Wednesday, August 5, 2020

History of Ram Mandir legal battle: And the D-Day, Aug 5, 2020

History of Ram Mandir legal battle



Here, take a check list on the history of the protracted legal battle, which has its genesis in the 16th century.

*1528: A mosque is built on the site by Mughal emperor Babar which Hindus say was done after demolishing a temple marking the birthplace of Lord Ram

*1853: First recorded incidents of communal violence at the disputed site

*1859: British officials erect a fence to separate the places of worship, allowing the inner court to be used by Muslims and the outer court by Hindus


* 1885: Nirmohi Akhara’s Mahant Raghubar Das, in a Suit No. 61/280 of 1885 filed in the Court of the Faizabad Sub Judge against the Secretary of State for India (then based in London), and prayed for permission to build a temple inside the mosque and a canopy on the Ram Chabootra.

* March 18, 1886: His petition was dismisses by a Sub-Judge, an Englishman. However, he had ruled, “It is most unfortunate that a Masjid should have been built on land specially held sacred by the Hindus. But as the event occurred 358 years ago, it is too late now to remedy the grievance.”

Many say the court admittance in that ruling on the presence of a temple earlier had actually ignited the hopes for the Hindus to reclaim the site.

*1949: Faizabad District Magistrate K K K Nayar reported to have got a wireless message on November 29, 1949 from the district police that some miscreants would on December 22/23, 1949, “force entry into the mosque and install a deity”. Idol of Lord Ram surfaces inside mosque. Muslims claim that it was kept there by Hindus. Both parties file civil suits. The government proclaims the premises a disputed area and locks the gates.

*Jan, 1950: The first title suit filed by Gopal Singh Visharad asking for the right to worship the idols installed at Sthan Janmabhoomi. The court restrained the removal of idols and allowed the worship to continue

*April, 1950: The state of UP appeals against the injunction order

*1950: Ramchandra Paramhans files another suit, but withdraws later.

*1959: Nirmohi Akhara enters the fray and files the third suit, seeks possession of the site, doing away with the court-appointed receiver. It claims itself to be the custodian of the spot at which Ram was supposedly born.

*Dec, 1961: UP Sunni Central Board of Waqfs moves in to claim possession of the mosque and adjoining land.

*1986: On a plea of Hari Shanker Dubey, a district judge directs Masjid gates to be unlocked to allow darshan; Muslim groups set up Babri Masjid Action Committee.

*1989: A fresh suit is filed by former VHP vice-president Deoki Nandan Agarwala in the name of Lord Ram for declaration of the title and possession in its favour at the Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court.

* 23 Oct, 1989: All the four suits, pending before a Faizabad court transferred to a special bench of the High Court. 

*Nov 9, 1989: VHP lays foundations of a Ram temple on land adjacent to the disputed mosque.

"If the Shilanyas marked the beginning of the fall of the Congress, then India’s leading political party, the Ram Mandir Bhumi Poojan ceremony signifies the emergence of the new politics brought in by the BJP," says 'Indian Express'

*1990: VHP volunteers partially damage the mosque. Prime Minister Chandra Shekhar tries to resolve the dispute through negotiations, which fails the next year

*6 Dec, 1992: The disputed mosque is demolished by Hindu hardline groups prompting nationwide communal riots which claimed more than 2,000 lives. On 16 December same year the Justice Liberhan Commission was set up to inquire into the demolition of disputed structure within six months

* January 7, 1993, the President promulgated the “Acquisition of Central Area at Ayodhya Ordinance” acquiring the site of the mosque – later enacted as an Act of Parliament and asked the Supreme Court for its advisory opinion on this question

*July, 1996: Allahabad High Court clubs all civil suits

*2002: The High Court directs the Archaeological Survey of India to excavate the site to determine if a temple lay underneath. In April, 2002  three High Court judges begin hearing

*2003: A 14-member ASI team begins a court-ordered survey to find out whether a temple to Lord Ram existed at the site. In August the survey says there is “evidence” of a temple beneath the mosque. Muslim groups dispute the findings

*2005: Suspected Islamic militants attack the disputed site. Security forces kill five people

* June, 2009: Liberhan commission investigating events leading up to the mosque demolition submits its report blames Sangh Parivar, BJP and leaders like L K Advani and Kalyan Singh for the destruction in a pre-planned manner

*July 2010: Lucknow bench of Allahabad High Court reserves its order on the suits, fixes 24 September for pronouncement of verdict




* 17 Sep, 2010: HC refuses to defer pronouncement of the verdict as pleaded by one of the parties ~ RC Tripathi ~ in the suit. Four days later Tripathi approaches Supreme Court against HC order. A bench refuses to take up the case. Matter referred to another bench
* 23 Sep, 2010: Stage set for imminent pronouncement of verdict. Supreme Court takes cognizance of SLP by Tripathi and fixes September 28 for next hearing.
 - People in Ayodhya-Faizabad express shock and anger on the delay.
* 28 Sept, 2010: Supreme Court dismisses Tripathi's plea for deferment of the verdict by the High Court.  

 * 30 Sept: Pronouncement of the judgment by the three-member bench of Allahabad High Court at Lucknow amid unprecedented security.


## Nov 9, 2019 - Supreme Court verdict in favour of Ram Mandir

Aug 5, 2020 --- Bhoomi Pujan for the Grand Ram Temple at Ayodhya

MEA snubs Imran's 'political absurdity' for releasing a new map of Pakistan

New Delhi: On the eve of the first anniversary of abrogation of the controversial Article 370 in the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan on Tuesday (Aug 4) sought to step up acrimony or bitterness with India by "unveiling a new political map" of his country.
 
Predictably, in a strongly worded statement, the Ministry of External Affairs said: "We have seen a so-called “political map” of Pakistan that has been released by Prime Minister Imran Khan. This is an exercise in political absurdity, laying untenable claims to territories in the Indian State of Gujarat and our Union Territories of Jammu & Kashmir and of Ladakh".

