Does 'groomed' Rahul have "appetite" for the cut and thrust of desi politics ::::: Another tryst with destiny would mean either defeat of Moditva or 'further isolation' of Dynasty ::::: Post Nov 1 rally, Can Rahul Gandhi present an "reinvented image" of himself and Congress party ::: The real reasons behind Narendra Modi's victory

Tried, tested and Rejected

Nov 1 - 2026 rally shows Mirror to Congress 

Can they get the message ?

Rahul Gandhi is always a tutored and groomed leader.

He was made Congress vice president with a lot of soap-opera drama. 

Lot of tear flow. Sonia Gandhi played an ambitious mother like any Indian mother but gave the colour of a philosopher-mom and told him "power is poison".

This was the session where Sushilkumar Shinde as Home Minister spoke in details about saffron terror. Rahul was 43. 

At 47, he has been groomed - as always - to lead Congress since birth and faced no challengers for the post of party president occupied for the past 19 years by his mother, Sonia.  But Sonia has the credit of bringing the party to power in 2004 and also in 2009. 

Once upon a time, the man was derided by political critics as “pappu” – or naive child. Every time he spoke in Parliament; Speaker Somnath Chatterjee did not fail to record his appreciation. He even used to thank and credit Rahul for tabling House panel report. Every time, Rahul spoke in Lok Sabha -- all Congress members would attend religiously and also thump desks. 

In 2011, when Meira Kumar was Speaker -- he gave a 'rashtra ke naam sandesh' during Zero hour. Nevertheless; politically he faced significant hurdles to lead India, including an ailing Congress party.

While there were 'doubts' over his mettle and his opponent by September 2013 was Modi. Soon by May 2014; his opponent became -- India’s most formidable prime minister in decades and the Hindutva icon Narendra Modi.

The 2014 mandate was a humiliating rout for Congress. Yet he survived and instead in 2017, he was made party president. As a backgrounder, everyone believed that the Congress - founded in 1885 - had ushered India into independence in 1947 and has ruled the country for most of its history. There was no scope to doubt that.

Rahul was expected to work on a few key fronts -- present a "reinvented image" of Congress party - which had by then became pro-Muslim as A K Antony report said.

He also ought to present himself as a serious Neta. Rahul initially for a decade or so enjoyed cultivating the image of a reluctant politician. Now, he is ambitious. But he has not yet given up the habit of  travelling overseas ... from US to Vietnam -- periodically.

 

Has he able to get the 'credibility' back for the Congress party? 

There would not be any objective analysis even by the media. Most stalwarts among analysts and observers are 'fed up' of Narendra Modi. All old jugadu games and junkets are now a thing of the past. For most the issues are more than just Indian democracy or secularism !

Rahul has ensured two things. The Congress and 'credibility' have been linked to what is anti-Modi and what is anti-Hindu. In the process; Modi has survived and more often focused more on Hindutva issues than hardcore governance. 

The Hindu-nationalism and developments are now Modi's ever lasting and ever-paying master cards.

 

The Congress losing ground in many states and unable to show any revival in states such as Gujarat, UP and Bihar or West Bengal only show that Congress’s brand of politics -- now more often pro-ultra Left has been superseded by the Lotus party.

Does well 'groomed' Rahul Gandhi have "appetite" for the cut and thrust of desi politics ?

Perhaps the doubts persist. He spoke about Jalebi factory in Haryana and his quote on 'potato factory' is also famous.

Addressing the students at Narsee Monjee Institute of Management Studies in Mumbai, Rahul said, "One day you're going to run this country, run the institutions, you will be the Steve Jobs in the Microsofts and the leaders…the Facebooks of this country." 

Did he not know that Steve Jobs is not from Microsoft ?

Rahul Gandhi surprised many when he hugged a wrong person in a photo-op during his visit to a hospital at Una in Gujarat to meet the young Dalit men who were stripped and beaten. He hugged a woman, mistaking her for a relative of the victims.

Not long ago-- research conducted by the Pew Research Center, a US-based thinktank, showed 58% of Indians viewed Rahul Gandhi positively compared with 88% for Modi.

