West Bengal political violence and overwhelming
instances of politisation of the entire police machinaries in the state is
slowly drifting towards a war which no one
probably wanted and – no one can win it in the ultimate.
The Mamata regime is again under fire. This time for
helping a Trinamool leader Mohammad Sohrab’s son “escape” – after he was
allegedly involved in a hit and run case that left an Air Force personnel dead.
The BJP took the battle to the President as also on January 16, 2016, actress
Rupa Ganguly – women wing chief of BJP Bengal – led party protestors in a
street-side demonstration in front of Lal Bazar.
Police deny there’s any cover up
efforts. “We are not concerned about how many people were inside the car. Right
now, our main target is to nab all the three accused (Ambia Sohrab, Sambia
Sohrab and Sonu). We’ll only be able to throw more light in the case once we
have them in our custody,” a police officer said.
Rupa Ganguly of Draupadi fame in TV serial acidly also made a
veiled attack on the Left parties on the site of protest when she said CPI(M)
was “number 1” – to be blamed for the deteriorating law and order situations
and “police inactions” in Bengal. “Trinamool Congress is something much bigger
and even above that number one,” she said.
I have maintained at times in these blogs and
elsewhere that the illustrious Bertrand Russel is out of fashion these days.
Some decades back he had put it quite graciously: “Indian democracy was
intended to serve as an example of the possibility of economic emancipation
without the sacrifice of democratic forms”.
Well, West Bengal is a test case of utter FAILURE of
this definition!
In 2011, Mamata Banerjee ousted the Leftists ending
their 34-year-old monopoly on Bengal politics but with often harmful and yet contagious
and menacing influence on Bengali mind. So much was Bengal pushed to an
ideological bankruptcy that it did not mind embracing someone called Mamata
Banerjee – a product of Congress backyards – as the alternative and perhaps
their savior. Nothing changed on ground. Nothing could have changed. It has
turned worse, according to many.
I know of Trinamool Congress law-makers, who
say privately, “I will win no doubt…that’s my good luck. But that is also the
ill-luck of Bengal”. “…..eitai Bangla-r dur bhagya,” he had said
precisely and did not lament – I suppose.
Let us come back to blankness of Bengali mind
however punctuating with my confession on own onetime favorite liner during
younger days in St Anthony’s High School – “ami monei praney communist (I am
communist by heart)”.
Since World War II – that is 1940s- the world had
understood that Marxism as an analytical guide to politics is OBSOLETE. But
thanks to propaganda machines and ‘frog-in-the-pond’ and ‘know-all’ virtues of
Bengalis and not forgetting equally amiable Mallus – Marxism survived and
thrived in parts of India.
Thankfully it got carried over to my in-law’s land:
Tripura too! And I assure you there are lot many ‘smart frogs’ in that world.
Sadly, the political culture of the Congress and the socialists – Janata parivar
– in national spectrum moved into Leftist trappings. Harkishan Singh Surjeets
could decide India is ‘safe’ under H D Deve Gowda.
Therefore the moral of the story is Triumph over
Communism in 2011 while was Mamata’s ‘Her-story’, it did not mean a paradigm
shift of Bengal politics and administration. Like all greatness about Bengalis,
Bengal and Maxism under that illustrious Bhadralok Jyoti Basu – who easily
threw up adjectives like ‘barbarous’ on BJP – Trinamool dispensation under Didi
also bequeathed a series of conflicts for the people.
The indifference to ‘religious doctrines’ evaporated
the faith and fear of value system and the lack of it. This opened room for goondaism
in gully politics, Puja pandals and in rural Bengal.
It also heralded appeasement
of a community calling themselves ‘minority’ and yet their struggle towards a
better life never found emancipation in the administrative rule book of Jyotism
and later under Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee.
There was innate parochialism . This
meant only Bengalis could criticise Bengal. L K Advani as India’s Home Minister
could not nor could Khushwant Singh – if he happened to make some remarks on
Rabindranath Tagore’s skills on writing fictions.
When the plot changed after 2011 – the scenario
suited Mamata Banerjee. She displayed Bengali culture when she sold paintings
for huge amount, she displayed courtesy of ‘Sonar Bangla’ when she said her
police force could tie Narendra Modi in a rope on his waist. She threw names
like ‘Haridas Pal’ on politicians of other hues. Bengal was rising?
With the death of Lenin, his followers almost gave
up the slogan: ‘the workers have no fatherland’. Mamata redefined that with her
ideology and in the context of motherland India. Thus she finds logic when
natives of Malda can have “conflicts” with Border Security Force.
From Burdwan district to Malda, border areas became hyper sensitive.
Have not we
heard such statements from insurgency-hit northeastern states and Jammu and
Kashmir? So what was really happening around Malda? Fake currency, opium
cultivation. Is Mother Saradha above having her share of smiles?
TMC leader's son Ambia Sohrab (Facebook) |
I compliment
Kerala for not discovering their version of Didi. Mamata Banerjee has
contemporaries in Kerala politics like soft-spoken K V Thomas. Both came to Lok
Sabha first in 1984 – 8th Lok Sabha.
Prof Thomas, a committed Congress politician, often shares jokes with us on the
intellectual demise of Marxism. But he says rightly, this does not entail the
end of communism. Sadly even if it does – Bengal has produced its illustrious
Didi – who will ensure that ‘the communist directive for political action’ as
was enunciated by famous Jyoti Basu will continue to orient the political
passion of the masses.
RSVP --- Répondez s'il vous plait - Reply If you Please.
nice post,
ReplyDeleteDownload hike apk
tks for yr feedback
ReplyDelete