 
The MEA further said: "These ridiculous assertions have neither legal validity nor international credibility. In fact, this new effort only confirms reality of Pakistan’s obsession with territorial aggrandisement supported by cross-border terrorism".
 
A report in Pakistani newspaper 'Dawn' said: - "Addressing the nation alongside Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi, the premier (Imran) said that it would now be the "official map" after being approved by the federal cabinet, which had met earlier today, and would be the one used in schools and colleges". The map identifies Kashmir as a "disputed territory", according to the report.
 
Imran Khan also said the new map of Pakistan 'rejects' the steps taken by India on August 5 last year (2019) - in reference to abrogation of Article 370. The BJP under Prime Minister Narendra Modi 'fulfilled' one of their primary electoral promises on August 5, 2019 by way of abrogation of the Article 370 - which had given some 'extra' powers to the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir.
 


It may be mentioned here that Prime Minister Modi’s External Affairs Minister Dr S Jaishankar (in new dispensation since May 30, 2019) had said that when the controversial Article prevailed, Jammu and Kashmir was “in a mess".
 
“.....pre-August 5 (2019) Kashmir was in a mess. Difficulties in Kashmir did not start on August 5. It is supposed to be a way of dealing with those difficulties," the minister had said in September last year at the interactive session with Frank G. Wisner, a former US Ambassador to India. "We had the experience of 2016 when a self-advertised terrorist cult figure called Burhan Wani was killed and after that, there was a spike in violence. Our intention was to manage the situation (after the Article 370 decision) without the loss of life and restrictions were intended to do that," he has said.
 

The abrogation of Article 370, enacting Uniform Civil Code and a grand Ram Temple at Ayodhya were three principal yet contentious promises made by the BJP in electoral politics since its inception. Now, two of them have been implemented or about to be implemented. In terms of election promises – Art 370 has been abolished and the state of Jammu and Kashmir has been bifurcated. A union territory of Ladakh has been created and J&K also has been made a central government-administered UT.

 
Of course, even the Ram Temple is now a 'reality' as the Supreme Court gave a convincing and favourable verdict to that effect on Nov 9, 2019. Prime Minister Modi will be traveling to Ayodhya on Wednesday, Aug 5, to participate at the foundation stone laying ceremony of the new grand temple along with a galaxy of leaders including RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat. The Modi government also passed a law last year banning Triple Talaq - a system that did injustice to millions of Muslim women.
 
In fact, the government data shows that, after the enactment of new law, there has been drop in Triple Talaq cases by staggeringly high 82 per cent.



(Courtesy -- Organiser) 

Tuesday, August 4, 2020

Erasing a dark chapter, India performs Bhoomi Pujan for grand Ram Mandir

Ram Temple symbolises Ram Lalla's return 'home' --- the place where he was born !


In 1528 - came a structure called 'Masjid' --- sadly of course - it was destroyed on Dec 6, 1992 ! 


Erasing a dark chapter, India performs Bhoomi Pujan for grand Ram Mandir

Ayodhya:

Erasing a dark chapter of India's history vis-a-vis Sanatan polity, Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Wednesday performed the Bhoomi pujan' of a Supreme Court-mandated grand Ram temple in Ayodhya, the sacred and historic place where God Ram was born.

In 1528 a structure called Babri masjid was built by Mughal invaders and the same was grounded on Dec 6, 1992.
RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat and Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath, UP Governor Anandiben Patel were among those who attended the event.

A postage stamp of Rs 5 in five lakh numbers was released on the occasion.

The Ram Janmabhoomi movement got a fillip in 1990 with then BJP president L K Advani's Rath Yatra.

However, the aging Advani could not attend the grand occasion.

RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat said - "Hamey apne man ki Ayodhya ka sajana hae (We have to now cleanse the heart or 'ayodhya' of our inner self)"

He said the occasion of merry making certainly -- "anand ka shhaan hae".

RSS chief named L K Advani recalling his contribution in the
Temple movement and said, "he must be witnessing today's programme on television".

RSS chief also recalled the likes of Ashok Singhal.

Prime Minister Modi described the occasion as historic.
He also said the great occasion will have a global impact.

"India is today building up a golden historic chapter.....," Modi said.
"Aaj Pura Bharat Ram-Moy hae".

The guest list, including religious leaders who formed part of the movement that started in the 1980s, was restricted to 175 in view of the Corona crisis.

As a priest chanted Sanskrit shlokas' and the ground-breaking ceremony got under way under a giant marquee decorated in shades of reds and yellows, the Prime Minister and other dignitaries, all in masks, maintained social distancing and sat a safe distance away from each other.

Slogans of Bharat Mataki Jai' and Har Har Mahadev' went up as the ritual ended and the prime minister laid the foundation of the temple.

The priest kept on chanting Mantras and said it was a great occasion and also highly 'auspicious'.

"'Jai Siyaram'. This call is resonating not only in the city of Lord Ram but throughout the world today," Prime Minister said.

"I express gratitude to all citizens of this nation, Indian diaspora across the world and all the devotees of Lord Ram on today's pious occasion: PM Narendra Modi". See Less




Hindu civilisation does not allow this kind of destruction, but it happened. Finally, came the Nov 9, 2019 mandate of the Supreme Court allowing the construction of the Ram Temple fulfilling 500 years old aspiration of all Hindus - irrespective of caste, creed, linguistic or any other divisions.


At ground zero, Ayodhya - they say -- everything and everyone is 'Ram-moy' (Lost in Love for God Ram)

The 'achievement' marks a game-changer for India in more ways than one! 

Will India 'move away' from the model of 'appeasement of Muslims', showing disrespect to Hinduism?


Will the new model serve India - a country of 135 plus (estimated) population with substantial Muslims and Christians - better to ensure India's rise to 'continue' ? 


Perhaps, Muslims did not realise they were fighting a 'losing' battle !! And of course, the 'battered minority' community -which has a history of complicity in India's partition - were only misled by Left liberals and 'sickular' champions including the grand old Congress party. The best description of Congress intention vis-a-vis Ayodhya development lies in the words of M J Akbar, a senior journo-turned-BJP neta, who had said in 2010 --- "Congress policy on the dispute has rotated around one axis - how to get the temple built without losing the Muslim vote".