Rahul Gandhi once mixed up the two Hindi words 'balatkar and bhrastachar' (rape and corruption) while addressing a women's rally in Madhya Pradesh as he tried to refer to the increasing number of violence against women in the BJP-ruled state. 

On Women and Gujarat: "If someone has given milk to Gujarat, it's these women." (Spoken during a rally in Dehradun while pointing toward women in the crowd)

Left to him and his select team of advisors; Rahul believes in high-profile speeches at US universities and fierce attacks on Narendra Modi. He would often say things - which are not expected like "Indian economy is dead". 

Sample these --  "The fight is about whether he, as a Sikh, is going to be allowed to wear a turban in India; or whether, he, as a Sikh, is going to be allowed to wear a 'kada' in India; or he, as a Sikh, is going to be able to go to a gurdwara." (during a foreign visit).

**

"The RSS's idea is similar to the idea of Muslim Brotherhood in the Arab world."

His outbursts more often give opportunities to attack Rahul.

Once a BJP spokesperson said:

"He goes abroad, defames India, tells lies. He is not the Leader of Opposition but the Leader of Propaganda. He has said in Germany that there is no manufacturing in India, and institutions have been razed. China, he has said, is doing well. Praise China, defame India, this is Rahul Gandhi's identity now."

 

ends

Memory piece ::: Naga Peace Talks, ex-babus and roadblock ---- originally written in Oct 2021 :::: "I cannot vouch that New Delhi has kept all its promises made to Nagas"

Life is never a linear progression.

The appointment of Keviletuo Kiewhuo as 'go-between' for parleys has been allegedly linked to "financial arrangements rather than merit and national service", says the  Government of Naga National Council/Democratic Socialist Republic of Nagaland (GNNC/DSRN).

It also sought clarification from the concerned leadership. 

Can Mr Ajit Lal and Home Secretary Govind Mohan or the NPF be proud of these related matters ?  

The 'New India' as PM Narendra Modi keeps mentioning, can give a solemn assurance that it will not commit any breach of faith. 

Time to create a new set of 'gentleman's promises' and time to pledge to honour those. The Naga hills are crying for peace.

All eyes on Namo's 'next move'

To state that the Naga peace talks have hit a roadblock over the issue of Naga flag and a separate constitution is actually a half truth. 

If these twin issues today can derail the basic peace process that began in 1997, it may not be erroneous to suggest that the peace negotiations never took place all these years.  

The peace talks were kicked off during the tenure of I. K. Gujral as the Prime Minister. The United Front-II under Gujral, a suave former foreign minister himself, in the backdrop of UF-1 under H. D. Deve Gowda, was on a weak turf. 

A weak Prime Minister : Mishandled many things 

But the most precious episode of 'peace efforts' with ultras took place during this regime heralding much optimism among various stakeholders. Most important players were aware of the various complexities in Naga peace parleys as this was unlike the Mizo talks in the mid-1980s.  

The Vajpayee government, which soon succeeded the Gujral regime, appointed Swaraj Kaushal as the first peace interlocutor in 1998. Kaushal, husband of the late BJP leader Sushma Swaraj, had handled the Mizo talks and was also Mizoram Governor later. The NSCN(IM) had issues with Kaushal and initially, it said the peace interlocutor was trying to resolve the Naga issue using 'Mizoram prism'. Well, things became difficult for Swaraj Kaushal and despite Sushma being a blue-eyed girl of both Atal Bihari Vajpayee and L. K. Advani, Kaushal gave up the assignment.   

Since then, the Government of India under Vajpayee, Manmohan Singh and now Prime Minister Narendra Modi has banked on former central government officials. A retired IAS officer and former Union Home Secretary, K. Padmanabhaiah was the second negotiator.

He gave indulgence 

.... to the militant group and talks happened across the globe including a few well known South East Asian hubs. 

