Sunday, July 18, 2021

Sidhu and Congress revival – A Chronicle of failure under mother-son duo ::::: Facts and fiction? Survey by a US group claims Hindus ‘gain’ from conversion


Rahul Gandhi had resigned as Congress president following the party’s debacle in Lok Sabha elections on July 3, 2019. It is more than two years and the party is still being run by an interim president in the form of Sonia Gandhi – who has been ailing for quite some time now.

The ‘dynasty’ is refusing to give up powers and this is one of the unresolved predicaments for thousands of Congressmen and women. 

Prime Minister Narendra Modi had vowed a few years back to work for ‘Congress-mukt Bharat’. Congress is a ‘zero-MLA strong party’ now in important states such as West Bengal, Tripura, Nagaland, and also Delhi.

All in the dynasty !


In most other states it is readily playing second fiddle to regional outfits vis-a-vis the bigger battle against the BJP.

In Maharashtra, though sharing power, it comes third after Shiv Sena and NCP.

While Sena was an offshoot of pro-Hindutva movement, NCP was founded in 1999 when Sharad Pawar and others flagged off Sonia Gandhi's foreign origin issue.

What is the single biggest lesson the Congress party is refusing to learn in the last seven years since the UPA was voted out of power in 2014?

It is – one cannot change the course of history by turning the faces of portraits to the wall ! Rahul’s resignation was a well orchestrated drama.


The joke went – Rahul has resigned in his letter to Rahul and Rahul had consulted Rahul to finally decide that Rahul’s resignation should not be accepted and Rahul would continue to be the chief.

The reality is worse. 


Even within the family, there seems to be a lack of mutual confidence and thus even Priyanka Vadra was also not given the coveted office. Instead, before the 2019 elections, Priyanka was made general secretary in charge of eastern 

Uttar Pradesh. Her contribution was a few anti-Modi sound bytes to friendly television channels and website journos.


Some laudatory edits came in and spin masters seemed to have done their job. 


On ground, the Congress did not even put up a formidable candidate against Modi in Varanasi.


The UP voters virtually thrashed out Rahul from Amethi and in a rather helpless condition he is today a lawmaker 

from Kerala !

In between earlier this year, the Congress failed to capture power in Assam and also Kerala. 


In the southern state till now the trend was that every five years the government would be changed, but under Rahul even this could not be achieved.

Now match this with arrogance. The other day Rahul Gandhi released a video saying those who want to quit Congress could go ahead ! 


Such assertions do not suit a captain who has been losing matches.


Now in the run up to the Punjab polls, Rahul-Priyanka duo has reposed faith in Navjot Sidhu and snubbed the veteran Capt Amarinder Singh, otherwise a long time and unquestionable Sonia Gandhi loyalist.


This development also suggests perhaps the aging mother is being ignored – a story that happens to many families!


Is it okay only to blame Rahul Gandhi? 


Sonia Gandhi – an affectionate mother – with typical Indian Maa’s weakness for a son – is also to be blamed.


Her biggest folly was not allowing emergence of state leaders and younger generation leaders. Slowly she lost control in states such as Andhra Pradesh which was instrumental for the return of Congress to power in 2004 and also 2009.


Some years back, it was argued eloquently among Congress watchers that before reviving the party Sonia Gandhi 

ought to decide what role exactly her son would like to play. 


The enigma continues. 


The news from Rajasthan is never good.


Sonia Gandhi created history by 2014 itself when she became the longest serving chief of the organisation once 

held by her towering in-laws Jawaharlal Nehru and Indira Gandhi.


Rahul is running the show first as Congress vice president since January 2013 and later as the party supremo himself.


But all these years, the well known Congress vice – 'durbar culture' – has not been rectified.

The appointment of Sidhu re-establishes this.

This is a continuous trend of what was seen under Sonia also. S M Krishna was made External Affairs Minister and Shivraj Patil was made Home Minister.

Where was the meritocracy, a point now flagged off by Punjab lawmaker Manish Tewari?