Now, it is worth analysing the 'new India' we are witnessing under Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Mind you, on Jan 12, 2003, at his first rally outside Gujarat - since 2002 December Gujarat assembly polls after the riots - Modi was specific - "do not be apologetic about Hindutva'.

So the 'new India' under Modi definitely has Development facet and also - a strong  pro-Hindutva element.

Of course, this brings to a good issue - how would it all span out at the global stage.

And here, it could be argued eloquently - India under Modi and wedded to 'Hindutva politics and assertive diplomacy', is all set to 'fascinate, excite and also to an extent agitate' the rest of the world.

Rashtrapati Bhawan


Priyanka Gandhi Vadra, Congress general secretary sprang a surprise 'favouring' building up of the Ram temple

Priyanka in her statement said, "On August 5, the programme of Bhumi Pujan is scheduled, this programme with blessings of Lord Ram and his teachings should become a symbol of national unity, brotherhood and cultural amalgamation."

“The Ramayana has a deep and indelible mark on the culture of the world and the Indian subcontinent,” she said in a statement in Hindi and signed it off with salutation 'Jai Sia Ram'. 

“Since ages, Lord Rama has been the thread connecting the people of India. “Sacrifice, courage and commitment are the essence of Lord Ram," said Priyanka.

In the past, Congress leaders even called Ram a 'kalpanik figure'. The party leaders felt apologetic about Shilanyas of 1986 and the then PM Manmohan Singh had said the first claim to country's resources ought to go to the 'minorities'.

BJP leader Rajiv Pratap Rudy has, however, welcomed Priyanka Gandhi's statement but dismissed efforts by Congress to take credit for the Ram temple saying the people knew very well what was the reality.

However, the Congress complicity in the entire episode came out to the fore on different occasions.


According to book, ‘Congress after Indira’ by Zoya Hasan: "Halfway through his five-year term as prime minister, Rajiv Gandhi had faltered in most of his major initiatives. ....One of the cardinal mistakes was to get directly involved in the controversy over the role of the state in regulating the personal law of religious minorities, and that at a time when Hindutva politics were on the rise".

After his blunder with regard Shah Bano case, Rajiv sought to win over Hindus and hence inched towards Shilanyas. 

The timing also turned out to be a 'blessing' for the BJP and other Sanghparivar forces who were left cornered and leaking wounds after 1984 elections - wherein the Congress had won over 400 seats in Lok Sabha polls.
Syed Shahbuddin & other Muslim leaders

In my book 'Ayodhya: Battle for Peace', I had quoted 'oldest Muslim litigant' - Hashim Ansari (who expired) - who had said:

"So much has been the Congress complicity in the case right from 1949 that UP's first Chief Minister Gobind Ballabh Pant dared to ignore Jawaharlal Nehru's directives to resolve the issue by removing the idol".

Ansari further said Pant had given "free hand" to K K Nair, then district magistrate of Faizabad, who had also 'refused' to remove the idol.

Ansari told me - he had advised Pant to resolve the issue. "But Pant was a religious person".

Irony is at later stage - Pant's son KC Pant had left Congress during Rajiv Gandhi's time and later joined BJP.

ends 

Monday, August 3, 2020

Ram temple will prove that God Ram was 'historical - born in flesh and blood'


# New Grand Temple with the mandate of the Supreme Court will snub the Christian, Left liberal and western 'propaganda' that India's two civilisational epics 'Ramayana' and 'Mahabharata' were mythologies


New Delhi/Ayodhya

One immediate impact of the Supreme Court ruling directing the construction of a Ram Temple
at Ayodhya and now the beginning of that process is the obvious argument that God Ram is 'not a myth'
and Ramayana - a mythology.

The term 'mythology' is definitely a western concept and smacks of Christian overtone.
The court verdicts - both the Allahabad High Court ruling in 2010 and the Supreme Court order of Nov 9, 2019, gives a legal stamp that God Ram is a 'historical character'.

In 2010 during my visit to Ayodhya during the historic verdict of the Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court, I had interacted with some local citizens. One of them Rakesh Sahni (quoted in my book 'Ayodhya: Battle for Peace') had said - "The verdict has proved that Rama was born in flesh and blood and he is not a mere Kalpana (myth). This is our biggest satisfaction".

Notably, the same historians never counter Bible as a Christian mythology.

In fact, a brief note in search engine Quora.com says  "....in a sense, the Bible is Christian mythology, but that does not deprive it of either its significance, or of the truthfulness of its message".

Another dedicated Hindu to the cause, Keshavram Mishra, chief Prabandhak of Sitaram Anna Shetra near Ram Lalla mandir premises, had said: "I am not sure of the legal matters, but it has reduced the stigma that Hindus had demolished a Masjid. Instead, the endorsement from a Muslim judge himself (2010) that Rama was born here has proved that Masjid if at all was constructed wrongly".  

There have been several political debates over the Temple movement in last three decades and more.



In his book, 'The Babri Masjid Ram Mandir Dilemma: An Acid Test for India's Constitution', Madhav Godbole had said:  

"Rajiv Gandhi remained focused on pleasing the fundamentalists among the Muslims and the Hindus; the Muslims by getting the Muslim Women's Divorce Act enacted, and later, the Hindus, by getting the locks of the 'temple in the mosque' in Ayodhya opened, permitting shilanyas (foundation stone-laying) of the new temple, and even starting the Congress party's Lok Sabha election campaign from Ayodhya to usher in Ram Rajya,"

Godbole, who quit as Union home secretary after the demolition of the 16th century disputed structure, called Rajiv Gandhi the "second most prominent kar sevak" after K K Nair, the IAS officer and former Faizabad district magistrate - who "encouraged" the placement of the Ram Lalla idol in the Babri Masjid on December 22, 1949.

Congress role vis-a-vis Ayodhya development has been 'political' right from the word go. The commitment for the temple
was hardly driven by sincerity and even faith.
In this context, it could be relevant to talk about a blog piece written by M J Akbar, who was then not in the BJP.