Padmanabhiah : Loved travelling overseas 

In 2000-01, the Vajpayee government had toyed with the idea of putting in former Lok Sabha Speaker, P. A. Sangma, as the peace negotiator. This was objected to by Sangma's fellow Congress colleague Tarun Gogoi, who said no active politician from the Northeast should be given such a role. 

Sangma was furious with both Vajpayee and Tarun Gogoi.  

P A Sangma 

Nothing much has happened in terms of details about the parleys since then. The then Nagaland Chief Minister S. C. Jamir knew well the machinations of his Naga brethren and hence he kept insisting with L. K. Advani and others that the 'agenda' of talks should be made public. 

The veteran Congressman had reportedly entrusted G. K. Pillai, then joint secretary in the Home ministry, to pass on the requisite question and information to L. K. Advani. 

But Jamir's voice was ignored perhaps deliberately; and also because Jamir was a trusted Congressman. He also never enjoyed any positive vibes with NSCN(IM) general secretary Thuingaleng Muivah.  

Had the agenda been 'made public' in the 1990s or even in the new millennium, we would not have had headlines screaming in October 2021 that the Naga peace talks have hit a roadblock due to twin issues of flag and constitution (Yehzabo). 

Even then, these twin issues were hanging fire but the babus (especially the retired club) did not brief the political leadership well and things went on. It was a virtual status quo in talks since 1997; and today it is circa 2021. Except for the issue of 'unity or bringing all contiguous Naga areas under one administrative umbrella' nothing much was perhaps discussed in a concrete manner.

Blogger at Kohima : On way to Post Office/old NSF Office  

After Padmanabhaiah, the Manmohan Singh government tried R. S. Pandey as the negotiator. 

A former state chief secretary and Nagaland being his state cadre, it was presumed that his approach would be different. On this front, sources say, Pandey often faced a handicap as then Prime Minister Manmohan Singh hesitated to give 'political clearance'. 

In between the Manmohan Singh-led UPA-2 lost popularity over corruption issues and slowly its credibility. 

Pandey resigned in the run-up to the 2014 general elections and suddenly appeared along with Sunil Shastri and another former babu, R. K. Singh one afternoon and joined the BJP. R. K. Singh, the IAS officer who arrested L. K. Advani in 1990.

R K Singh also became Union Power Minister.   

Under Modi, right from the beginning it was NSA Ajit Doval show vis-a-vis Naga talks. Rajnath Singh as Home Minister did not interfere much. 

R. N. Ravi, a friend of Doval, was made the new interlocutor. 

The NSCN (IM) never trusted Ravi but as the PMO put its foot down, talks went on. In between Doval and Ravi -- both from Intelligence background -- worked on other fronts and other Naga groups. 

The Naga National Political Group (NNPG), a conglomerate of seven Naga groups operating in Nagaland, came forward and said they were keen to ink a peace deal to ensure 'end of violence and arson' in Naga hills.

Ravi worked hard with the NSCN (IM) also and on August 3, 2015, he signed a Framework Agreement with none other than Muivah himself.  The maverick Muivah had no option as his chairman Isak Chishi Swu was hospitalised in a serious condition. Subsequently, Ravi worked with the NNPG and on Nov 17, 2017, another pact titled 'Agreed Position or Preamble' was signed between the NNPG and the Government of India. 

The NNPGs are ready to ink the peace pact. They made it clear that they understand Prime Minister Narendra Modi's stance vis-a-vis flag and a separate constitution.  

Another group led by Niki Sumi too has come forward showing keenness to embrace peace and development. In fact, in a recent statement after meeting with new interlocutor A. K. Mishra, it pledged to go by the "aspirations and wishes of the Naga people".  

But the latest salvo (2021) from the NSCN(IM) does not augur well for the peace process. "....the talks failed to live up to all the hype as the Government of India continues to indulge in political escapism" on the very issues that are holding up the road to the Naga solution, the NSCN (IM) has said in a statement on Oct 23, 2021.

The negativity could have serious implications.  

(I have been proved right. The NSCN-IM has split in 2026 with the creation of Eastern Flank and the talks now look derailed in more ways than anyone.) 

