Paradox is never a simple word.
As the first dome of Babri Masjid fell .... cronches blew and trumpets blared. 'Jai Shri Ram' was the slogan .... and the sadhus wielded their glittering tridents.
The Babri 'structure' or Masjid demolition on Dec 6, 1992 was in effect an explosion waiting to happen after Rajiv Gandhi-led Congress regime had given a mega sop to Hindu hardliners and ordered to open the gates and allow a makeshift temple on the controversial site. Of course the subsequent politics associated with it helped the cause of BJP's growth and as well as near acceptability of the Hindutva principles in Indian life.
Today's India is more than just Hindu mobilisation. It's often called 'Modi-fication' of Indian democracy. Narendra Modi is not just the Prime Minister. He is a great ambassador of Indian civilisational history - and that is certainly banking on the foundation of Hindutva values and ideologies.
On November 9, 2019, it appeared December 6th never happened.
The Indian judiciary made history. The Supreme Court of India ordered that the disputed holy site of Ayodhya in the communally sensitive state of Uttar Pradesh should be given to Hindus.
For historical reasons and otherwise; Muslims are generally taken as ‘historical entity and group of outsiders, traders and invaders’. The claims of the Muslim side on the site at Ayodhya were rejected and they were ‘dispossessed’ of the 16th century Babri Mosque.
The Supreme Court also ordered that Muslims should be given five acres of land at Ayodhya itself but away from the disputed site.
History, according to Victor Hugo, is partly an ‘echo’ of the past in the future. History is related to time and nothing flies in this mortal world and perhaps immortal universe faster than the time.
But talking about Dec 6, 1992 - one cannot blame only one party and spare the other. If we take BJP and Sangh parivar as one unit --- this section callously had forgotten for a few weeks or days that they acquire legitimacy through ballot box and not by mobocracy. On the other hand; let's take Congress, the communists and other anti-BJP parties and even the so-called Left liberal intellectuals. Their Secular bus never followed the rule of the roads.
The Narasimha Rao government had failed to protect the structure as it never had the courage and conviction to enforce the law of the land. The Leftists pursued their Muslim appeasement card because the polity suited them in West Bengal and Kerala. The intellectuals did not mind encouraging Muslims fight a losing battle even after archaeology studies had stated that a Ram existed on the spot.
The so-called pro-Left historians did the worst. Likes of Romilla Thappar lacked specific expertise in the medieval period, during which the Babri Masjid was constructed, yet still provided "expert opinions and testimonies in legal and public fora".
![]() |
| Uma Bharti and L K Advani - Dec 6, 1992 |
The Journey:
In 1989-90, when Ayodhya’s land dispute had emerged as a major issue, I was in my days of baptism into journalism far off in the wilds of Nagaland. It was the era of post-Shilanyas politics (thanks to Rajiv era), the Congress party had opened up a Pandora’s Box. The Hindutva mascot L K Advani had launched the Rath Yatra and ultimately BJP withdrew support to the VP Singh-led country’s first multi-party government.
‘Ayodhya’ wrote a chapter in itself in September 2010 when the Allahabad High Court pronounced its verdict. In circa 2019, the world had changed yet again – in more ways than one. The Hindutva assertion was a reality especially with the duo of Narendra Modi and Amit Shah at the helm of affairs.
But the seed of that assertion was kicked off by the Temple Movement and its protagonists – L K Advani and Ashok Singhal. Even Atal Bihari Vajpayee – given out as a moderate face and poet-politician, came under attack later.
Vajpayee, according to a video accessed by the media revealed, that on December 5, 1992 he had said that – “Rokne ka to sawal hi nahin hai (There is no question of stopping us). Tomorrow we will not be violating any court order if we perform kar seva)”






Babri demolition was a spontaneous incident as centuries of pent up anger poured out. But I must say what happened in 1992 was necessary, the way it happened was necessary, otherwise the fight for Ram mandir wouldn't have been won ever.no court was competent enough to order demolition of the standing structure and let Ram mandir to be construed in that space. Since the land was empty after Babri structure was demolished, Ram mandir could be realized. The kar sevaks may not have given so much deep thought when they assembled on that fateful day, but they knew if ram mandir had to be made that land was to be cleared ofvthe structure which occupied the space for centuries. The way case dragged on in supreme court to allow building of of Ram mandir on the empty land, one shudders to imagine what would have happened if Babri structure was still there and ram mandir was to be built by removing it. There would have been catastrophe across the country. So I feel like the old saying goes . Whatever happens is for the good. -- Krishna Kant, Pune
ReplyDelete