Akbar, senior journalist-turned-union minister (in Modi 1.0) had said rather acidly: "The game is old and evident. Congress policy on the dispute has rotated around one axis - how to get the temple built without losing the Muslim vote".

In fact, even Samajwadi leaders like Jay Shankar Pandey (a longtime lieutenant of Mulayam Singh Yadav) had told me in 2010: "It is no coincident that the verdict of the Allahabad High Court came (in favour of Hindus) when the Congress is in power in Delhi".

In 1989-90, the Rajiv Gandhi government played up Shilanyas politics to appease Hindus.
     ---- Post-Shilanyas, Congress leaders were keen to garner Hindu votes,
  Rajiv Gandhi even kick-started his party’s election campaign from Ayodhya-Faizabad on November 3, 1989. The location was selected at the last moment. Later Congress admitted that permitting the Shilanyas was a mistake !!
 
Some interesting takeaways:

**** Raj Kumar (RK) Singh, who had arrested LK Advani in Samastipur on Oct 23, 1990, is now Union Power Minister under Prime Minister Narendra Modi. 
Before joining the IAS, he served for a year as the Indian Police Service official.

## In 2003 ASI begins a court-ordered survey to find out if a Ram temple existed. The survey revealed 'evidence' of a temple but Muslims contested the finding.

1949 --- Ram idol 'appears' inside the mosque. Muslims file suit. Hindus file counter-suit, leading the government to declare the site "disputed" and lock its gate.

On Oct 30, 1990 ---- There was violence in Ayodhya. First two people identified at the 'top' of the Babri Masjid were from two Kothari brothers from Kolkata - Ram and Sharad.
They were allegedly killed by police at the order of the then UP CM Mulayam Singh Yadav. Their bodies were found on November 1, 1990 near the Hanuman Garhi temple, which is in the vicinity of the Ram Janmabhoomi temple site.

*** Two slogans became very popular during the peak of Ram Temple movement --- one - 
RAM MANDIR BANANA HAE and the other -- 'Ab ki baari ATAL BIHARI'. The second slogan made Vajpayee an automatic choice as a prime ministerial candidate of the BJP and also of non-Congress and non-Third Front politics.

Even regionalist from states like Nagaland - former Chief Minister Late Vamuzo - by 1996 endorsed Vajpayee as his 'choice' of India's Prime Minister. 

ends 

Feb 19/25, 2020 SOS to Mumbai DCP "Sushant's Life is at risk" !! But question remains, Did Mumbai police ignore such a forewarning ??


We are not going to sit quiet. We will question them (Mumbai Police) as to why such leads are hushed up,” Bihar DGP 



Sushant Singh Rajput's death --- just a crime out of greed of Rhea and her family ?


And what about the entire issue related to Nepotism menace ??

Why raising eyebrows on Mumbai police? Why a Bihar IPS officer put on 'quarantine' ??


Bihar Director General of Police (DGP) Gupteshwar Pandey has accused the Mumbai Police of not investigating the financial angle in the death of Sushant Singh Rajput. 


“In the past four years, around Rs 50 crore was credited to the bank account of Sushant Singh Rajput but surprisingly all of it was withdrawn. In one year, Rs 17 crore was credited to his account, out of which Rs 15 crore was withdrawn. Isn’t this a crucial point to be investigated?," the DGP has been quoted by a news agency! 


Earlier, the DGP had alleged that Vinay Tiwari, the Patna (Central) Superintendent of Police who has been sent from Bihar to lead the investigation, was ‘forcibly quarantined’ in Mumbai.

“Instead of sharing evidence or handing over the postmortem and forensic reports of Sushant, they (Mumbai) have almost house arrested our SP. I have not seen such non-cooperation by any other state police. 

Mumbai Police Commissioner Param Bir Singh said in a press conference that no money was directly transferred from Sushant’s bank account to his girlfriend Rhea Chakraborty’s account. 

Last month, Sushant’s father KK Singh filed an FIR against Rhea and her family, alleging abetment to suicide. 




In her sensational interview to Republic TV's Editor-in-Chief Arnab Goswami, Kangana Ranaut had called the probe as it was then a 'sham' as 4 key persons who should have been interrogated hadn't yet been called. Since then, Aditya Chopra & Rajeev Masand have had their statements recorded, while Mahesh Bhatt will now be called, and possibly also Karan Johar. 


Story changed after an FIR was filed at Patna and Bihar cops also landed in Mumbai.

Sushant's controversial partner Rhea Chakraborty and her family became major 'issue' in the entire debate.

Sushant Singh Rajput's father --- says "......kucch nahi kya" and this had compelled him to file a complaint with Patna police



Shiv Sena's Sanjay Raut - known for being close to Chief Minister and Sena chief Uddhav Thackeray - says: "I was watching a Raaj Kumar film and just recalled his famed dialogue that "those who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. I like Raaj Kumar. Nobody should point fingers," Raut said with a telling smile.


The reference blockbuster film "Waqt" (1965) - "Jinke apne ghar sheeshe ke ho, Wo doosron par patthar nahi fenka karte" (actor Raj Kumar)


Does Sena leader tries to implicate political rivals or 'Bihar police' and 'Bihar government' ????

A whatsapp message from a Haryana police official to a Mumbai DCP on Feb 19 and Feb 25 (2020) has made things further complex


The theme of the message (as reported widely in TV channels) -- Sushant's Life is at risk !!

But the question remains, Did Mumbai police ignore such a forewarning from a senior cop from Haryana.


Amid demand for CBI probe and allegation that Mumbai police is stalling probe by Bihar police says - the Enforcement Directorate has registered a money laundering case (under PMLA) involving the death of Sushant Singh Rajput and the role played by actress Rhea. Accordingly on Aug 3, 2020, a team of the investigative agency reached the residence of Chartered Accountant Sandeep Sridhar and quizzed him.

According to a top ED official, Sridhar, the long-time Chartered Accountant of Sushant Singh Rajput, is being questioned about the financial transactions of the late actor.