Firstly, the Government of India may have to take a call to go ahead with some agreements with other groups -- NNPG and the Niki Sumi-led faction. In such a situation, there could be negative and violent fallout in more ways than one. 

Moreover, the NSCN(IM) has a strong presence in Manipur as the Tankhul Naga tribe (of Muivah himself) has a sizable presence in key  pockets of Manipur. This Northeastern state goes to the polls along with Uttar Pradesh, Punjab and Goa in February-March. 

(Added in 2026 : Yet again, polls are due in Manipur in 2027 March and the entire state including Naga inhabited areas are in the midst of violence)  

The Meitei Manipuris, the majority population in Manipur, have been always cautious that in no way the state's boundary should be affected. Violence in Naga inhabited hilly regions in Manipur would again hamper smooth conduct of elections in the state.

The Sentinel clipping in 2021 

Future Tense:

Now, what is the future road map? Are we heading towards the doctrine of 'Promissory estoppel'? 

This term in jurisprudence means that the government of the day is 'stopped or can be prevented' from going back on its promises. Even the NSCN(IM) says that the Nagas do not have faith in the Government of India's promises. 

"The Nagas cannot be carried away by the 'post solution narrative' which is just a well laid trap," said NSCN(IM) a few years back.

As someone who has been covering governance under various dispensations, I cannot vouch that New Delhi has kept all its promises either to the Nagas or to the other sections of people. 

But under the given circumstances, allowing one or more Naga groups to go back to the jungle will not be advisable.  (Eastern Flank has established toehold in Myanmar)   

The Congress party has already said (in 2921) that, ---

 "The Naga peace talks have suffered a serious setback due to the ham-handed approach of the Modi government". 

Well, not many common Nagas will disagree with this allegation, but the same Naga people also know that the Congress party lost a golden opportunity between 2004 and 2014 when they were in power.

On the other hand, as a practical solution or a road map, one can suggest that the Modi Government should prepare a draft agreement for Nagaland and Naga people; and announce all its economic packages and other policy announcements. 

It can perhaps also express regret if not tender an apology for all 'past mistakes' and failing to keep 'old promises' made in the 1960 Statehood agreement to the Nagas.

* this piece was run by news agency IANS in Oct 2021 .. and the article was published in 'Morung Express', 'The Sentinel' (Guwahati) and also 'The Nagaland Post'. 

Added on Nov 1 (2026) :  

This is now a season of big ado about a letter from Home Secretary. The hype is about the role given to Shri Ajit Lal. Rio says: ".... the earlier interlocutor, AK Mishra, was a Northeast adviser and not a political interlocutor, and that his talks were limited to underground factions, which did not lead to a solution but resulted in further disarray.

Rio said the government of India had responded on September 11, 2026, stating that it had decided to continue the talks under a minister or group of ministers and had officially appointed Ajit Lal as the interlocutor for the Naga peace talks.

Either Nagaland CM, Neiphiu Rio, understands a lot or he remains innocent MLA (like those days as NIDC chairman in 1990).  

Is he suggesting a group of Ministers of State will be more powerful than Amit Shah ? Or he means -- Lal has more 'say' about pleasing some of his friends unlike R N Ravi. In the meantime, an Angami businessman is the 'go between' for peace parleys with NSCN-IM. The gentleman Keviletuo Kiewhuo is known as a close 'operative' of Rio. 

New Delhi is aware of this. 

Mr Kevi is also known as someone who has confidence of V S Atem.  

There is pressure for Solution. But 'my favourite chief minister' wants a role for himself and his party NPF (along with Mani Shankar Aiyars) once Solution comes. Should NNPGs prepare themselves for interesting times ? Nagas also understand this. 

No need to undermine A K Mishra's contributions to the cause of peace in Nagaland.  

As his old friend, we may remind Rio --- some words, phrases and language of a man is like the person's DNA.  One can get caught.

