikhu, the Speaker of the first legislative assembly, was unanimously re-elected Speaker of the second Nagaland legislative assembly. 


In the subsequent period on March 10, 1969, K V Keditsu was elected Deputy Speaker, old records say.


In fact, during the stint of the second Nagaland assembly, no confidence motion against

Hokishe Sema ministry was taken up twice -- Nov 28, 1972 and later Sept 8, 1973.


Much to the credit of Hokishe's handling of politics - on both the occasions, the Chief

Minister survived as the two no-trust motions were rejected. 


The third assembly was witness to 'defections' and gross political instability. The first Vizol ministry took

over reins on Feb 24, 1974. K V Keditsu was elected Speaker of the House.


But owing to defections, the Vizol's UDF ministry stepped down on March 10, 1975 and an NNO ministry led by

J B Jasokie (reportedly an intimate friend of Hokishe) took charge the same day.

 

Rokonicha, a known name in regional politics, was elected Deputy Speaker on March 17, 1975.


But he resigned the next day. In fact, the period between March 18 and 20th (1975) saw a series of defection and shifting of political loyalties.


The Jasokie ministry was to seek a vote of confidence on March 20, 1975.


Records say before taking up the trial of strength, the Chief Minister instead raised a Point of Order

 and claimed three of his ministers and seven MLAs were "forcibly detained" by the opposition party.

The trust motion could not be taken up and on March 22, 1975, the House was put under suspended

animation.


In the ultimate, on May 20,1975, the assembly was dissolved. The fourth assembly was formed in 1977 and regionalist Vizol again took over the reins of administration on Nov 25, 1977. The Vizol ministry had 12 members and K Vitsonel was elected Speaker while Rainbow Ezung became the Deputy Speaker.


And then 'entered' the Jamir phase of Nagaland politics. S C Jamir, who was depuy CM, was dropped by Chief Minister Vizol on Oct 5, 1979.


The power politics shenanigans were back in action and the Vizol ministry was soon reduced to a minority. On April 18, 1980, Vizol quit.


Protagonist of nationalism, Hokishe with Rajiv 



The same day, the ULP ministry headed by Jamir took charge. Two of his compatriots were T A Ngullie and Dr Setu Legise.  

On April 21, 1980, Bendangtoshi was sworn in as a minister. The Jamir ministry was further expanded on April 28th and the new ministers were - H Sao Chang, M Kariba, L Mero, Toshi Hanso, Longyiem Konyak, K Shikhu and I Khehoto Sema (cabinet ministers).

T Imtimeren, Deblal mech, Horangshe and Ghutoshe Seme also joined the ministry as the Ministers of State.


But this was also short lived and Jamir also quit without facing the trial of strength. 


On June 5, 1980, a 15-member NNDP ministry headed by J B Jasokie again returned at the helm of affairs.

His ministry had Vamuzo as number 2 in the cabinet and there were several known players T Kikon, Shurhozelie, Noke, Sentichuba, K L Chishi, M Murry, Imchalemba, Dalle Namo and Dr Setu Legise.


Yopikyu was sworn in as MoS. In subsequent expansion, T P Manlem, Vejoy Vero and Chenlom Phom were also accommodated as Ministers of State.


The "Jamir's style of politics" was slowly making inroads in the corridors of power. On Sept 15, 1981, a No trust motion against the Jasokie ministry was moved. The motion plea was signed by Jamir and 22 others. 


But Jamir's detractors also knew how to strike back, and the motion was rejected on Sept 17, 1981.


The general elections to the fifth assembly was held in November 1982 and a ministry headed by Jamir

assumed charge on Nov 17, 1982.


There were several high drama in this House. The no confidence motion against Speaker Chongsen Chang

was brought on March 30, 1984, but it was later withdrawn by the members. Chongsen later joined the ministry.

E  T Ezung  became the Speaker.


On June 24, 1985, a motion of no confidence motion was moved by the Leader of the Opposition Vamuzo and 14 

others against the Jamir government. It was taken up the next day (June 25th) but it was rejected by the House.


Still, the stability remained illusive. On Oct 29, 1986, the Chief Minister Jamir resigned and Hokishe Sema, who was

then Rajya Sabha member, assumed office from Oct 29, 1986 ostensibly at the orders of Congress high

command.


This was the neo-modern stage of Nagaland politics as in Delhi, the Congress was headed by 

Rajiv Gandhi and despite popularity things started moving in favour of Janata parivar at

the national level.


Politics is a continuous process, and more so at the later stages.


ends 


Afghan territory not for threatening any country or shelter terrorists: BRICS declaration


New Delhi 


The BRICS declaration at Beijing on Thursday, June 23, reiterated the importance of combating terrorism in Afghanistan and categorically emphasised that the Afghan territory is "not to be used to threaten or attack any country or to shelter or train terrorists".



The Beijing Declaration of the virtual BRICS annual summit also said that the Afghan territory should not be used to plan and to finance terrorist acts.

"We call on the Afghanistan authorities to work towards combating drug-related crime to free Afghanistan from the scourge of drugs," it said.


The Declaration stated that, "We have discussed the situation in Ukraine and recall our national positions 

as expressed at the appropriate fora, namely the UNSC and UNGA. We support talks between Russia and 

Ukraine. We have also discussed our concerns over the humanitarian situation in and around Ukraine and expressed our support to efforts of the UN Secretary-General, UN Agencies and ICRC to provide humanitarian assistance".


Leaders of BRICS nations, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi, stressed the need for a comprehensive 

reform of the UN, including its Security Council, with a view to making it more representative, effective and 

efficient.


China and Russia reiterated the importance they attach to the "status and role of Brazil, India and South Africa" 

in international affairs and supported their aspirations to play a greater role in the UN.


Prime Minister Narendra Modi participated in the virtual summit along with Chinese President 

Xi Jinping, Russian President Vladimir Putin and top leaders of Brazil and South Africa. 


The summit this year was hosted by China as the Chair. 


Notably, the BRICS (Brazil-Russia-India-China-South Africa) brings together five of the largest 

developing countries of the world, representing 41 per cent of the global population, 

24 per cent of the global GDP and as high as 16 per cent of the global trade.



The BRICS countries also reaffirmed their commitment to ensuring the promotion and protection 

of democracy, human rights and fundamental freedoms to build a brighter shared future for the international community based on mutually beneficial cooperation.


"We reiterate our commitment to multilateralism through upholding international law, including the 

purposes and principles enshrined in the Charter of the United Nations as its indispensable cornerstone, 

and to the central role of the United Nations in an international system,"  said the Beijing Declaration 

of the virtual BRICS summit.


The Declaration also stressed the need to provide urgent humanitarian assistance to the Afghan people and to safeguard the fundamental rights of all Afghans, including women, children, and different ethnic groups.


"We reiterate the need to resolve the Iranian nuclear issue through peaceful and diplomatic means".


ends 


Reliance has the capability to refine heavy crude that’s produced in west including in Venezuela, - says Marco Rubio

Describing Reliance as a prominent energy company with a large investment in the US, Marco Rubio said: “This is a company…that has the capab...