Time is ticking; and time to act against ‘Nepotism’ in Bollywood

My piece in a Port Blair newspaper


New Delhi:

Suicide could be perhaps defined as a love affair with ambitions and success that has turned sour if not bitter. But somewhere I have also read that suicide is man’s or a person's way of telling the God, you cannot fire me, I quit!


Bollywood actor Sushant Singh Rajput’s suicide made news and also, importantly, opened a can of worms. Now, who all are looking for cover?


Some 'dynasts and manipulators' who thought life and glorious history of Indian cinema should be as they decide. I saw a video wherein three dynasts –name kept withheld deliberately – shamelessly giggling and screaming at an award ceremony ‘Nepotism thrives’! This only shows their arrogance, their indifference and their damn-care approach. Foolishness can be often given out as bravado ! That’s actually the irony of life and foolishness.

But what piece I am trying to offer this time? Nope, it’s not on suicides. Nor on how India can turnout into a hub of mental agony and loneliness due to coronavirus-infected troubles.

Typically, have not we read and learned to understand a vital fact that everyone hates the evil being !
The negative characters! Suicide is certainly one such chapter.

In Bollywood, negative protagonists on the screen have sometimes been a club of gems. It used to be said in Mumbai (or previously Bambai) that Pran – who epitomised a near untouchable villain – was one of finest persons in the Bollywood industry. Of course, I did not know Pran intimately even from a professional point of view. Though Pran sahab died 12 July, 2013; by the time I landed in Mumbai to work for a premier news agency, the iconic star had almost vanished into oblivion.

But when ‘negativity thrives’ – look at the manner the 'sickular and pro-China lobby' sang the song over LAC debacle and also Covid19 gloom – I thought, it could be in fitness of things to remember just a few loveable Bollywood baddies - people whom we all could never ignore; even if we despise them for their on screen roles.

Long before the appreciation by spin-masters started about Shah Rukh Khan for his success in ‘Baazigar’, ‘Darr’ and ‘Anjaam’ (wherein the protagonist is even admired for kicking Madhuri Dixit); the negative roles were not quite taboo for several stars in the past too.
Likes of Jeevan and Ajit would be always cherished and so would be roles by Premnath.

People, in fact, have fond memories of Amjad Khan’s ‘Kitney aadmi they’ and ‘Bahut yaarana lagta hae’ one-liners.

Amitabh Bachchan actually thrived with near-negative characters portrayed by him in ‘Deewar’ and ‘Trishul’. But this was also the time – the ugly pattern started in the film world. And thus I say, despite my immense admiration for ‘Vijay’ especially in ‘Deewar’– the films of that era tried to promote one set of artistes and characters those otherwise deserved to be painted black.


In ‘Deewar’ (1975) there was a classic case of efforts to glorify the role of dockyard don Haji Mastan. Mastan operated a powerful smuggling syndicate along the Gujarat coast and through Mumbai and later 'diversified' into film financing and real estate business. This marked the entry of rotten and ill-gotten money intothe film world.In fact Amitabh's first major success 'Zanjeer' had Pran portraying Karim Lala, leader of the Pathan gang and he was presented as an evil-turned-good soul protagonist.

A relevant campaign in Mizoram

A deliberate attempt was also made that other than a select group of ‘writers’, none could give the type of stories and songs those came up.

It was the beginning of the lobby culture. Some of them rightly made use of their religion and also cultivated political class too! They also easily grew friendlier to the 'dynasty political family' in Delhi, a few political parties and also the Left Liberals.

But look at the turn of events – no one would perhaps remember Amjad Khan’s son today – who also made an attempt to make a niche for himself in the industry but failed.

For that matter ‘Sholay’ director Ramesh Sippy too could not produce or direct a film of that calibre and entertainment value. But look at some of those ‘dharma-putras’ and people much younger and with the right surname with ‘K’ in it.


Some people are born lucky or ‘forcefully’ given the luck and allowed to be raised as cult figures!
Remember the infamous hit and run case in Mumbai and chasing the blackbuck in Rajasthan!

There is also a biopic on Sanjay Dutt, and one is not aware of such a biopic coming on the life and works of stars and also colourful characters like Amitabh Bachchan or Rajesh Khanna. Yes, the lobby seems to work everywhere !

Now most of these ‘stars’ with all kinds of lucky surnames and etc etc are feeling the heat of people's anguish due to one reason or another. Several of their films have flopped and so to regain popularity, they often try to use the names of Hindu Gods and epics! But these are also not successful.


Opportunism is an art in politics and thus one Sena leader in his enthusiasm has dismissed the entire theory of nepotism in Bollywood altogether. Of course, he cannot be speaking against 'dynasty' for he already has a talented ‘future deputy CM’ in his party !

Talking about villains in Bollywood, one cannot forget Prem Chopra, and his one of the noted dialogues.

“Mein wo bala jo sheshey se patthar tod doon (I can even break a stone with a glass piece)”. 
All negativity is not just bad! One feels sorry that Sushant Singh Rajput chose to end his life so early. 


All our prayers are with him and condolences for his family, but it is true that his tragic end has sparked a fantastic debate on push and pull of manipulators and dynasts. The debate should get us to a logical end.

Can Sushant's death help us to get to the rot?

And yes, there is a need to rethink how so many Pakistani stars make so easily in Bollywood ! 

I need not hate Pakistani stars, but when it comes to manipulation and nepotism, one can get angry easily!

If today, there is a lot of talk about nepotism and many first generation ‘outsiders’ are screaming out against discriminations – we can easily say there is no smoke without fire.

Can we then make a list of stars of the 1980s and 1990s era and also from later stages - who could have achieved much more given their talent and versatility, but who all fell prey to a dirty word called ‘politics’?

Manoj Bajpai was one whose role as ‘Bhikhu Matre’ in ‘Satya’ was near path breaking. A number of other stars also came up and could not carry on for long. Next in mind comes Jugal Hansraj. He put on a sensational performance in 'Papa Kaheten haen' and the song 'Ghar se nikalte hi'. As a child artist he showed his potential in 'Masoom' directed by Shekhar Kapur, who incidentally hit headlines after Sushant Singh Rajput's tragic end too.