Truth of capital 'T' is dead long back ... nevertheless. 

ends 

If Nov 1 rally was to "re-launch" Rahul Gandhi ... Congress might have achieved a limited success to "restart" Rahul Gandhi's "political trajectory" :::: the journey taken to take on Modi is still "inadequate and ill-advised"

The narrative of "relaunching Rahul Gandhi" has been deployed by political opponents especially the BJP across multiple phases — dating back to various electoral campaigns, organizational revamps, and large-scale public outreach initiatives like the Bharat Jodo Yatra.   

The SIR issue and calls for Gyanesh Kumar’s resignation have galvanised support for 'beleaguered' opposition parties, who are seen to have flailed in the face of the BJP’s electoral power.  Rahul Gandhi has spent months accusing the BJP of fraudulently influencing elections, but his claims have been largely ignored. 

Hero of Zero Hour : 2011 ::: Launching at a wrong Time 

Critics certainly use the phrase to characterize every major political mobilization led by Rahul as a fresh attempt to fix or restart his political trajectory, but his sycophants and supporters claim these as Rahul's outreach to grassroots workers.  

In 2011, the then Leader of the Opposition Sushma Swaraj had criticised the manner Rahul Gandhi was allowed to make a 'public speech to the nation' (Rashtra-ke naam Sandesh) during zero hour on the Lokpal bill in Lok Sabha during the height of the agitation led by Anna Hazare. 

"Was Rahul Gandhi's speech a Zero Hour intervention or an address to the nation," Swaraj had asked in the House on August 27, 2011 much to the embarrassment of the then Speaker Meira Kumar. Paradoxically, she was brought back on Oct 31 for yet another round of "re-packaging" of Rahul Gandhi.

Relaunching - with backing of Mamata : 'aapa' lost her ground in West Bengal 

"Zero hour is meant to raise an issue. Why were norms relaxed for Rahul? Zero hour allows three minutes to raise an issue, Rahul took 15 minutes," Sushma Swaraj had said evoking protest from the Congress members but the Speaker Meira Kumar chose not to react.

Nov 1 rally was another such occasion. The Sickular media dutifully covered the episode trying to hype the event as far as possible. Look at the BBC coverage :  

"The crowds gathered at Ramlila Maidan, a sprawling ground in central Delhi known for hosting major political and cultural events. Some protesters sang and danced to patriotic Bollywood songs, while others waited beneath a large canopy in the colours of the Indian flag to hear opposition leaders speak. Gandhi and several senior opposition leaders arrived at the venue in an open jeep, travelling through crowds of cheering supporters."   

BJP spokesperson Jaiveer Shergill criticized the Ramlila Maidan event as “Rahul relaunch attempt 101” and an expensive public relations exercise, questioning Congress's narrative on vote fraud.

Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma and other BJP leaders similarly mocked the continuous efforts by the Congress party to repeatedly rebrand Rahul Gandhi. 

In 2023, 'The Economist' said:

"Walk through the Indian countryside alongside Rahul Gandhi for a while and it is possible to imagine you are witnessing the rebirth of a political movement. 

"Traversing the northern state of Himachal Pradesh one wintry day last week the leader of Congress, India’s main opposition party, was heralded in every town and village. 

Scores of people jostled for space behind windows and on rooftops, brandishing phones and occasionally tablets to record a glimpse of him. Sporting a white T-shirt and bushy beard, 

Mr Gandhi trudged inside a rectangular security cordon formed by police wearing tracksuits and carrying a yellow rope. 

Every few minutes the caravan stopped and security guards hustled bystanders inside the cordon for a photo-op and brief chat."  

Bharat Jodo Yatra 

Reality about Rahul Gandhi as a 'fighter' is different: 

In 2014 -- Rahul Gandhi, the heir to India's Nehru-Gandhi political dynasty, was mandated by the Congress led by Sonia Gandhi to lead the 'struggling Congress party's campaign' at the general elections. But he was not nominated for the post of prime minister. In 2009, Dr Manmohan Singh was the PM-candidate. 

Congress announcement was seen as a small attempt of political manoeuvering aimed at protecting the 44-year-old (2014) from being a scapegoat for his party's problems. In 2026, he is 56. In between Rahul has resigned as Congress president and has a rubber stamp party chief in Malikarjun Kharge.   