In March this year, Rahul Gandhi had mocked Jyotidaditya Scindia calling him a ‘BJP back-bencher’.

Scindia, now the new Civil Aviation Minister, had responded well stating, “It would have been a different situation had Rahul Gandhi been concerned about me the same way as he is now when I was in the Congress”.

This perhaps sums up the Congress story of its repeated electoral failures!


Ends



A Melange of Facts and fiction? Survey by a US group claims Hindus ‘gain’ from conversion


New Delhi:

It’s a mix of facts and fiction. Some survey figures are difficult to stomach, some look doctored and some seem to be true though.


A latest research by American think tank, Pew Research Center, claims: “Hindus gain as many people as they lose” due to conversion.

If this was not enough, it also says “religious conversion is rare in India” and goes onto add – “This survey finds that religious switching has a minimal impact on the size of religious groups”.



It says, “Among Hindus, for instance, any conversion out of the group is matched by conversion into the group. O.7 per cent of respondents say there were raised Hindu but now identify as something else, and roughly the same share 0.8 per cent say they were not raised Hindu but now identify as Hindus”.

It of course says – for Christians, there are “net gains” from conversion as 0.4 per cent of survey respondents

are former Hindus and are now Christians while 0.1 per cent were raised Christian but have since left Christianity.

The study apparently ignores the menace of Love Jihad in the entire debate and also seeks to make light of ‘conversion’ into Christianity from amongst tribal and other vulnerable groups among Hindus.


At a time when there are debates about population control, ban on cow slaughter and beef eating and uniform civil code, the survey reveals that the “Dietary laws are central to Indians’ religious identity”.

The survey claims 72 per cent of Hindus stating that a person cannot be Hindu if he eats beef, and over three-quarters (77 per cent) of Muslim respondents say one cannot be Muslim if they eat pork.

It also says most Muslims favour (74 per cent) having access to their own religious courts. It is true Indian Muslims since 1937 have had the option of resolving their family and inheritance disputes in officially recognised Islamic courts known as ‘Dar-ul-qaza’.


The research claims 43 per cent of Hindus say partition of the motherland in 1947 was beneficial for

Hindu-Muslim relation and only 37 say it has harmed.

This is also a questionable claim.

Only three out of 10 among Muslims (that is 30 per cent) say Partition was good for Hindu-Muslim relationship and 48 per cent of them say the partition was a bad thing.

These figures certainly must be taken with a pinch of salt.

Caste has been showed as a pervading factor amongst all Indians. A whopping 70 per cent of them say ‘most or all of their close friends share their caste’. This may be entirely imaginative and a rather ivory tower table top data fudging.

It, however, says caste divisions persist even among Christians perhaps making a mockery of the religion of Jesus Christ.


Survey says 36 per cent of Christian men and 37 per cent of Christian women say it “very important to stop” people of their community from marrying into another caste.


The survey on Indian Christians says, most of them believe in karma (54%), which is not rooted in the Christian religion. And many Indian Christians also believe in reincarnation (29%) and that the Ganges River has the power to purify (32%), both of which are core teachings in Hinduism.


It is also somewhat common for Indian Christians to observe customs tied to other religions, like celebrating Diwali (31%) or wearing a forehead marking called a bindi (22%), most often worn by Hindu, Buddhist and Jain women.


Among Muslims, it says - 43 percent identify themselves as Other Backward Castes (OBC), 4 percent as Scheduled Castes (SC) and 3 percent as Scheduled Tribes (ST).
A higher number of Christians are still caste-bound, with 78 percent identifying themselves as SC, ST or OBC.



Ends  


No comments:

Post a Comment

A new Hindu Laboratory !! Impact of Hindu consolidation too extreme in Maharashtra ... BJP won more number of seats where Muslim population is over 20 percent of voters

The impact of the Hindu consolidation was such that the BJP won more number of seats where the Muslim population is over 20 per cent of the ...