Jugal's career was also short-lived. Starring opposite Monisha Koirala, Vivek Mushran in ‘Saudagar’ also had looked very promising, but he too could not continue for long.

So much has been the manipulation of spin-masters that in 2000 and at later stages, we had television channels also focusing day in and day out only on one variety of film stars, their songs and their films. The obvious influence of the nepotism culture could not be simply ignored!

At a filmi function in Mumbai, Ashutosh Rana, who played the role of Shabnam Mausi in the film based on a transgender social worker had raised the bogey of talent and dynastic nepotism in Bollywood. Rana showed his potentials in several films but probably he too faced discrimination!


On the other hand, look at the glorification of a star called Sanjay Dutt and how everyone under the sun seemed to have forgotten the charges he faced. The Samajwadi Party of Mulayam Singh Yadav – largely at the influence of Amar Singh – in 2008 also made a political joke of the decade when Dutt was made the party general secretary ! What did a party claiming to uphold values of socialism and political principles of Ram Manohar Lohia and Jayaprakash Narayan achieved in the process remains a mystery.



Sunday, August 2, 2020

Some less known and not known stories of AYODHYA protagonists


** In his book, 'The Babri Masjid Ram Mandir Dilemma: An Acid Test for India's Constitution', Madhav Godbole had said:  

"Rajiv Gandhi remained focused on pleasing the fundamentalists among the Muslims and the Hindus; the Muslims by getting the Muslim Women's Divorce Act enacted, and later, the Hindus, by getting the locks of the 'temple in the mosque' in Ayodhya opened, permitting shilanyas (foundation stone-laying) of the new temple, and even starting the Congress party's Lok Sabha election campaign from Ayodhya to usher in Ram Rajya,"


Godbole, who quit as Union home secretary after the demolition of the 16th century disputed structure, called Rajiv Gandhi the "second most prominent kar sevak" 


## Lalu Prasad as Bihar CM in 1990 had reportedly observed a 12-hour fast on October 23, - 1990 -- the day L K Advani was  arrested.

*** Lalu later claimed Samastipur - where Advani was arrested in Oct 23, 1990- “the home district" of his political mentor the late Karpoori Thakur, and thus he found it duty-bound to halt the Rath Yatra. The episode had made him a formidable 'secular' leader and MY (Muslim-Yadav) card meant electoral success.



**** Raj Kumar (RK) Singh, who had arrested Advani in Samastipur, is now Union Power Minister under PM Narendra Modi. Before joining the IAS, he served for a year as the Indian Police Service official.
Singh studied English literature at St. Stephens College, Delhi, and got a degree in law also. He also studied at the RVB Delft University in the Netherlands. 


## In 2003 ASI begins a court-ordered survey to find out if a Ram temple existed. The survey revealed 'evidence' of a temple but Muslims contested the finding.

1949 --- Ram idol 'appears' inside the mosque. Muslims file suit. Hindus file counter-suit, leading the government to declare the site "disputed" and lock its gate.

In 1989, the Rajiv Gandhi government played up Shilanyas politics to appease to Hindus.
     ---- Post-Shilanyas, Congress leaders were keen to garner Hindu votes, 
  Rajiv Gandhi even kick-started his party’s election campaign from Ayodhya-Faizabad on November 3, 1989. The location was selected at the last moment.


Later Congress admitted that permitting the Shilanyas was a mistake !!




On Oct 30, 1990 ---- There was violence in Ayodhya. First two people identified at the 'top' of the Babri Masjid on Dec 6, 1992 were two Kothari brothers from Kolkata - Ram and Sharad.
They were allegedly killed by police at the order of the then UP CM Mulayam Singh Yadav. Their bodies were found on November 1, 1990 near the Hanuman Garhi temple, which is in the vicinity of the Ram Janmabhoomi temple site.


##

Muslim version: Worshipping of Lord Ram at Ram Chabutara (square platform), according to Muslims, had begun during the time of Akbar.


At a Meet-the-Press programme at Mumbai Press Club in 2002, former Prime Minister V P Singh had said: "I told P V Narasimha Rao, don't trust the Sadhus. They will do just the opposite of what they are saying. Afterall, these Sadhus are wayward sons. As children, they did not listen to their fathers. 

"Yeh log apne Baap ke nahi suney, tabhi toh Sadhu baney"

(By then VP Singh used to frequently visit Mumbai for his cancer treatment and dialysis) 

## Two slogans became very popular during the peak of Ram Temple movement --- one - 
RAM MANDIR BANANA HAE and the other
--- 
Ab ki baari ATAL BIHARI

IT WAS ALSO REPORTED that 

VAJPAYEE once told ADVANI..prior to Dec 6, 1992

"Advaniji aap Ayodhya ja rahen haen; Lanka nahi (Mr Advani do not forget you are going to Ayodhya and not Lanka)" -- suggesting that the Kar Sewaks need to be kept under control.



Saturday, August 1, 2020

My story: Niharbabu’s Last Rites: (Volume - Heart Alone --- Whispers in Relations/Amazon ebook)


Happy reading 

Nihar Chakravarty had woken up slightly depressed. The pain on the chest was punching him. So much to do, so much to tell the children, their spouses – his two son(s)-in-law but he knew he had very little time. So little motivation left. Yes, that was the most depressing part. 


The pain was getting unbearable. The visit to the doctor in the far off nursing home in the district town has not helped much. Unnecessarily, we had to cough up so much money. His eldest son was predictably disturbed. The pain would be killing and at last, Niharbabu passed on to comma. But that was it….. The journey from comma to full stop came sooner than his ‘urgent’ auto drive in the three-wheeler to the local hospital. Niharbabu had collapsed. 

The news spread like wildfire in the tiny township which even 15 years back would have easily fitted as a village. His friends, relatives and acquaintances and colleagues – in the school and the town committee – came pouring in the hospital. Someone was almost dragging Niharbabu’s elder brother to the hospital. 