In 2014, Congress was trounced by Narendra Modi’s party and reduced to its worst ever showing of 44 seats. In 2019, it improved on that results but loss of Amethi by Rahul and the BJP’s penetration of the country’s east, north-east and south confirmed that the Congress "has been superseded" as India’s only national political force.

The losses - 2019 and 2014 - revived questions about whether Rahul Gandhi and his family should "relinquish" control of Congress to fresh faces. Exactly a century back in 1919, Rahul;s great-great-grandfather, Motilal Nehru, took the helm of the party that led India’s freedom movement.  

The 34th annual session of the Congress took place in Amritsar from December 27, 1919, to January 1, 1920. The session's grand procession was jointly led by INC President Motilal Nehru and Muslim League President Hakim Ajmal Khan.

In 2024, the Congress tally improved to 99 even as BJP's number dropped from 303 to 240. But Modi was able to form government with the support of two key allies - the TDP and JD-U.  

But the fact of the matter is Congress vote-share increased only by 1.7 percent. 

After BJP won 2026 election in West Bengal; the opposition parties realised the Lotus party's electoral machine is 'more powerful' than it was imagined. But the journey taken to take on Modi is still "inadequate and ill-advised". 

Lot of hard work is required along with sound strategies. Even on the issue of Vote Chori and SIR - the Congress is presenting confused and mixed face.  

AIMIM President Asaduddin Owaisi says, "There is a minister (Congress), Satish Jarkiholi, calling SIR good. Meanwhile, Priyank Kharge (AICC president's son) says the opposite... Congress is calling out SIR across the nation. In my constituency—Hyderabad—Congress members went to the Election Commission and demanded that voters' names be removed... You have one tune in Hyderabad, another in Bengaluru, and yet another in Delhi...".   

ends 

"Hum jaa-banjh hae," says BJP dismissing Opposing rally :::: Super flop rally: BJP mocks INDI- alliance bloc over turnout, questions Rahul Gandhi's 10 lakh claim

"Where were the 10 lakh people? Show us," BJP leader Sambit Patra said, accusing the Congress of using "trick photography" to create an impression of a much larger crowd.

Taking a swipe at Rahul Gandhi, the BJP leader said becoming a Prime Minister required hard work. He used the Hindi words paseena (sweat) and mehnat (hard work), saying the two were what the letters 'P' and 'M' in Prime Minister stood for.

The BJP hit back at Congress leader Rahul Gandhi over his allegations of vote theft, questioning his own election to the Lok Sabha. The party said that if the elections were illegal, Gandhi, too, would be an “illegal MP”.

BJP MP Sambit Patra says, 

"Infiltrators are the vote bank of Mamata Banerjee, Rahul Gandhi and their allies. Only Indian citizens can be voters in India. Infiltrators cannot be voters in India. 

Mamata Banerjee can call us cowards or Kafirs or use any name from the dictionary. It does not matter. 

We are brave, and we will do whatever it takes for the country. Infiltrators entering the country, becoming voters and ruling India while we sit silently will absolutely never happen."  

Addressing a press conference, BJP MP Sambit Patra said the party had been observing the rally since morning and listening to Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi's speech, but described the event as a "complete waste of time." 

The BJP spokesman cited footage of the venue to argue that large portions of the ground remained vacant despite the Congress projecting a turnout of 10 lakh.  

Rahul Gandhi asserted that Gyanesh Kumar would be removed from his post and jailed for "treason" over alleged vote theft. He also warned Modi and Shah that they would face legal action and should not assume they could escape accountability.

"After Gyanesh Kumar, we will stand against you. Don't forget that for the vote chori you have done, there will be legal action against you and Narendra Modi," Gandhi said. Referring to Shah's reported remark that Modi was not going anywhere, Gandhi said the Prime Minister could not escape accountability. "Narendra Modi cannot go anywhere; even if he wants to go, we will not let him," he said.   

Congress general secretary KC Venugopal defended the gathering, describing it as a massive show of public opposition to the BJP leadership.

