In a season when Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi are basking in media glory for having cornered
the Modi government in Parliament, the Congress party seemed to have lost its
plot and instead chose to play with ‘fire’ in the north east. Sonia Gandhi made her Tarun Gogoi, almost on his last stint faced with a tough elections next year, retract his initial
“welcome” statement on the Naga peace move by the Centre.
Sonia Gandhi and her party should remember that Shillong Accord of 1975 was signed during the reign of Indira Gandhi. The much controversial clause of
the Shillong Accord read “the representatives of underground organizations
conveyed their decision of their own volition to accept, without condition, the
Constitution of India”. This pact was later responsible for so many violence and killings in Nagaland and other parts of northeast.
“The Prime Minister,
as well as Muivah must clarify whether NSCN(I-M) has given up its demand for
Nagalim. Why is the Government of India keeping such an important document a
secret. We demand that all contents of the agreement be made public,” said Assam Chief Minister Gogoi at a media briefing in New Delhi on August 7, a day after Sonia blasted Modi-Muivah peace pact.
In fact, along with
Gogoi, the AICC had summoned two other northeastern Chief Ministers – Nabam
Tuki (Arunachal Pradesh) and Ibobi Singh (Manipur) to toe the Sonia line that
Prime Minister Modi had displayed sheer ‘arrogance’ by ignoring her hand-picked
Chief Ministers.
“If a single inch of
our land in Manipur is taken as a consequence of this government, we cannot
accept it and we will fight if a single inch of territory is given,” said Ibobi
Singh, who had in 2010 sabotaged Muivah’s visit to his native Somdal village in
Nagaland.
Arunachal Pradesh
Chief Minister Nabam Tuki said that Modi had called up Chief Ministers of other
States but forgot to call them. “Such fast decision-making will bring troubles
and stress relations between the Centre and the States”.
As leader of Congress
party, which has ruled Nagaland and other northeastern states for long period,
Sonia had an opportunity to show that when it comes to 'national (India's)
interests', she can rise above party lines.
But a section of
netizens do not have much high opinion of Congress and its leaders on this
front. The BJP as expected
joined issue with her and union Minister Nirmala Sitharaman wondered, how the
Congress chief is questioning the accord after three days when the party
leaders including Ninong Ering and Assam Chief Minister Tarun Gogoi had
welcomed it soon after the announcement.
"Whose interest
is the Congress serving?', asked Sitharaman adding, "We probably never saw
an Opposition speaking against the interests of the country".
"Sagacity has
never been the forte of Congress and its leadership. In fact, they are the most
elitist, feudal and arrogant bunch of politicians, who think that ruling the
country is their birth-right. I am fully convinced that they are still hurting
from the fact that they are not in power," wrote Prashant Pandey on
the internet responding to this writer's blog.
Another Arun Shah, who also worked in Nagaland, wrote on Facebook emphatically, "north east leaders welcomed the
initiative of Government of India to resolve the longstanding Naga issue. However, after getting
tutored by Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi, they have retracted from their
initial stand of welcoming the Naga Peace Accord. What type of morality
these Regional Congress Leaders have?
Someone from Jaipur was all the more angry saying, "Sonia is always
misguided on major national issues. Opposition for the sake of opposition will
not get them popularity and back to power. In fact she and her bandwagon will be
alienated further. Majority will never endorse congress way of working as an
opposition party.
For my part, I ought to say Sonia’s attack that
Congress Chief Ministers were not consulted, I agree, has been on expected line but
uncalled for. It was time to show restrains.
Had she not taken a big political risk as the Congress could be now seen as a party opposing the hard earned peace process itself ?
At one go, Sonia has
conveniently forgotten that immediately after the signing ceremony, the Prime
Minister Narendra Modi had spoken to a galaxy of leaders including Sonia and
former Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh among others.
So, is it not burning
the bridge? How would she react when Prime Minister Narendra Modi would not
talk to anyone next time on issues of such importance?
When PM Modi called
Sonia, did she ask him, "what about my Chief Ministers....you need to talk
to them".
Worse, such grand
standing by a major political force in the northeast -- that Modi has shown
arrogance by moving ahead with the peace process, could only spark off some
adverse reactions.The hills in Nagaland
and parts of Manipur and Assam and Arunachal Pradesh, where Nagas live, have
been in flames in the past and as late as 2001 and even much later in 2010 –
when Muivah wanted to visit his Somdal village in Ukhrul district of Manipur.
For long, the refrain
in north east among the political class and even others have been that New
Delhi has been shedding crocodile tears. Ironically, the charge this time would
be against an opposition party and the Congress president Sonia Gandhi.
To sum up, ‘tight rope
walking’ responsibility would not be the sole liability of the Modi government and
NSCN(IM) alone.
And those who cite
Shillong Accord that failed to bring about peace and resolve Naga problem
should keep it in mind that the Accord was signed during the period of national
emergency under most powerful Indian Prime Minister - Indira Gandhi.
The Shillong Accord
was signed on November 11, 1975 and the Governor L P Singh, handpicked by the then Prime Minister, merrily posed for a
group photograph.
In retrospect, L P Singh's most favourite piece of draft was later dismissed by Nagas as an 'act of Treason'.
ends
No comments:
Post a Comment