‘Borda’ as Niharbabu used to address him sat on the steps of the hospital holding his chin on the right palm; wondering about what has happened so suddenly and quickly. “Oh my God, now I have to live with the tragedy of losing a younger brother”, wondered Borda (the eldest brother as the nomenclature suggested). His eyes had gone moist.

Everybody stood in pensive mood. This was what the environment around the hospital that evening conditioned them to think. 

“He was hardly 65”, someone said. 
“He would have been 66 this August,” remarked Niharbabu’s longtime associate Subir Das. A frail looking Das looked more sickly than the deceased Niharbabu lying now wrapped in a white cloth inside the ward. 
There was some whispering around ….. “Niharbabu had neglected his health”. “He had an attack about 2 years back”.

“I have heard his second son had an affair…. There was lot of tension in the house”, went another.

“Is it so? I know his second son… so docile looking! His father was fond of him. Truth is often stranger”, remarked Shajal Kanungo, a gossip monger and a distant relative of Niharbabu.

$

The body was put on flame. Normal rites done ……. Slowly came the D-Day, the day of last rites. It poured incessantly the previous night. There was strong breeze blowing. 


The trees were making all sorts of noise. The wind swept howling around and gave the trees and towering bamboo plants adjoining the pond no peace. A soothsayer told his aging wife, “my grandfather used to fear these kinds of winds on the eve of Sraddha (Last rites)…. The dead soul comes back around in the village and hides in the bush”.


The next morning: the most unpredictable thing occurred. 

My soul could visit my town, my home!




$
I went around the arrangement. My children and wife seemed to have worked hard to organize my ‘last journey’ to eternity smoothly. There was a huge pandal for the guests to be served with lunch. There were two smaller pandals – one for doing the last rites and the other probably to feed the Brahmins – the greedy lot!.

Why my sons have to do this? I never believed in all these. I was an agnostic kind of person….. but look at these shows. All my children knew my dislike for all these. Oh, their mother must have insisted on this. After all, she was my ‘life partner’ for about 30 years. 
 
Sitting in a corner, I could get a glance of her. Predictably, she was weeping. Everyone around was trying to comfort her. My children, their spouses, my colleagues and what’s this – even my school headmaster and boss of many years, Shaibal Sen.


Shaibal Sen rubbing his hand gently over my wife’s head and slowly…. the gutsy shoulder. This crook was always eyeing Banalata. I distinctly remember, once he had said, “your wife’s name Banalata itself is like a current volt….. some poetry in it…. You know what does it mean?”


As he was my boss, I tried to be gentleman…. Or else I would have shown that son of a dog, what’s real ‘bhadrata’ (courtesy) is. I had simply gazed; then to top it all, Shaibal Sen had asked, “did you like her name or features more”.


The word or name Banalata, as I understand stood for ‘jungle tweeds’ but over the time the name has become a symbol of feminine mystery, beauty and love. Thanks essentially to Bengali poet, Jibanananda Das’s celebrated title work: ‘Banalata Sen’. 


Now, I knew, sleazy Shaibal Sen was making opportune use of the moment. I wish Shaibal Sen’s dominating wife walks in just now. The fellow would get a public thrashing!



Then, I saw my two sons walking in towards the pandal designated for performing the last rites. My poor two souls….. How much they would miss me. My exit was sudden.
It was like the sudden shut down of a computer or rather the laptops, both my sons use. The virus had penetrated and shut down the system without notice. The anti-virus was not updated, I suppose.

But in human stories; no amount of updating helps. It is what I call, humanity’s biggest mystery is -- ….. Flirting with Failure. 

Human lives have been going through all these generations after generations and even civilizations after civilizations. 
I saw in the corner where my wife was seating; two of my daughters trying to console their mother now. Both are married. Their husbands stood dutifully at a safe distance. The eldest son-in-law much closer to his wife … may be ever ready to take her orders. We all liked him most. My wife Banalata often said, “our son-in-law, the eldest Jamai, Bikram is better than many sons”.

Hiding behind the make-shift bamboo pole, I try to gaze in on his face. It looked sombre. After all, he 
has lost his father-in-law. Affectionately, he called me ‘Babu’. 


But the more notorious was my second son-in-law. He never called me ‘Babu or Baba’.

This egoistic male chauvinist, I have often overheard him telling: “chhele-der ektai baap hoi … (Sons have only one father)”. 

He always thought big of himself, his profession, his family and worse his father, a retired army official…. Colonel or something.

I wonder, how could, my younger daughter fall in love with this silly character. 

I always thought, he was good for nothing. I remember even telling angrily once to my second daughter, “Bubu, your husband is only good in arguing. His illness is his ego. Tell him, he should never come even for my last rites”.

But the fellow has come and was seemingly running here and there helping out to organize my last journey. To me, he pretended to be a specialist in every branch. Would lecture people on all issues and more than lecturing, he would find fault with. His razor sharp tongue!


I was not quite sure, whether my poor Bubu was happy with this man, son of the Colonel. However, I have overheard them - as husband and wife normally talking of romance or holidaying in Nepal or Goa. But that son of colonel instead once took my daughter to Gaya, where people normally visit to conduct only last rites.

A freelance writer, he would describe himself. My second son-in-law did talk on domestic issues. But the conversation would often go around, my failure to inculcate certain values in my Bubu.


“As a wife, she does not know how to respect her husband and his feelings,” he would often scream. I never approved of his statement. But occasionally the conversation sailed off to the shores of literature and politics as well. 

Here too, he would mock at me: “the Left has been shown the door in Europe…. Now it is the turn of Bengal”.

The politics of Bengal enthralled him post-2007 and he always rejoiced at the Buddhadeb regime’s failure to industrialize either Nandigram or Singur.

Standing under the roof of the verandah and staring at my last rites, probably he is still thinking about my Leftist ideologies and how highly I adored them. But I am sure; he would not understand anything of these.