"Today, the people of India have given a clear message to Narendra Modi and Amit Shah that their time is over. Their time to retain power by hook or by crook is over," Venugopal said. He accused the government of undermining democracy by misusing the office of the Chief Election Commissioner and said the rally reflected public anger against alleged electoral irregularities.  

Sambit Patra says, "Rahul Gandhi ji, this India does not belong to your Abbu Jaan. This India belongs to the people of India. Even a tea seller can become Prime Minister and an ordinary person can become Home Minister in this democracy. And that is what bothers you. 

Rahul Gandhi ji, you are neither Shiv nor is the chaos you want to plunge India into any 'Shiv Ji Ki Baraat'. This is not Shiv Ji's Baraat. This is nothing but a spectacle of chaos."

ends 

Assam begins eviction drive in Dhubri, nearly 90% of residents vacate ahead of action

 Assam begins eviction drive in Dhubri, nearly 90% of residents vacate ahead of action

The operation targets around 2,850 bighas of alleged encroached government land in Alamganj, while some affected families have approached the court, with the next hearing scheduled for November 13.

The Assam administration on Sunday launched an eviction drive in Alamganj Part-IX of Dhubri district, deploying a large police contingent and excavators to clear alleged encroachments on government land.

The operation began at 6 am, with the district administration dividing the area into sectors and assigning revenue officials to oversee the exercise. The drive targets approximately 2,850 bighas of land under the Gauripur Revenue Circle.

Nearly 90 per cent of residents had reportedly dismantled their houses and moved their belongings before the operation began. However, some families have not vacated the area after approaching the court seeking legal relief. The next hearing in the matter is scheduled for November 13.

Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma shared visuals from the eviction site on social media. The operation is part of the state government's wider campaign to reclaim government and forest land from alleged encroachments.  

The proposed drive had prompted anxiety among residents, some of whom said they had purchased plots from private individuals without knowing that the land belonged to the government. They also appealed to the administration to arrange alternative housing.

The administration has maintained that the land is government property and that the eviction is being carried out under the law. The court proceedings involving families who have sought relief are still pending.

"By orchestrating the massacre of thousands of Sikhs in 1984, the Congress secured 400 parliamentary seats", says Delhi Minister Manjinder Singh Sirsa

Delhi Minister Manjinder Singh Sirsa said on Sunday:

"The Gandhi family is responsible for the 1984 massacre of Sikhs. They have once again chosen the same date, November 1st, to execute a similar design. 

This is no coincidence; the Gandhi family is attempting an experiment, the very same experiment their father once carried out. By orchestrating the massacre of thousands of Sikhs in 1984, they secured 400 parliamentary seats. 

The same bloodline, the same modus operandi, and the same blueprint are being employed again... Today, we witnessed an attempt to sow chaos in the country. A minister from Jharkhand announced from a stage that he would bring 10,000 people to 'abduct' or 'carry away' the Chief (Election) Commissioner. Just imagine the mindset of the Gandhi family..."

Nov 1, 2026 -- A Day of Modi Detractors :::: But Spin Machines at work have limitations ::: Narendra Modi’s global stature matters :::::: Rahul-syndrome has caught opposition and Indian media

 

From a chaiwalla to a Hindutva pracharak to Gujarat chief minister who oversaw 2002 mayhem and to the post of India's Prime Minister; Narendra Modi has come a long way.  

Hardly any 'other democratically elected' or otherwise serving head of government is known to have received as many foreign state honours while in office. Prime Minister Namo has been conferred 30+ foreign state honours from nations spanning Asia, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, South America, the Caribbean, and the Pacific. 

The awards include honours from Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan, Maldives, the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Russia, the United States, 

-- Bhutan, Fiji, Papua New Guinea, Egypt, France, Greece, Nigeria, Dominica, Guyana, Kuwait, Barbados, Mauritius, Sri Lanka, Cyprus, Ghana, Trinidad and 

Tobago, Brazil, Namibia, Ethiopia, Oman, Israel, Slovakia, Seychelles and Palestine.   