Suddenly, my concentration on that 'good for nothing' son-in-law was disturbed by the surr surr sound of the bamboo broom, then splashing of water with the green pipe, I had bought for Rs 60 just the other day. All these made an unpleasant medley. I was wondering, while this green water pipe has remained as inherent part of the family, as its owner I have been pushed out to the periphery. The ceremony would push me out further.


Slowly, I would lose my importance and then even vanish from their memory. 

I thought of running away from the spot into the jungle and bushes. Why that windy breeze and severe rainfall brought me down to my courtyard. I was happy away.

Just then the Purohit sat on his chair and directed my two sons to perform the rituals. There were some Mantras uttered….. 
“…Asmat Pita …..Teelodakam ..GangaJalam Vaa 
Tasmey Swadha Namah, Tasmey Swadha Namah, Tasmey Swadha Namah.”

I knew the entire purpose was to chase me away. Suddenly, I remembered a quote often told by my grandmother during my heydays and perhaps also hers: “Between a wolf and a hunter, it’s not the wolf who chose the hunting ground…. It’s the hunter”.
So the priest was trying to be a hunter. 


I stared at my two sons. Loving boys. The inheritors of my and my family legacy. 

They were religiously performing the rituals. The eldest one was doing the major work as he had the special privilege.

He was born on a rainy morning in the last week of December. Banalata had never forgiven me for the ill timing. Well, that was my first shot at fatherhood. How would I know, something I dole out in April-May would herald so much trouble time for her in December. 


Subsequently, in all three occasions, she was always cautious “nothing doing in April-May moshai… No amount of air conditioner would convince me”.

Banalata was methodical about many things in life. 
Like others, she too was a nagging wife. She would be a critic both of my habits and my inability to comprehend many things about the children and their ‘generation next’ approach. On my part, I would dismiss her criticism, but unwittingly I did value them but yet again they were hardly followed by corrective steps.


As a humble school master and not well paid situation like mine, I ought to be grateful to Banalata for coping with me all these years. Nearly 30.
Despite my oft-repeated screaming at her and disallowing her to visit her parental home when she was younger and her parents were alive, Banalata did help me through the trying time. I never found her a passive partner. She often created an easy going atmosphere at home. She ensured her cooking was always good so that her children and their father did not complain about that. Making some extra money by giving tuitions or working for the town committee during extra hours often demanded that I am left to myself. 

Banalata would slog uncomplaining, pick up vegetables from Monday Haat, call the plumber or fetch the atta packet herself. 
All these thoughts again dragged me towards my wife. Now she was bowing folded hands before my photo placed on that tiny tool, she would often squat underneath sun during winter days. Probably, I could feel her touch. Good old touch. Something quite familiar. Shamefully, I tried to take a closer look at her back. The two buttocks still looked tight. And why not? She was hardly 52. About 12-13 years younger to me.


My sons were following the instructions of the priest. The fat Mukherjee Purohit must be eyeing at things those lay around my framed photograph. Bags full of rice, five large baskets of vegetables, towels, dhotis, mustard oil and also Cholesterol free refined oil of a big brand. Cot, bedding and even sandals. All were being offered to this greedy fellow in my name!

“Samay toh thakbe na go ma, kebal mo go katha robey…..” (Time would not wait for anyone….. only thing that remains what we speak and tell of each other)… the popular Shyama Sangeet song in reverence to Goddess Kali by Pannalal Bhattacharya was being played in the neighbourhood. I could not question the timing.



These thoughts were bound to be first person and melancholic at least for me. My thoughts then sprang quickly towards my second son, Prabir.

Why this docile and introvert kid of mine had to fall in love with a Christian girl? So what, I was a Leftist in thinking? I too had to face the society.


How could I face a question: ‘Mastermoshai, Ki Holo (What happened sir, we just came to know about your second son’s marriage)?

So without my knowing; I had also opposed his marriage to that girl. Prabir had argued violently. As he was youngest, he was the pampered among the lot both by me and Banalata. We never expected this from him.
A progressive boy he is, Prabir tried to argue. Banalata silenced him.
I tried to reason. 

“Karl Marx and others never faced the kind of problem, we Hindus faced in this country. From nowhere Christians came and started converting us. Christianity to me is something western, more of a political tool to suit the colonizers and not the religion as ethically propounded by Christ. Christianity is alien to our culture. Christianity teaches about giving away one coat, if you have two….. But is that happening? 

Which Indian Christian has followed that teaching? They even claim reservation as Dalit Christians?”


The pain in the chest was palpable. I knew, something was going wrong. Probably, Prabir too understood and he took me to the city nursing home. His elder brother came in later. My elder son has been a pragmatic marketing executive. He knew the futility of spending money after me. Thoughts of gain, profit margin, cost cutting subordinated everything in his life.


These left me scared. Now, that I am gone and Prabir would walk away with the Christian girl what would happen to Banalata. For the first time since my re-visit to the house as a ‘soul’ I started regretting. I was worried about Banalata.



Suddenly, I was cursing myself. What did I do? I had always told Banalata that she should go away before me. “The kind of half-brain you have, I pray you should die before me. All alone without me, you will be left nowhere. Your children cannot cope with your foolishness”, I had told her many times in these last three decades.

But what have I done? 

What did I do in this life? What did I do in death? Left Banalata deserted. 

Somewhere I used to hear: political class cursing my Leftists brethren. – Left has left us in the lurch. I too had left Banalata in the lurch.


Was I a good husband? My children, I knew, could not think of their mother as anything more than someone who cooked and ran the kitchen administration. The Mantras were still on. Hawan Kund was burning. My time has not yet come for salvation! 


I look for cover in the bushes behind the kitchen….. may be I will be hiding there permanently and keep an eye on my Banalata, who is bound to fend for herself all alone in that spacious kitchen feeding the armies of our children and their families. 


(ends) 

Abu Dhabi talks ::: Russia wants a peace that converts aggression into a wider strategic victory ::::: Ukraine needs a peace that preserves its ability to survive

Even as modest progress was made in Abu Dhabi talks between Russia and Ukraine, it is too early say that the negotiations were moving toward...