It is true ... India's global stature has been on rise since 2014 or even prior to that (Manmohan Singh's Indo-US deal). It is also true therefore that attributing all that glories to one man could be misleading. India's growing influence is its 1.4 billion (140 crore) people - their talent pool and hard work and resilience.  There may be merits to argue that there have been a few 'extra ordinary' diplomatic achievements that could justify designating Modi as one of the greatest global statesman. 

But statesmanship on the global stage is never winning awards.  

But awards matter. Even former US President Barack Obama accepted the Nobel Peace Prize just months after entering office. 

Donald Trump showed his desperation for a recognition. 

Modi's credit lies in receiving a number of them from a diverse range of countries. In diplomacy, while he has not achieved the 'unachievable' -- the peace between Ukraine and Russia -- but both the countries have reposed some trust in Modi and India. 

There are other angles. During the COVID-19 pandemic, India supplied vaccines and medicines to nearly 100 countries, including Dominica, Barbados, Guyana, Papua New Guinea and many other small island and developing nations.

Admirers got a deeper message; Modi was not treating a large number of smaller and development-starved nation as mere geopolitical pawns.  

Instead, the Modi policy reflected a broader approach that treats small states as valued partners.  His detractors may say Modi hardly is able to operate at the level of Vladimir Putin, Donald Trump or Xi Jinping. 

However, none can dispute -- India's rise has been real. Opponents like Rahul Gandhi could be talking about a 'biased' election commission; but he and others even questioned India's economy calling it Dead. 

Of course no sensible Indian will also push a line that Modi is 'bigger' than India. 

At the same time, we know India has consistently been at the forefront of serving humanity. India even deployed a field hospital to Türkiye after the devastating earthquake in February 2023 under Operation Dost despite the two countries often having strained relations.

From evacuating stranded Indians and even foreign nationals during war and natural disasters to keeping sea lanes safe from pirates, India has shown doing something or the other.

Unlike the past, India has been active in conflict zones such as Yemen, or rushing humanitarian assistance after disasters—from Nepal to Venezuela. 

Prior to 2014 - politics was based on populism. The Modi government took a few uncomfortable decisions. And yet his popularity remained. Have we heard in the past about a common man's love for a Neta for his hard work and a faster sense of delivery with no major corruption charge ?  Largely, people are satisfied across India and in a vast country like ours - there is bound to be series of grievances too. There have been occasions - of failures and flip-flops. But there have been quick corrections too. 

His detractors would question him on technology and natural resources; but there are many (and even the same people) who will question him taking up some of these projects. 

At events like the Republic Summit, the Prime Minister has critiqued opposition parties (such as the Congress) for shifting the conversation—moving from questioning basic digital adoption to questioning high-tech advancements like AI and semiconductor plants, while overlooking broader national progress.  

Modi himself said: " There are people who ask,  --- where is India's rare-earth minerals market? Where is the supply chain?... These are the very people who used to engage in the "Data vs. Atta" debate, and today these same people ask, -- Tell us, Modi-ji, what work has been done regarding AI?" and you will find them asking, "Why are you building this data centre? Why are you setting up this semiconductor plant?"... 

It is crucial for the country to understand the true character of these people."   

Nov 1, 2026 protest is also a symptom of a troubling decline in politics.

A good opposition leader like Vajpayee or a George Fernandes would have debated in full, with substance in Parliament and outside. They might have made allegations but they would not have changed goal posts.

Time to be cautious with media ethics too. We have an increasing tendency to let ideology override everything else.

If you are to sound intellectual, you must attack Modi. This prism has made things difficult even for Neta class. A few years back, a veteran like Mukul Sangma was made to believe that Mamata is a rising star and he ruined his career in the process. 

The "articles" in propaganda express and elsewhere invite questions about the extent of editorial bias a publication is willing to indulge in. 

Why Modi is smiling? It's because Rahul-syndrome has caught opposition and Indian media. Whatever be their coloured vision or opinion of Namo; there is no adverse fallout or dent in Modi's  reputation.

What we have is the "credibility" of the Congress and other parties and a section of media - badly hit and eroded.

ends